Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Emory University School of Medicine, and the Department of Epidemiology, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia; and the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts.
Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Apr;135(4):799-807. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000003757.
To describe factors associated with not being tested for Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhea infection during pregnancy and for testing positive and to describe patterns of treatment and tests of reinfection.
We conducted a retrospective cohort study of women who delivered at an urban teaching hospital from July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2018. Women with at least one prenatal care or triage visit were included. The index delivery was included for women with multiple deliveries. We used logistic regression to analyze factors associated with not being tested and for testing positive for these infections in pregnancy. Cox proportional hazards models were used to examine factors associated with time to treatment and tests of reinfection. We reviewed medical records to determine reasons for delays in treatment longer than 1 week.
Among 3,265 eligible deliveries, 3,177 (97%) women were tested during pregnancy. Of these, 370 (12%) tested positive (287 chlamydia, 35 gonorrhea, 48 both), and 15% had repeat infections. Prenatal care adequacy and insurance status were risk factors for not being tested. Age, race and ethnicity, alcohol use, and sexually transmitted infection history were associated with testing positive. Time to treatment ranged from 0 to 221 days, with the majority (55%) of patients experiencing delays of more than 1 week. Common reasons for delays included lack of clinician recognition and follow-up of abnormal results (65%) and difficulty contacting the patient (33%).
Traditional risk factors are associated with increased risk of infection during pregnancy. Prenatal care adequacy and insurance status were associated with the likelihood of being tested. Delays in treatment and tests of reinfection were common. Point-of-care testing and expedited partner therapy should be explored as ways to improve the management of these infections in pregnancy.
描述与怀孕期间未进行沙眼衣原体和淋病奈瑟菌感染检测以及检测呈阳性相关的因素,并描述治疗和再感染检测模式。
我们对 2016 年 7 月 1 日至 2018 年 6 月 30 日在一家城市教学医院分娩的妇女进行了回顾性队列研究。纳入至少有一次产前保健或分诊就诊的妇女。对于多次分娩的妇女,纳入其索引分娩。我们使用逻辑回归分析与怀孕期间未进行这些感染检测和检测呈阳性相关的因素。使用 Cox 比例风险模型来研究与治疗和再感染检测时间相关的因素。我们查阅病历以确定治疗延迟超过 1 周的原因。
在 3265 例合格分娩中,有 3177 名(97%)妇女在怀孕期间接受了检测。其中 370 名(12%)检测呈阳性(287 例沙眼衣原体,35 例淋病奈瑟菌,48 例两者均阳性),15%有重复感染。产前保健充足度和保险状况是未进行检测的危险因素。年龄、种族和民族、饮酒和性传播感染史与检测呈阳性相关。治疗时间从 0 到 221 天不等,大多数患者(55%)的延迟超过 1 周。延迟的常见原因包括临床医生未识别和未跟进异常结果(65%)以及难以联系患者(33%)。
传统的危险因素与怀孕期间感染风险增加有关。产前保健充足度和保险状况与检测的可能性相关。治疗和再感染检测的延迟很常见。应探索即时检测和加速伴侣治疗作为改善妊娠期间这些感染管理的方法。