Suppr超能文献

乳腺钼靶检查利弊信息对女性决策的影响:一项随机对照试验的研究方案

The effect of information about the benefits and harms of mammography on women's decision-making: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

作者信息

Carles Misericòrdia, Martínez-Alonso Montserrat, Pons Anna, Pérez-Lacasta Maria José, Perestelo-Pérez Lilisbeth, Sala Maria, Vidal Carmen, Garcia Montse, Toledo-Chávarri Ana, Codern Núria, Feijoo-Cid Maria, Romero Anabel, Pla Roger, Soler-González Jorge, Castells Xavier, Rué Montserrat

机构信息

Department of Economics, University Rovira i Virgili, Reus, Spain.

Research Group on Economic Evaluation and Health (GRAES), Reus, Spain.

出版信息

Trials. 2017 Sep 12;18(1):426. doi: 10.1186/s13063-017-2161-7.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The decision to participate or not in breast cancer screening is complex due to the trade-off between the expected benefit of breast cancer mortality reduction and the major harm of overdiagnosis. It seems ethically necessary to inform women so that they can actively participate in decision-making and make an informed choice based on their values and preferences. The objective of this study is to assess the effects of receiving information about the benefits and harms of screening on decision-making, in women approaching the age of invitation to mammography screening.

METHODS

A two-stage, randomized controlled trial (RCT). In the first stage, 40 Basic Health Areas (BHAs) will be selected and randomized to intervention or control. In the second stage, women within each BHA will be randomly selected (n = 400). Four breast cancer screening programs (BCSPs) of the Spanish public health system, three in Catalonia and one in the Canary Islands will participate in the study. Women in the intervention arm will receive a leaflet with detailed information on the benefits and harms of screening using mammography. Women in the control arm will receive a standard leaflet that does not mention harms and recommends accepting the invitation to participate in the biennial examinations of the BCSP. The primary outcome is informed choice, a dichotomous variable that combines knowledge, attitudes, and intentions. Secondary outcomes include decisional conflict; confidence in the decision made; anxiety about screening participation; worry about breast cancer; anticipated regret; time perspective; perceived importance of benefits/harms of screening; perceived risk of breast cancer; and leaflet acceptability. Primary and secondary outcomes are assessed 2-3 weeks after the intervention.

DISCUSSION

This is the first RCT that assesses the effect of informing about the benefits and harms of breast cancer screening in Spain in women facing the decision to be screened using mammography. It aims to assess the impact of information on several decisional outcomes and to contribute to paving the road towards shared decision-making in breast cancer screening in our country.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov registry, ID: NCT03046004 . Retrospectively registered on 4 February 2017. Trial name: InforMa study.

摘要

背景

由于在降低乳腺癌死亡率的预期益处与过度诊断的主要危害之间需要权衡,决定是否参与乳腺癌筛查是一个复杂的问题。从伦理角度看,告知女性相关信息似乎很有必要,这样她们就能积极参与决策,并根据自己的价值观和偏好做出明智的选择。本研究的目的是评估在接近乳房X线筛查邀请年龄的女性中,接受关于筛查益处和危害的信息对决策的影响。

方法

一项两阶段随机对照试验(RCT)。在第一阶段,将选择40个基本卫生区(BHA)并随机分为干预组或对照组。在第二阶段,将从每个BHA中随机选择女性(n = 400)。西班牙公共卫生系统的四个乳腺癌筛查项目(BCSP),其中三个在加泰罗尼亚,一个在加那利群岛,将参与该研究。干预组的女性将收到一份传单,其中包含使用乳房X线检查进行筛查的益处和危害的详细信息。对照组的女性将收到一份标准传单,该传单不提及危害,并建议接受邀请参加BCSP的两年一次检查。主要结局是明智选择,这是一个将知识、态度和意图结合在一起的二分变量。次要结局包括决策冲突;对所做决策的信心;对参与筛查的焦虑;对乳腺癌的担忧;预期遗憾;时间观念;对筛查益处/危害的感知重要性;对乳腺癌的感知风险;以及传单可接受性。在干预后2至3周评估主要和次要结局。

讨论

这是第一项评估在西班牙面临使用乳房X线检查进行筛查决策的女性中,告知乳腺癌筛查益处和危害的效果的随机对照试验。其目的是评估信息对多个决策结局的影响,并为在我国乳腺癌筛查中实现共同决策铺平道路。

试验注册

ClinicalTrials.gov注册库,ID:NCT03046004。于2017年2月4日追溯注册。试验名称:InforMa研究。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/579e/5596499/93537c096167/13063_2017_2161_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验