Suppr超能文献

三药联合疗法与青蒿素类复方疗法治疗无并发症恶性疟原虫疟疾的比较:一项多中心、开放标签、随机临床试验。

Triple artemisinin-based combination therapies versus artemisinin-based combination therapies for uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum malaria: a multicentre, open-label, randomised clinical trial.

机构信息

Mahidol-Oxford Tropical Medicine Research Unit, Faculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand; Centre for Tropical Medicine and Global Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK; Center of Tropical Medicine and Travel Medicine, Department of Infectious Diseases, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.

Mahidol-Oxford Tropical Medicine Research Unit, Faculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand; Centre for Tropical Medicine and Global Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.

出版信息

Lancet. 2020 Apr 25;395(10233):1345-1360. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30552-3. Epub 2020 Mar 11.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Artemisinin and partner-drug resistance in Plasmodium falciparum are major threats to malaria control and elimination. Triple artemisinin-based combination therapies (TACTs), which combine existing co-formulated ACTs with a second partner drug that is slowly eliminated, might provide effective treatment and delay emergence of antimalarial drug resistance.

METHODS

In this multicentre, open-label, randomised trial, we recruited patients with uncomplicated P falciparum malaria at 18 hospitals and health clinics in eight countries. Eligible patients were aged 2-65 years, with acute, uncomplicated P falciparum malaria alone or mixed with non-falciparum species, and a temperature of 37·5°C or higher, or a history of fever in the past 24 h. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to one of two treatments using block randomisation, depending on their location: in Thailand, Cambodia, Vietnam, and Myanmar patients were assigned to either dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine or dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine plus mefloquine; at three sites in Cambodia they were assigned to either artesunate-mefloquine or dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine plus mefloquine; and in Laos, Myanmar, Bangladesh, India, and the Democratic Republic of the Congo they were assigned to either artemether-lumefantrine or artemether-lumefantrine plus amodiaquine. All drugs were administered orally and doses varied by drug combination and site. Patients were followed-up weekly for 42 days. The primary endpoint was efficacy, defined by 42-day PCR-corrected adequate clinical and parasitological response. Primary analysis was by intention to treat. A detailed assessment of safety and tolerability of the study drugs was done in all patients randomly assigned to treatment. This study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02453308, and is complete.

FINDINGS

Between Aug 7, 2015, and Feb 8, 2018, 1100 patients were given either dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine (183 [17%]), dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine plus mefloquine (269 [24%]), artesunate-mefloquine (73 [7%]), artemether-lumefantrine (289 [26%]), or artemether-lumefantrine plus amodiaquine (286 [26%]). The median age was 23 years (IQR 13 to 34) and 854 (78%) of 1100 patients were male. In Cambodia, Thailand, and Vietnam the 42-day PCR-corrected efficacy after dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine plus mefloquine was 98% (149 of 152; 95% CI 94 to 100) and after dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine was 48% (67 of 141; 95% CI 39 to 56; risk difference 51%, 95% CI 42 to 59; p<0·0001). Efficacy of dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine plus mefloquine in the three sites in Myanmar was 91% (42 of 46; 95% CI 79 to 98) versus 100% (42 of 42; 95% CI 92 to 100) after dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine (risk difference 9%, 95% CI 1 to 17; p=0·12). The 42-day PCR corrected efficacy of dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine plus mefloquine (96% [68 of 71; 95% CI 88 to 99]) was non-inferior to that of artesunate-mefloquine (95% [69 of 73; 95% CI 87 to 99]) in three sites in Cambodia (risk difference 1%; 95% CI -6 to 8; p=1·00). The overall 42-day PCR-corrected efficacy of artemether-lumefantrine plus amodiaquine (98% [281 of 286; 95% CI 97 to 99]) was similar to that of artemether-lumefantrine (97% [279 of 289; 95% CI 94 to 98]; risk difference 2%, 95% CI -1 to 4; p=0·30). Both TACTs were well tolerated, although early vomiting (within 1 h) was more frequent after dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine plus mefloquine (30 [3·8%] of 794) than after dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine (eight [1·5%] of 543; p=0·012). Vomiting after artemether-lumefantrine plus amodiaquine (22 [1·3%] of 1703) and artemether-lumefantrine (11 [0·6%] of 1721) was infrequent. Adding amodiaquine to artemether-lumefantrine extended the electrocardiogram corrected QT interval (mean increase at 52 h compared with baseline of 8·8 ms [SD 18·6] vs 0·9 ms [16·1]; p<0·01) but adding mefloquine to dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine did not (mean increase of 22·1 ms [SD 19·2] for dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine vs 20·8 ms [SD 17·8] for dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine plus mefloquine; p=0·50).

INTERPRETATION

Dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine plus mefloquine and artemether-lumefantrine plus amodiaquine TACTs are efficacious, well tolerated, and safe treatments of uncomplicated P falciparum malaria, including in areas with artemisinin and ACT partner-drug resistance.

