Suppr超能文献

高核分级 pT1-ccRCC 患者更适合行根治性肾切除术而非部分肾切除术:基于倾向评分的多中心回顾性研究。

Patients with high nuclear grade pT1-ccRCC are more suitable for radical nephrectomy than partial nephrectomy: a multicenter retrospective study using propensity score.

机构信息

Department of Urology, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, 410011, Hunan, China.

Xiangya School of Medicine, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China.

出版信息

World J Surg Oncol. 2024 Jan 23;22(1):24. doi: 10.1186/s12957-024-03302-y.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Partial nephrectomy (PN) is usually recommended for T1 stage clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) regardless of the nuclear grades. However, the question remains unresolved as to whether PN is non-inferior to RN in patients with T1-ccRCC at higher risk of recurrence. In fact, we found that patients with high nuclear grades treated with PN had poorer prognosis compared with those treated with radical nephrectomy (RN). Therefore, this study was designed to evaluate the associations of PN and RN in the four nuclear grade subsets with oncologic outcomes.

METHODS

A retrospective study was conducted in three Chinese urological centers that included 1,714 patients who underwent PN or RN for sporadic, unilateral, pT1, N0, and M0 ccRCC without positive surgical margins and neoadjuvant therapy between 2010 and 2019. Associations of nephrectomy type with local ipsilateral recurrence, distant metastases, and all-cause mortality (ACM) were evaluated using the Kaplan-Meier method and multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression models after overlap weighting (OW).

RESULTS

A total of 1675 patients entered the OW cohort. After OW, in comparison to PN, RN associated with a reduced risk of local ipsilateral recurrence in the G2 subset (HR = 0.148, 95% CI 0.046-0.474; p < 0.05), G3 subset (HR = 0.097, 95% CI 0.021-0.455; p < 0.05), and G4 subset (HR = 0.091, 95% CI 0.011-0.736; p < 0.05), and resulting in increased five-year local recurrence-free survival rates of 7.0%, 17.9%, and 36.2%, respectively. An association between RN and a reduced risk of distant metastases in the G4 subset (HR = 0.071, 95% CI 0.016-0.325; p < 0.05), with the five-year distant metastases-free survival rate increasing by 33.1% was also observed. No significant difference in ACM between PN and RN was identified.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings substantiate that opting for RN, as opposed to PN, is more advantageous for local recurrence-free survival and distant metastases-free survival in patients with high nuclear grade (especially G4) pT1-ccRCC. We recommend placing a heightened emphasis on enhancing preoperative nuclear grade assessment, as it can significantly influence the choice of surgical plan.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

This study was registered at Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ID: ChiCTR2200063333).

摘要

背景

部分肾切除术 (PN) 通常被推荐用于 T1 期透明细胞肾细胞癌 (ccRCC),无论核分级如何。然而,对于 T1-ccRCC 中复发风险较高的患者,PN 是否不劣于 RN 仍未得到解决。事实上,我们发现,高核分级的患者接受 PN 治疗的预后比接受根治性肾切除术 (RN) 治疗的患者差。因此,本研究旨在评估 PN 和 RN 在四个核分级亚组中的作用与肿瘤学结局的关系。

方法

对三家中国泌尿外科中心的回顾性研究共纳入了 1714 例因散发性、单侧、pT1、N0 和 M0 ccRCC 而接受 PN 或 RN 治疗的患者,这些患者在无阳性手术切缘和新辅助治疗的情况下,于 2010 年至 2019 年间接受了手术治疗。采用 Kaplan-Meier 方法和多变量 Cox 比例风险回归模型评估肾切除术类型与局部同侧复发、远处转移和全因死亡率 (ACM) 之间的关系,然后进行重叠加权 (OW)。

结果

共有 1675 例患者进入 OW 队列。OW 后,与 PN 相比,RN 与 G2 亚组 (HR=0.148, 95%CI 0.046-0.474; p<0.05)、G3 亚组 (HR=0.097, 95%CI 0.021-0.455; p<0.05) 和 G4 亚组 (HR=0.091, 95%CI 0.011-0.736; p<0.05) 的局部同侧复发风险降低相关,并且导致局部无复发生存率分别提高了 7.0%、17.9%和 36.2%。还观察到,与 RN 相关的 G4 亚组远处转移风险降低 (HR=0.071, 95%CI 0.016-0.325; p<0.05),远处无转移生存率提高了 33.1%。在 ACM 方面,PN 和 RN 之间无显著差异。

结论

我们的研究结果证实,对于高核分级(尤其是 G4)pT1-ccRCC 患者,选择 RN 而非 PN 更有利于局部无复发生存和远处无转移生存。我们建议加强术前核分级评估,因为这可以显著影响手术方案的选择。

试验注册

本研究在中国临床试验注册中心注册(注册号:ChiCTR2200063333)。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3816/10804783/7ba5bf209ff9/12957_2024_3302_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验