Hinson Whitney D, Rogovskyy Artem S, Lawhon Sara D, Thieman Mankin Kelley M
Department of Small Animal Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Texas A&M College of Veterinary Medicine, College Station, Texas.
Department of Veterinary Pathobiology, College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Texas A&M College of Veterinary Medicine, College Station, Texas.
Vet Surg. 2020 Jul;49(5):989-996. doi: 10.1111/vsu.13410. Epub 2020 Mar 12.
To determine the ability of cell salvage washing and leukoreduction filtration to remove bacterial contamination from canine whole blood.
Ex vivo nested cohort study.
Commercially purchased fresh canine whole blood (n = 33 units).
Commercially obtained canine whole blood was inoculated with known concentrations of one of three species of bacteria, Escherichia coli (ATCC 25922), Staphylococcus pseudintermedius (quality control strain; Texas A&M University), or Pseudomonas aeruginosa (ATCC 27853). Negative controls were inoculated with sterile saline. The inoculated blood was processed through a cell salvage system and filtered through a series of two leukocyte reduction filters. Samples were aseptically collected at five points during processing (inoculum, prewash, postwash, post-first filtration, and post-second filtration) for bacterial enumeration.
Bacterial concentrations were reduced by 85.2%, 91.5%, and 93.9% for E coli, S pseudintermedius, and P aeruginosa, respectively, after washing (P < .0001), and bacterial concentrations were reduced by 99.9%, 100%, and 100%, respectively, after the first filtration (P < .0001). After the second filtration, none of the three species of bacteria could be isolated (100% reduction). No bacterial growth was obtained from negative controls throughout the study. The type of bacteria (P = .29) did not allow prediction of bacterial reduction.
Cell salvage washing combined with leukoreduction filtration eliminated bacterial contamination of whole dog blood (P < .0001).
Cell salvage washing and leukoreduction filtration could be applied to intraoperative autotransfusion in clinical animals, especially those treated for trauma or hemorrhage with concurrent bacterial contamination.
确定细胞回收洗涤和白细胞滤除对去除犬全血中细菌污染的能力。
体外嵌套队列研究。
商业购买的新鲜犬全血(n = 33单位)。
将商业获得的犬全血接种已知浓度的三种细菌之一,即大肠杆菌(ATCC 25922)、中间型葡萄球菌(质控菌株;德克萨斯农工大学)或铜绿假单胞菌(ATCC 27853)。阴性对照接种无菌盐水。接种后的血液通过细胞回收系统处理,并通过一系列两个白细胞滤除过滤器过滤。在处理过程中的五个时间点(接种物、洗涤前、洗涤后、第一次过滤后和第二次过滤后)无菌采集样本进行细菌计数。
洗涤后,大肠杆菌、中间型葡萄球菌和铜绿假单胞菌的细菌浓度分别降低了85.2%、91.5%和93.9%(P <.0001),第一次过滤后细菌浓度分别降低了99.9%、100%和100%(P <.0001)。第二次过滤后,三种细菌均未分离到(降低100%)。在整个研究过程中,阴性对照均未获得细菌生长。细菌种类(P =.29)无法预测细菌减少情况。
细胞回收洗涤联合白细胞滤除消除了犬全血的细菌污染(P <.0001)。
细胞回收洗涤和白细胞滤除可应用于临床动物的术中自体输血,尤其是那些因创伤或出血并伴有细菌污染而接受治疗的动物。