• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估医院出院数据中孕妇特定残疾和疾病的识别准确性。

Assessment of the Accuracy of Identification of Selected Disabilities and Conditions in Hospital Discharge Data for Pregnant Women.

机构信息

From the CHOICE Institute, University of Washington School of Pharmacy, Seattle, WA.

Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA.

出版信息

Epidemiology. 2020 Sep;31(5):687-691. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0000000000001185.

DOI:10.1097/EDE.0000000000001185
PMID:32168020
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8323995/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Linked birth certificate-hospital discharge records are a valuable resource for examining pregnancy outcomes among women with disability conditions. Few studies relying on these data have been able to assess the accuracy of identification of preexisting disability conditions. We assessed the accuracy of International Classification of Diseases version 9 (ICD9) codes for identifying selected physical, sensory, and intellectual conditions that may result in disability. As ICD9 codes were utilized until recently in most states, this information is useful to inform analyses with these records.

METHODS

We reviewed 280 of 311 (90%) medical records of pregnant women with disabilities based on ICD9 codes and 390 of 8,337 (5%) records of pregnant women without disabilities who had deliveries at a large university medical center. We estimated sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive values (PPV) using the medical record as gold standard. We adjusted for verification bias using inverse probability weighting and imputation.

RESULTS

The estimated sensitivity of ICD9 codes to identify women with disabilities with deliveries 2009-2012 was 44%; PPV was 98%, improving over time. Although sensitivity was <50% for some conditions, PPVs were 87%-100% for all conditions except intellectual disability (67%). Many physical conditions had complete verification and no underreporting.

CONCLUSIONS

These results are helpful for new studies using historical data comparing outcomes among women with and without these conditions and to inform interpretation of results from earlier studies. Assessment of the accuracy of disabilities as identified by ICD version 10 codes is warranted.

摘要

背景

与医院出院记录相关联的出生证明是检查残疾女性妊娠结局的宝贵资源。很少有研究能够依赖这些数据来评估预先存在的残疾状况的识别准确性。我们评估了国际疾病分类第 9 版(ICD9)代码用于识别可能导致残疾的特定身体、感觉和智力状况的准确性。由于 ICD9 代码在最近之前在大多数州都在使用,因此这些信息对于使用这些记录进行分析很有用。

方法

我们根据 ICD9 代码审查了 311 名残疾孕妇中有 280 名(90%)和 8337 名无残疾孕妇中有 390 名(5%)的病历,这些孕妇在一所大型大学医疗中心分娩。我们使用病历作为金标准来估计敏感性、特异性和阳性预测值(PPV)。我们使用逆概率加权和插补来调整验证偏差。

结果

2009-2012 年,ICD9 代码识别残疾孕妇分娩的估计敏感性为 44%;PPV 为 98%,随时间推移而提高。虽然某些情况下的敏感性<50%,但所有情况下的 PPV 均为 87%-100%,除智力残疾(67%)外。许多身体状况的验证完全,不存在漏报。