FUNDING

UK Department for International Development, Wellcome Trust, Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, UK Medical Research Council, and US National Institutes of Health.

摘要

背景

疟原虫对青蒿素及其联合用药的耐药性是疟疾防控和消除的主要威胁。三重青蒿素类复方疗法(TACT)结合了现有固定剂量复方青蒿素类药物和一种缓慢消除的二线联合用药,可以提供有效的治疗,并延缓抗疟药物耐药性的出现。

方法

在这项多中心、开放标签、随机试验中,我们在 8 个国家的 18 家医院和诊所招募了患有无并发症恶性疟原虫疟疾的患者。纳入的患者年龄在 2-65 岁之间,患有急性、无并发症的恶性疟原虫疟疾,或伴有非恶性疟原虫物种,且体温在 37.5°C 或以上,或在过去 24 小时内有发热史。根据患者所在地,使用区组随机化将其随机分配(1:1)至两种治疗方案之一:在泰国、柬埔寨、越南和缅甸的患者被分配至双氢青蒿素-哌喹或双氢青蒿素-哌喹加甲氟喹;在柬埔寨的 3 个地点的患者被分配至青蒿琥酯-甲氟喹或双氢青蒿素-哌喹加甲氟喹;在老挝、缅甸、孟加拉国、印度和刚果民主共和国的患者被分配至青蒿琥酯-甲氟喹或青蒿琥酯-甲氟喹加阿莫地喹。所有药物均口服给药,且药物组合和地点不同,剂量也有所不同。患者在 42 天内每周进行随访。主要终点是 42 天 PCR 校正的充分临床和寄生虫学缓解率。主要分析采用意向治疗。对所有随机分配至治疗的患者进行了详细的安全性和耐受性评估。本研究在 ClinicalTrials.gov 上注册,编号为 NCT02453308,现已完成。

发现

2015 年 8 月 7 日至 2018 年 2 月 8 日,1100 名患者接受了双氢青蒿素-哌喹(183[17%])、双氢青蒿素-哌喹加甲氟喹(269[24%])、青蒿琥酯-甲氟喹(73[7%])、青蒿琥酯-甲氟喹加阿莫地喹(286[26%])或青蒿琥酯-甲氟喹加阿莫地喹(286[26%])。中位年龄为 23 岁(IQR 13-34),1100 名患者中有 854 名(78%)为男性。在柬埔寨、泰国和越南,双氢青蒿素-哌喹加甲氟喹的 42 天 PCR 校正疗效为 98%(149/152;95%CI 94-100),而双氢青蒿素-哌喹的疗效为 48%(67/141;95%CI 39-56;风险差 51%,95%CI 42-59;p<0·0001)。在缅甸的 3 个地点,双氢青蒿素-哌喹加甲氟喹的疗效为 91%(42/46;95%CI 79-98),而双氢青蒿素-哌喹的疗效为 100%(42/42;95%CI 92-100)(风险差 9%,95%CI 1-17;p=0·12)。双氢青蒿素-哌喹加甲氟喹的 42 天 PCR 校正疗效为 96%(68/71;95%CI 88-99),与柬埔寨 3 个地点的青蒿琥酯-甲氟喹(95%[69/73;95%CI 87-99])相当(风险差 1%,95%CI -6-8;p=1·00)。青蒿琥酯-甲氟喹加阿莫地喹(98%[281/286;95%CI 97-99])和青蒿琥酯-甲氟喹(97%[279/289;95%CI 94-98])的 42 天 PCR 校正总疗效相似(风险差 2%,95%CI -1-4;p=0·30)。两种 TACT 均耐受良好,尽管双氢青蒿素-哌喹加甲氟喹(794 例中 30 例[3.8%])早期呕吐(1 小时内)更为常见,而双氢青蒿素-哌喹(543 例中 8 例[1.5%])(p=0·012)。青蒿琥酯-甲氟喹加阿莫地喹(1703 例中 22 例[1.3%])和青蒿琥酯-甲氟喹(1721 例中 11 例[0.6%])的呕吐较为少见。加用阿莫地喹会延长青蒿琥酯-甲氟喹的心电图校正 QT 间期(与基线相比,52 小时时的平均增加为 8.8ms[SD 18.6]与 0.9ms[16.1];p<0·01),但加用甲氟喹不会延长双氢青蒿素-哌喹的 QT 间期(双氢青蒿素-哌喹的平均增加为 22.1ms[SD 19.2],双氢青蒿素-哌喹加甲氟喹为 20.8ms[SD 17.8];p=0·50)。

解释

双氢青蒿素-哌喹加甲氟喹和青蒿琥酯-甲氟喹加阿莫地喹 TACT 是治疗无并发症恶性疟原虫疟疾的有效、耐受良好且安全的治疗方法,包括在存在青蒿素和 ACT 联合用药耐药的地区。

资金来源

英国国际发展部、威康信托基金会、比尔及梅琳达·盖茨基金会、英国医学研究理事会和美国国立卫生研究院。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aded/8204272/468c5c930570/gr1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验