• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

T1b 期肿瘤行开放与腹腔镜肾部分切除术的肿瘤学及功能结局:单中心分析。

Oncological and functional outcomes of open versus laparoscopic partial nephrectomy in T1b tumors: A single-center analysis.

机构信息

Department of Urology, University of Health Sciences, Dişkapi Yildirim Beyazit Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.

出版信息

Int Braz J Urol. 2020 May-Jun;46(3):341-350. doi: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2018.0865.

DOI:10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2018.0865
PMID:32167695
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7088474/
Abstract

PURPOSE

This study aims to evaluate the oncological and functional results of open partial nephrectomy (OPN) and laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN) at the T1b clinical stage, which constitutes 25% of renal cell carcinomas (RCC) at diagnosis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The characteristics of 63 patients with stage T1b solitary tumor who underwent OPN (41) or LPN (22) were compared. The survival analysis was performed using the Kaplan-Meier method. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were performed to determine the factors affecting disease-free survival. Potential predictive factors, which might affect the postoperative glomerular filtration rate (GFR), were evaluated using multivariate linear regression analysis.

RESULTS

No differences were observed between OPN and LPN groups regarding patient and tumor characteristics. Although the warm ischemia time, intraoperative estimated blood loss, and operation duration were higher in the LPN group, no differences were noted between the two techniques regarding complication rates (p<0.001, p=0.023, p≤0.001, and p=0.190, respectively). The median hospitalization time was shorter in the LPN group than that in the OPN group (4 and 5 days, respectively), with less severe complications. No intergroup differences were observed regarding cancer-specific survival (CSS), disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS). The evaluation of the factors affecting DFS showed that age was an effective parameter (RR = 1.112, 95% CI: 1.010-8.254), but the surgical technique was not.

CONCLUSION

No differences were observed between OPN and LPN techniques between oncological and functional outcomes in patients with clinical stage T1b RCC.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估 T1b 期局限性肾细胞癌(RCC)占诊断时 RCC 25%的开放式部分肾切除术(OPN)和腹腔镜部分肾切除术(LPN)的肿瘤学和功能结果。

材料和方法

比较了 63 例 T1b 期孤立肿瘤患者接受 OPN(41 例)或 LPN(22 例)的特征。采用 Kaplan-Meier 方法进行生存分析。采用单因素和多因素 Cox 回归分析确定影响无病生存率的因素。采用多元线性回归分析评估可能影响术后肾小球滤过率(GFR)的潜在预测因素。

结果

OPN 和 LPN 组在患者和肿瘤特征方面无差异。虽然 LPN 组的热缺血时间、术中估计失血量和手术时间较高,但两种技术的并发症发生率无差异(p<0.001、p=0.023、p≤0.001 和 p=0.190)。LPN 组的中位住院时间短于 OPN 组(分别为 4 天和 5 天),且并发症较轻。两组之间在癌症特异性生存率(CSS)、无病生存率(DFS)和总生存率(OS)方面无差异。DFS 影响因素的评估显示,年龄是一个有效的参数(RR=1.112,95%CI:1.010-8.254),但手术技术不是。