结论

这些结果对于使用历史数据比较有和无这些状况的女性的结局的新研究以及告知对早期研究结果的解释很有帮助。评估 ICD 第 10 版代码识别的残疾的准确性是有必要的。

相似文献

1
Assessment of the Accuracy of Identification of Selected Disabilities and Conditions in Hospital Discharge Data for Pregnant Women.评估医院出院数据中孕妇特定残疾和疾病的识别准确性。
Epidemiology. 2020 Sep;31(5):687-691. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0000000000001185.
2
The Validity of Discharge Billing Codes Reflecting Severe Maternal Morbidity.反映严重孕产妇发病情况的出院计费代码的有效性。
Anesth Analg. 2016 Sep;123(3):731-8. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000001436.
3
Risk of Adverse Maternal Outcomes in Pregnant Women With Disabilities.残疾孕妇不良母婴结局的风险。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Dec 1;4(12):e2138414. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.38414.
4
Time trends in births and cesarean deliveries among women with disabilities.残疾女性的分娩和剖宫产的时间趋势。
Disabil Health J. 2017 Jul;10(3):376-381. doi: 10.1016/j.dhjo.2017.02.009. Epub 2017 Apr 6.
5
Accuracy of Electronic Health Record Data for Identifying Stroke Cases in Large-Scale Epidemiological Studies: A Systematic Review from the UK Biobank Stroke Outcomes Group.大规模流行病学研究中电子健康记录数据用于识别中风病例的准确性:来自英国生物银行中风结局小组的系统评价
PLoS One. 2015 Oct 23;10(10):e0140533. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0140533. eCollection 2015.
6
Defining maternal obesity in studies of birth outcomes: Comparing ICD-9 codes at delivery and measures on the birth certificate.在研究分娩结局的研究中定义肥胖的母亲:比较分娩时的 ICD-9 编码和出生证明上的措施。
Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2020 Sep;34(5):618-627. doi: 10.1111/ppe.12667. Epub 2020 Mar 17.
7
Validation of Hypertensive Disorders During Pregnancy: ICD-10 Codes in a High-burden Southeastern United States Hospital.妊娠期高血压疾病的验证:美国东南部高负担医院的 ICD-10 编码。
Epidemiology. 2021 Jul 1;32(4):591-597. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0000000000001343.
8
The utility of ICD9-CM codes in identifying induction of labor.国际疾病分类第九版临床修订本(ICD9-CM)编码在识别引产中的效用。
Am J Perinatol. 2015 Apr;32(5):475-80. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1390351. Epub 2014 Sep 28.
9
Differences in Prenatal Care by Presence and Type of Maternal Disability.母亲残疾的有无和类型对产前护理的影响差异。
Am J Prev Med. 2019 Mar;56(3):376-382. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2018.10.021.
10
Position matters: Validation of medicare hospital claims for myocardial infarction against medical record review in the atherosclerosis risk in communities study.位置很重要:对社区动脉粥样硬化风险研究中医疗保险医院的心肌梗死索赔进行医学记录审查的验证。
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2018 Oct;27(10):1085-1091. doi: 10.1002/pds.4396. Epub 2018 Feb 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Identifying Pregnant Women With Disabilities and Maternal and Newborn Outcomes.识别残疾孕妇及其母婴结局。
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Mar 3;8(3):e252159. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.2159.
2
Birth Outcomes and Rehospitalizations Among Pregnant Women With Rheumatoid Arthritis and Systemic Lupus Erythematosus and Their Offspring.类风湿关节炎和系统性红斑狼疮孕妇及其后代的妊娠结局和再入院情况。
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2023 Sep;75(9):2022-2031. doi: 10.1002/acr.25087. Epub 2023 Mar 1.
3
Severe maternal morbidity and other perinatal complications among women with physical, sensory, or intellectual and developmental disabilities.身体、感官、智力和发育残疾妇女的严重产妇发病率和其他围产期并发症。
Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2022 Sep;36(5):759-768. doi: 10.1111/ppe.12873. Epub 2022 Apr 18.
4
Pregnancy outcomes among visually impaired women in Washington State, 1987-2014.华盛顿州视障女性 1987-2014 年的妊娠结局。
Disabil Health J. 2021 Jul;14(3):101057. doi: 10.1016/j.dhjo.2020.101057. Epub 2020 Dec 24.

本文引用的文献

1
Pregnancy course, infant outcomes, rehospitalization, and mortality among women with intellectual disability.智力残疾女性的妊娠过程、婴儿结局、再住院和死亡率。
Disabil Health J. 2019 Jul;12(3):452-459. doi: 10.1016/j.dhjo.2019.01.004. Epub 2019 Jan 20.
2
POINT: Is ICD-10 Diagnosis Coding Important in the Era of Big Data? Yes.观点:在大数据时代,国际疾病分类第十版(ICD - 10)诊断编码重要吗?答案是肯定的。
Chest. 2018 May;153(5):1093-1095. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2018.01.025. Epub 2018 Feb 2.
3
Validation of an ICD code for accurately identifying emergency department patients who suffer an out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.验证一种 ICD 代码,以准确识别在急诊科发生院外心脏骤停的患者。
Resuscitation. 2018 Apr;125:8-11. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2018.01.021. Epub 2018 Jan 16.
4
A Population-based Study of Perinatal Infection Risk in Women with and without Systemic Lupus Erythematosus and their Infants.一项关于患有和未患有系统性红斑狼疮的女性及其婴儿围产期感染风险的基于人群的研究。
Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2018 Jan;32(1):81-89. doi: 10.1111/ppe.12430. Epub 2017 Dec 1.
5
Association of endometrial hyperplasia and cancer with a history of gestational diabetes.子宫内膜增生和癌症与妊娠期糖尿病病史的关联。
Cancer Causes Control. 2017 Aug;28(8):819-828. doi: 10.1007/s10552-017-0908-9. Epub 2017 Jun 2.
6
Time trends in births and cesarean deliveries among women with disabilities.残疾女性的分娩和剖宫产的时间趋势。
Disabil Health J. 2017 Jul;10(3):376-381. doi: 10.1016/j.dhjo.2017.02.009. Epub 2017 Apr 6.
7
Birth outcomes among US women with intellectual and developmental disabilities.美国智力和发育障碍女性的分娩结局。
Disabil Health J. 2017 Jul;10(3):406-412. doi: 10.1016/j.dhjo.2017.02.010. Epub 2017 Apr 6.
8
Using Administrative Data to Ascertain True Cases of Muscular Dystrophy: Rare Disease Surveillance.利用行政数据确定肌营养不良症的真实病例:罕见病监测
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2017 Jan 12;3(1):e2. doi: 10.2196/publichealth.6720.
9
Patterns of gestational diabetes diagnosis inside and outside of clinical guidelines.临床指南内外的妊娠期糖尿病诊断模式
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017 Jan 6;17(1):11. doi: 10.1186/s12884-016-1191-6.
10
Birth Outcomes Among U.S. Women With Hearing Loss.美国听力损失女性的分娩结局
Am J Prev Med. 2016 Dec;51(6):865-873. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2016.08.001. Epub 2016 Sep 26.