Pons-Rodríguez Anna, Martínez-Alonso Montserrat, Perestelo-Pérez Lilisbeth, Garcia Montse, Sala Maria, Rué Montserrat
Área Básica de Salud Eixample, Institut Català de la Salut, Lleida, España.
Departament de Ciències Mèdiques Bàsiques, Universitat de Lleida - Institut de Recerca Biomèdica de Lleida (IRB Lleida), Lleida, España; Grup de Recerca en Anàlisi Estadística i Econòmica en Salut (GRAEES), España.
Gac Sanit. 2021 May-Jun;35(3):243-249. doi: 10.1016/j.gaceta.2020.01.002. Epub 2020 Mar 12.
To evaluate the effect of receiving information about the benefits and harms of breast cancer screening in informed choice, according to educational level.
Secondary analysis of a randomized, controlled study, in four screening programs, in Catalonia and the Canary Islands (Spain). We analyzed 400 women who were going to be invited to participate for the first time. The intervention group received a decision aid that showed the benefits and harms of screening. The control group received a standard brochure that recommended participating in the screening program. Educational level was grouped into two categories, low and high. The primary outcome was informed choice defined as adequate knowledge and consistency between attitudes and intentions.
The intervention produced a greater increase in knowledge in women with a high educational level compared to those with a lower educational level. Among women who received the intervention, informed choice was almost three times higher in those with a high educational level (27% versus 11%). No differences were observed between educational levels in decisional conflict, confidence in the decision, anxiety and worry about breast cancer, in the intervention and control groups.
A decision aid for breast cancer screening had much more impact on informed choice among women with a high educational level. In women with low educational level, the attitude towards screening improved and there was an increase in the intention to be screened.
根据教育水平评估在知情选择中接受乳腺癌筛查利弊信息的效果。
对西班牙加泰罗尼亚和加那利群岛四个筛查项目中的一项随机对照研究进行二次分析。我们分析了400名首次被邀请参与的女性。干预组收到一份展示筛查利弊的决策辅助工具。对照组收到一份推荐参与筛查项目的标准手册。教育水平分为低和高两类。主要结局是知情选择,定义为足够的知识以及态度与意图之间的一致性。
与教育水平较低的女性相比,干预措施使教育水平较高的女性知识增加幅度更大。在接受干预的女性中,教育水平高的女性知情选择几乎高出三倍(27%对11%)。在干预组和对照组中,教育水平在决策冲突、对决策的信心、对乳腺癌的焦虑和担忧方面未观察到差异。
乳腺癌筛查的决策辅助工具对教育水平高的女性的知情选择影响更大。教育水平低的女性对筛查的态度有所改善,且筛查意愿有所增加。