结论

在 T1b 期 RCC 患者中,OPN 和 LPN 技术在肿瘤学和功能结果方面无差异。

相似文献

1
Oncological and functional outcomes of open versus laparoscopic partial nephrectomy in T1b tumors: A single-center analysis.T1b 期肿瘤行开放与腹腔镜肾部分切除术的肿瘤学及功能结局:单中心分析。
Int Braz J Urol. 2020 May-Jun;46(3):341-350. doi: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2018.0865.
2
Comparison of survival and renal function between partial and radical laparoscopic nephrectomy for T1b renal cell carcinoma.部分腹腔镜与根治性腹腔镜肾切除术治疗 T1b 期肾癌的生存及肾功能比较。
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2020 Jan;146(1):261-272. doi: 10.1007/s00432-019-03058-z. Epub 2019 Nov 1.
3
Laparoscopic and open partial nephrectomy: a matched-pair comparison of 200 patients.腹腔镜与开放性部分肾切除术:200例配对患者的比较
Eur Urol. 2009 May;55(5):1171-8. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2009.01.042. Epub 2009 Feb 20.
4
Laparoscopic vs open partial nephrectomy for T1 renal tumours: evaluation of long-term oncological and functional outcomes in 340 patients.腹腔镜与开放肾部分切除术治疗 T1 期肾肿瘤:340 例患者长期肿瘤学和功能结局评估。
BJU Int. 2013 Feb;111(2):281-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11280.x. Epub 2012 Jun 6.
5
Comparison of Partial and Radical Laparascopic Nephrectomy: Long-Term Outcomes for Clinical T1b Renal Cell Carcinoma.腹腔镜部分肾切除术与根治性肾切除术的比较:临床T1b期肾细胞癌的长期预后
Urol J. 2018 Mar 18;15(2):16-20. doi: 10.22037/uj.v0i0.3913.
6
Partial Nephrectomy in Clinical T1b Renal Tumors: Multicenter Comparative Study of Open, Laparoscopic and Robot-assisted Approach (the RECORd Project).临床T1b期肾肿瘤的部分肾切除术:开放、腹腔镜及机器人辅助手术入路的多中心比较研究(RECORd项目)
Urology. 2016 Mar;89:45-51. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2015.08.049. Epub 2015 Dec 29.
7
Robot-assisted versus laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for anatomically complex T1b renal tumors with a RENAL nephrometry score ≥7: A propensity score-based analysis.机器人辅助与腹腔镜部分肾切除术治疗 RENAL 肾肿瘤评分≥7 的解剖复杂 T1b 肾肿瘤:基于倾向评分的分析。
Cancer Med. 2020 Jan;9(2):586-594. doi: 10.1002/cam4.2749. Epub 2019 Dec 2.
8
Laparoscopic radical nephrectomy vs laparoscopic or open partial nephrectomy for T1 renal cell carcinoma: comparison of complication rates in elderly patients during the initial phase of adoption.腹腔镜根治性肾切除术与腹腔镜或开放性部分肾切除术治疗 T1 期肾细胞癌:在采用初期老年患者并发症发生率的比较。
Urology. 2014 Jun;83(6):1285-91. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2014.01.050.
9
Functional and oncological outcomes of open, laparoscopic and robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: a multicentre comparative matched-pair analyses with a median of 5 years' follow-up.开放、腹腔镜和机器人辅助部分肾切除术的功能和肿瘤学结果:一项多中心配对比较分析,中位随访时间为 5 年。
BJU Int. 2018 Oct;122(4):618-626. doi: 10.1111/bju.14250. Epub 2018 May 24.
10
Treatment outcomes of partial nephrectomy for T1b tumours.T1b 期肿瘤行部分肾切除术的治疗效果。
Curr Opin Urol. 2013 Sep;23(5):403-10. doi: 10.1097/MOU.0b013e328363a5c0.

引用本文的文献

1
Patients with high nuclear grade pT1-ccRCC are more suitable for radical nephrectomy than partial nephrectomy: a multicenter retrospective study using propensity score.高核分级 pT1-ccRCC 患者更适合行根治性肾切除术而非部分肾切除术:基于倾向评分的多中心回顾性研究。
World J Surg Oncol. 2024 Jan 23;22(1):24. doi: 10.1186/s12957-024-03302-y.
2
A novel nomogram can predict pathological T3a upstaged from clinical T1a in localized renal cell carcinoma.一种新的列线图可以预测局限性肾细胞癌中从临床 T1a 升级为病理 T3a 的情况。
Int Braz J Urol. 2022 Sep-Oct;48(5):784-794. doi: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2021.0859.
3
Comparison of Perioperative Outcomes Between Laparoscopic and Open Partial Nephrectomy for Different Complexity Renal Cell Carcinoma Based on the R.E.N.A.L. Nephrometry Score.

