• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

降压治疗预防心血管结局和降低血压的疗效中的性别差异:系统评价和荟萃分析的方案。

Sex differences in the efficacy of antihypertensive treatment in preventing cardiovascular outcomes and reducing blood pressure: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis.

机构信息

Medicine, Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Canada.

Cardiology, Queen Elizabeth Health Complex, Montreal, Canada.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2020 Mar 12;10(3):e036128. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-036128.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2019-036128
PMID:32169929
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7069325/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Hypertension is a leading cause of mortality worldwide and its prevalence is expected to rise over the next decade. Sex differences exist in the epidemiology and pathophysiology of hypertension. It is well established that antihypertensive treatment can significantly reduce the risk for stroke and other cardiovascular disease events. However, it remains unclear whether this effect is dependent on sex. In this protocol, we outlined a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the effects of antihypertensive therapy in (1) reducing blood pressure and (2) preventing cardiovascular morbidity and mortality outcomes for each sex separately.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

The following electronic databases will be searched: Medline, Embase, The Cochrane Library, PubMed, Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature Plus, Web of Science, grey literature (Google Scholar) and several trial registries. Search strategies will be designed to identify human adult (≥18) randomised (and non-randomised) controlled trials, prospective and retrospective cohort studies, and case-control studies concerning 'sex-specific differences associated with the efficacy of antihypertensive treatment'. A preliminary search strategy was developed for Medline (1946-16 September 2019). Two investigators will independently review each article included in the final analysis. Primary outcomes investigated are cardiovascular morbidity and mortality and systolic and diastolic blood pressure. Pooled analyses will be conducted using the random-effects model. Publication bias will be assessed by visual inspection of funnel plots and by Begg's and Egger's statistical tests. Between-studies heterogeneity will be measured using the I test (p<0.10). Sources of heterogeneity will be explored by sensitivity, subgroup and metaregression analyses.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

This is the first meta-analysis that will comprehensively compare the efficacy of antihypertensive treatment regimens between men and women. Findings will be shared through scientific conferences and societies, social media and consumer advocacy groups. Results will be used to inform the current guidelines for management of hypertension in men and women by demonstrating the importance of implementing sex-specific recommendations. Ethical considerations are not applicable for this protocol.

摘要

简介

高血压是全球范围内导致死亡的主要原因,预计在未来十年内其患病率将会上升。高血压的流行病学和病理生理学存在性别差异。已有研究证实,降压治疗可以显著降低中风和其他心血管疾病事件的风险。然而,目前尚不清楚这种效果是否依赖于性别。在本方案中,我们概述了一项系统评价和荟萃分析,以评估降压治疗在(1)降低血压和(2)预防心血管发病率和死亡率方面对男性和女性的效果。

方法和分析

将对以下电子数据库进行检索:Medline、Embase、The Cochrane Library、PubMed、护理学和联合健康文献累积索引加 Web of Science、灰色文献(Google Scholar)和几个试验注册处。将设计搜索策略以确定与“降压治疗效果的性别特异性差异相关”的人类成年(≥18 岁)随机(和非随机)对照试验、前瞻性和回顾性队列研究以及病例对照研究。已经为 Medline(1946 年至 2019 年 9 月 16 日)制定了初步的搜索策略。两名调查员将独立审查最终分析中包含的每篇文章。主要研究结果为心血管发病率和死亡率以及收缩压和舒张压。将使用随机效应模型进行汇总分析。通过视觉检查漏斗图和 Begg 和 Egger 统计检验评估发表偏倚。通过 I 检验(p<0.10)测量研究间异质性。通过敏感性分析、亚组分析和荟萃回归分析探索异质性来源。

伦理和传播

这是首次全面比较降压治疗方案在男性和女性中的疗效的荟萃分析。研究结果将通过科学会议和学会、社交媒体和消费者权益团体进行分享。结果将用于告知目前男性和女性高血压管理指南,通过展示实施性别特异性建议的重要性。本方案不需要进行伦理考虑。

