Cunningham Owens David, Johnstone Eve C
Division of Psychiatry, College of Medicine & Veterinary Medicine, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Brain Neurosci Adv. 2018 Dec 5;2:2398212818817498. doi: 10.1177/2398212818817498. eCollection 2018 Jan-Dec.
Antipsychotic drugs revolutionised psychiatric practice and provided a range of tools for exploring brain function in health and disease. Their development and introduction were largely empirical but based on long and honourable scientific credentials and remarkable powers of clinical observation. The class shares a common core action of attenuating central dopamine transmission, which underlies the major limitation to their use - high liability to disrupt extrapyramidal function - and also the most durable hypothesis of the basis of psychotic disorders, especially schizophrenia. However, the Dopamine Hypothesis, which has driven drug development for almost half a century, has become a straight-jacket, stifling innovation, resulting in a class of compounds that are largely derivative. Recent efforts only cemented this tendency as no clinical evidence supports the notion that newer compounds, modelled on clozapine, share that drug's unique neurological tolerability and can be considered 'atypical'. Patients and doctors alike must await a more profound understanding of central dopamine homeostasis and novel methods of maintaining it before they can again experience the intoxicating promise antipsychotics once held.
抗精神病药物彻底改变了精神病学实践,并为探索健康和疾病状态下的脑功能提供了一系列工具。它们的研发和应用在很大程度上是经验性的,但基于悠久而令人尊敬的科学背景以及卓越的临床观察能力。这类药物具有减弱中枢多巴胺传递的共同核心作用,这既是其使用的主要限制——极易破坏锥体外系功能——的基础,也是关于精神障碍尤其是精神分裂症病因的最持久假说的基础。然而,推动了近半个世纪药物研发的多巴胺假说,已成为一种束缚,抑制了创新,导致一类化合物大多是衍生物。最近的努力只是强化了这种趋势,因为没有临床证据支持这样的观点,即以氯氮平为模型的新型化合物具有该药物独特的神经耐受性,可被视为“非典型”药物。患者和医生都必须等待对中枢多巴胺稳态有更深刻的理解以及维持它的新方法出现,之后才能再次体验抗精神病药物曾经拥有的令人陶醉的前景。