本文引用的文献

1
Surgical Approach Does Not Impact Margin Status After Partial Nephrectomy for Large Renal Masses.手术入路对大体积肾肿瘤行部分肾切除术的切缘状态无影响。
J Endourol. 2019 Jan;33(1):50-60. doi: 10.1089/end.2018.0144.
2
Renal Mass and Localized Renal Cancer: AUA Guideline.肾脏肿块和局限性肾细胞癌:AUA 指南。
J Urol. 2017 Sep;198(3):520-529. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2017.04.100. Epub 2017 May 4.
3
Laparoscopic Versus Open Partial Nephrectomy for Stage T1a of Renal Tumors.腹腔镜与开放手术治疗T1a期肾肿瘤的部分肾切除术对比
基于R.E.N.A.L.肾计量评分的不同复杂性肾细胞癌腹腔镜与开放性部分肾切除术围手术期结果比较
Cancer Manag Res. 2021 Sep 28;13:7455-7461. doi: 10.2147/CMAR.S324457. eCollection 2021.
4
Trifecta achievement in patients undergoing partial nephrectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of predictive factors.接受部分肾切除术患者的三连胜成就:预测因素的系统评价和荟萃分析
Int Braz J Urol. 2022 Jul-Aug;48(4):625-636. doi: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2021.0095.
5
Laparoscopic Versus Open Partial Nephrectomy: A Systemic Review and Meta-Analysis of Surgical, Oncological, and Functional Outcomes.腹腔镜与开放性部分肾切除术:手术、肿瘤学及功能结局的系统评价与荟萃分析
Front Oncol. 2020 Oct 29;10:583979. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2020.583979. eCollection 2020.
6
Editorial Comment: Oncological and functional outcomes of open versus laparoscopic partial nephrectomy in T1b tumors: A single-center analysis.编辑评论:T1b期肿瘤开放与腹腔镜下肾部分切除术的肿瘤学及功能学结果:单中心分析
Int Braz J Urol. 2020 May-Jun;46(3):351-352. doi: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2018.0865.1.
Urol J. 2016 Dec 8;13(6):2903-2907.
4
Partial Nephrectomy in Clinical T1b Renal Tumors: Multicenter Comparative Study of Open, Laparoscopic and Robot-assisted Approach (the RECORd Project).临床T1b期肾肿瘤的部分肾切除术:开放、腹腔镜及机器人辅助手术入路的多中心比较研究(RECORd项目)
Urology. 2016 Mar;89:45-51. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2015.08.049. Epub 2015 Dec 29.
5
Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy with Precise Segmental Renal Artery Clamping for Clinical T1b Tumors.腹腔镜下精准节段性肾动脉阻断术治疗临床T1b期肿瘤的部分肾切除术
J Endourol. 2015 Dec;29(12):1386-91. doi: 10.1089/end.2015.0359. Epub 2015 Aug 19.
6
EAU guidelines on renal cell carcinoma: 2014 update.EAU 指南:肾细胞癌. 2014 年更新版.
Eur Urol. 2015 May;67(5):913-24. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.01.005. Epub 2015 Jan 21.
7
Nephron-sparing techniques independently decrease the risk of cardiovascular events relative to radical nephrectomy in patients with a T1a-T1b renal mass and normal preoperative renal function.保肾技术独立于根治性肾切除术降低 T1a-T1b 期肾肿瘤和术前肾功能正常患者的心血管事件风险。
Eur Urol. 2015 Apr;67(4):683-9. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.09.027. Epub 2014 Oct 3.
8
Robotic partial nephrectomy for clinical stage T1b tumors: intermediate oncologic and functional outcomes.临床分期为T1b肿瘤的机器人辅助部分肾切除术:中期肿瘤学和功能结果
Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2015 Feb;13(1):94-9. doi: 10.1016/j.clgc.2014.07.011. Epub 2014 Aug 1.
9
Learning curves for robot-assisted and laparoscopic partial nephrectomy.机器人辅助与腹腔镜下肾部分切除术的学习曲线
J Endourol. 2015 Mar;29(3):297-303. doi: 10.1089/end.2014.0303. Epub 2014 Oct 21.
10
Laparoscopic versus open partial nephrectomy for clinical T1 renal masses: no impact of surgical approach on perioperative complications and long-term postoperative quality of life.临床T1期肾肿块的腹腔镜与开放性部分肾切除术:手术方式对围手术期并发症及术后长期生活质量无影响。
World J Urol. 2015 Mar;33(3):421-6. doi: 10.1007/s00345-014-1318-1. Epub 2014 May 31.