相似文献

1
Sex differences in the efficacy of antihypertensive treatment in preventing cardiovascular outcomes and reducing blood pressure: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis.降压治疗预防心血管结局和降低血压的疗效中的性别差异:系统评价和荟萃分析的方案。
BMJ Open. 2020 Mar 12;10(3):e036128. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-036128.
2
Prevalence and factors associated with medication adherence among patients with hypertension in sub-Saharan Africa: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis.撒哈拉以南非洲高血压患者的药物依从性及其相关因素:系统评价与荟萃分析方案
BMJ Open. 2018 Mar 16;8(3):e020715. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020715.
3
Effect of febuxostat on blood pressure in hyperuricemic patients: A protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis.非布司他对高尿酸血症患者血压的影响:一项系统评价和荟萃分析方案
Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Jun 12;99(24):e20673. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000020673.
4
Thiazide diuretics alone or in combination with a potassium-sparing diuretic on blood pressure-lowering in patients with primary hypertension: protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis.噻嗪类利尿剂单独或与保钾利尿剂联合用于原发性高血压患者的降压治疗:系统评价和网络荟萃分析方案。
Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 8;11(1):23. doi: 10.1186/s13643-022-01890-y.
5
Combined antihypertensive and statin therapy for the prevention of cardiovascular events in patients with hypertension without complications: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis.联合降压与他汀类药物治疗预防无并发症高血压患者心血管事件:系统评价与荟萃分析方案
BMJ Open. 2018 May 31;8(5):e019719. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019719.
6
The efficacy of angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors versus angiotensin II receptor blockers on insulin resistance in hypertensive patients: A protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis.血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂与血管紧张素II受体阻滞剂对高血压患者胰岛素抵抗的疗效:一项系统评价和荟萃分析方案
Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Jun 12;99(24):e20674. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000020674.
7
Bioactive scaffolds in stem-cell-based therapies for cardiac repair: protocol for a meta-analysis of randomized controlled preclinical trials in animal myocardial infarction models.基于干细胞的心脏修复治疗中的生物活性支架:动物心肌梗死模型中随机对照临床前试验的荟萃分析方案。
Syst Rev. 2018 Dec 5;7(1):225. doi: 10.1186/s13643-018-0845-z.
8
Comparative efficacy and acceptability of different antihypertensive drug classes for cardiovascular disease prevention: protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis.不同降压药类别预防心血管疾病的疗效和可接受性比较:系统评价和网络荟萃分析方案。
BMJ Open. 2021 Mar 29;11(3):e044302. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-044302.
9
First-line drugs inhibiting the renin angiotensin system versus other first-line antihypertensive drug classes for hypertension.用于治疗高血压的一线肾素血管紧张素系统抑制剂与其他一线抗高血压药物类别对比
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Jan 11;1:CD008170. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008170.pub2.
10
Pharmacological interventions for hypertension in children.儿童高血压的药物干预措施。
Evid Based Child Health. 2014 Sep;9(3):498-580. doi: 10.1002/ebch.1974.

本文引用的文献

1
Hypertension Canada's 2018 Guidelines for Diagnosis, Risk Assessment, Prevention, and Treatment of Hypertension in Adults and Children.加拿大高血压学会 2018 年成人和儿童高血压诊断、风险评估、预防和治疗指南。
Can J Cardiol. 2018 May;34(5):506-525. doi: 10.1016/j.cjca.2018.02.022. Epub 2018 Mar 1.
2
Hypertension Across a Woman's Life Cycle.女性生命周期中的高血压
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018 Apr 24;71(16):1797-1813. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.02.033.
3
Outcome standardization to blood pressure reduction in meta-analyses: sailing in uncharted waters.Meta分析中血压降低结果的标准化:在未知水域航行。
J Hypertens. 2018 Jan;36(1):31-33. doi: 10.1097/HJH.0000000000001610.
4
Standardization according to blood pressure lowering in meta-analyses of antihypertensive trials: comparison of three methodological approaches.根据降压的荟萃分析对血压进行标准化:三种方法学方法的比较。
J Hypertens. 2018 Jan;36(1):4-15. doi: 10.1097/HJH.0000000000001574.
5
Mechanistic Pathways of Sex Differences in Cardiovascular Disease.心血管疾病中性别差异的机制途径。
Physiol Rev. 2017 Jan;97(1):1-37. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00021.2015.
6
Cardiovascular Disease in Women: Clinical Perspectives.女性心血管疾病:临床视角
Circ Res. 2016 Apr 15;118(8):1273-93. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.116.307547.
7
Blood pressure lowering for prevention of cardiovascular disease and death: a systematic review and meta-analysis.降压预防心血管疾病和死亡:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Lancet. 2016 Mar 5;387(10022):957-967. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)01225-8. Epub 2015 Dec 24.
8
Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics-2016 Update: A Report From the American Heart Association.《2016年心脏病和中风统计数据更新:美国心脏协会报告》
Circulation. 2016 Jan 26;133(4):e38-360. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000350. Epub 2015 Dec 16.
9
Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation.系统评价和荟萃分析议定书的首选报告项目(PRISMA-P)2015:详细说明和解释。
BMJ. 2015 Jan 2;350:g7647. doi: 10.1136/bmj.g7647.
10
Treatment of mild to moderate hypertension by gender perspective: a systematic review.从性别角度治疗轻中度高血压:系统评价。
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2009 Jul;18(7):1049-62. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2008.0992.