Suppr超能文献

贝伐珠单抗联合或不联合伏立诺他治疗复发性胶质母细胞瘤的贝叶斯自适应随机二期多中心试验。

A Bayesian adaptive randomized phase II multicenter trial of bevacizumab with or without vorinostat in adults with recurrent glioblastoma.

机构信息

Division of Neuro-Oncoology, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, Ohio.

Neuro-Oncology Branch, National Institute of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.

出版信息

Neuro Oncol. 2020 Oct 14;22(10):1505-1515. doi: 10.1093/neuonc/noaa062.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Bevacizumab has promising activity against recurrent glioblastoma (GBM). However, acquired resistance to this agent results in tumor recurrence. We hypothesized that vorinostat, a histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitor with anti-angiogenic effects, would prevent acquired resistance to bevacizumab.

METHODS

This multicenter phase II trial used a Bayesian adaptive design to randomize patients with recurrent GBM to bevacizumab alone or bevacizumab plus vorinostat with the primary endpoint of progression-free survival (PFS) and secondary endpoints of overall survival (OS) and clinical outcomes assessment (MD Anderson Symptom Inventory Brain Tumor module [MDASI-BT]). Eligible patients were adults (≥18 y) with histologically confirmed GBM recurrent after prior radiation therapy, with adequate organ function, KPS ≥60, and no prior bevacizumab or HDAC inhibitors.

RESULTS

Ninety patients (bevacizumab + vorinostat: 49, bevacizumab: 41) were enrolled, of whom 74 were evaluable for PFS (bevacizumab + vorinostat: 44, bevacizumab: 30). Median PFS (3.7 vs 3.9 mo, P = 0.94, hazard ratio [HR] 0.63 [95% CI: 0.38, 1.06, P = 0.08]), median OS (7.8 vs 9.3 mo, P = 0.64, HR 0.93 [95% CI: 0.5, 1.6, P = 0.79]) and clinical benefit were similar between the 2 arms. Toxicity (grade ≥3) in 85 evaluable patients included hypertension (n = 37), neurological changes (n = 2), anorexia (n = 2), infections (n = 9), wound dehiscence (n = 2), deep vein thrombosis/pulmonary embolism (n = 2), and colonic perforation (n = 1).

CONCLUSIONS

Bevacizumab combined with vorinostat did not yield improvement in PFS or OS or clinical benefit compared with bevacizumab alone or a clinical benefit in adults with recurrent GBM. This trial is the first to test a Bayesian adaptive design with adaptive randomization and Bayesian continuous monitoring in patients with primary brain tumor and demonstrates the feasibility of using complex Bayesian adaptive design in a multicenter setting.

摘要

背景

贝伐单抗对复发性胶质母细胞瘤(GBM)具有良好的活性。然而,该药物的获得性耐药会导致肿瘤复发。我们假设组蛋白去乙酰化酶(HDAC)抑制剂伏立诺他具有抗血管生成作用,可预防贝伐单抗的获得性耐药。

方法

这项多中心 II 期试验采用贝叶斯自适应设计,将复发性 GBM 患者随机分为贝伐单抗单药组或贝伐单抗联合伏立诺他组,主要终点为无进展生存期(PFS),次要终点为总生存期(OS)和临床疗效评估(MD 安德森症状量表脑肿瘤模块[MDASI-BT])。纳入标准为:年龄≥18 岁,经放疗后复发的组织学证实的 GBM,器官功能良好,KPS≥60,且无贝伐单抗或 HDAC 抑制剂治疗史。

结果

共纳入 90 例患者(贝伐单抗联合伏立诺他组 49 例,贝伐单抗组 41 例),其中 74 例患者可评估 PFS(贝伐单抗联合伏立诺他组 44 例,贝伐单抗组 30 例)。PFS(3.7 个月 vs 3.9 个月,P=0.94,HR 0.63[95%CI:0.38,1.06,P=0.08])、OS(7.8 个月 vs 9.3 个月,P=0.64,HR 0.93[95%CI:0.5,1.6,P=0.79])和临床获益在两组间无显著差异。85 例可评估毒性(≥3 级)的患者中,发生高血压(n=37)、神经功能改变(n=2)、厌食(n=2)、感染(n=9)、伤口裂开(n=2)、深静脉血栓/肺栓塞(n=2)和结肠穿孔(n=1)。

结论

与贝伐单抗单药治疗相比,贝伐单抗联合伏立诺他并未改善复发性 GBM 患者的 PFS、OS 或临床获益,也未能在成人复发性 GBM 患者中体现出临床获益。该试验首次采用贝叶斯自适应设计,对原发性脑肿瘤患者进行适应性随机分组和贝叶斯连续监测,证明了在多中心环境中使用复杂贝叶斯自适应设计的可行性。

相似文献

4
Anti-angiogenic therapy for high-grade glioma.高级别胶质瘤的抗血管生成治疗。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Nov 22;11(11):CD008218. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008218.pub4.
5
Antiangiogenic therapy for high-grade glioma.高级别胶质瘤的抗血管生成治疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Sep 22(9):CD008218. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008218.pub3.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

5
Adaptive Global Innovative Learning Environment for Glioblastoma: GBM AGILE.胶质母细胞瘤的适应性全球创新学习环境:GBM AGILE。
Clin Cancer Res. 2018 Feb 15;24(4):737-743. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-17-0764. Epub 2017 Aug 16.
7
New Directions in Anti-Angiogenic Therapy for Glioblastoma.胶质母细胞瘤抗血管生成治疗的新方向
Neurotherapeutics. 2017 Apr;14(2):321-332. doi: 10.1007/s13311-016-0510-y.
8
Commentary on Hey and Kimmelman.对海伊和金梅尔曼的评论。
Clin Trials. 2015 Apr;12(2):107-9. doi: 10.1177/1740774515569011. Epub 2015 Feb 3.
9
Commentary on Hey and Kimmelman.关于海伊和金梅尔曼的评论
Clin Trials. 2015 Apr;12(2):110-2. doi: 10.1177/1740774514568875. Epub 2015 Feb 3.
10
Commentary on Hey and Kimmelman.对海伊和金梅尔曼的评论。
Clin Trials. 2015 Apr;12(2):113-5. doi: 10.1177/1740774514568874. Epub 2015 Feb 3.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验