Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine of Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio.
Department of Vascular Surgery, Heart and Vascular Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.
J Vasc Surg. 2020 Oct;72(4):1360-1366. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2019.12.040. Epub 2020 Mar 12.
This study reports the clinical impact of iliac artery aneurysms (IAAs) in a population of patients with juxtarenal and thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms being treated with fenestrated or branched aortic endografts.
Data from 364 patients with IAA (33%) were extracted from the 1118 patients treated for juxtarenal or thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms with a fenestrated or branched aortic endograft in a physician-sponsored investigational device exemption trial (2001-2016). IAAs were defined as ≥21 mm in diameter, as measured by an imaging core laboratory. Outcomes were assessed by univariate and multivariable analysis.
IAAs were unilateral in 219 (60%) and bilateral in 145 (40%) of the 364 patients. Treatment was iliac leg endoprosthesis without coverage of the hypogastric artery (seal distal to the IAA in the common iliac artery), placement of a hypogastric branched endograft in 105 (21%), and hypogastric artery coverage with extension into the external iliac artery in 103 (20%); 67 (13%) were untreated. Procedure duration was longer for those with IAA (5.3 ± 1.79 hours vs 4.6 ± 1.74 hours; P < .001), although hospital stay was not. There was no difference in aneurysm-related mortality and all-cause mortality for patients with unilateral and bilateral IAAs compared with those without an IAA. Treatment of patients with a hypogastric branched endograft had similar all-cause mortality compared with treatment of patients without a hypogastric branched endograft but also with an IAA. Reintervention rates were significantly higher in those with bilateral IAAs compared with no IAA (hazard ratio, 1.886; P < .001). Spinal cord ischemia trended higher in patients with bilateral IAA.
IAA management at the time of fenestrated or branched endovascular aneurysm repair increases procedure time without increasing hospitalization. The reintervention rate and spinal cord ischemia rate are higher in patients with bilateral IAA compared with those with no IAA.
本研究报告了在接受腔内分支型主动脉覆膜支架治疗的肾下型和胸腹主动脉瘤患者中,髂动脉瘤(IAAs)的临床影响。
从接受腔内分支型主动脉覆膜支架治疗的 1118 例肾下型或胸腹主动脉瘤患者(2001-2016 年)的数据中提取了 364 例(33%)IAAs 患者的数据。IAAs 的定义为通过影像核心实验室测量的直径≥21mm。通过单变量和多变量分析评估结局。
364 例患者中,219 例(60%)为单侧 IAA,145 例(40%)为双侧 IAA。治疗方法为髂内支覆膜支架,不覆盖髂内动脉(在髂总动脉内将封堵物置于 IAA 下方),105 例(21%)放置髂内分支覆膜支架,103 例(20%)行髂内动脉覆盖并延伸至髂外动脉;67 例(13%)未治疗。有 IAA 的患者手术时间较长(5.3±1.79 小时比 4.6±1.74 小时;P<0.001),但住院时间无差异。与无 IAA 的患者相比,单侧和双侧 IAA 患者的动脉瘤相关死亡率和全因死亡率无差异。与无髂内分支覆膜支架但有 IAA 的患者相比,接受髂内分支覆膜支架治疗的患者全因死亡率相似。与无 IAA 的患者相比,双侧 IAA 患者的再干预率显著更高(风险比,1.886;P<0.001)。双侧 IAA 患者的脊髓缺血发生率较高。
在接受腔内分支型主动脉覆膜支架治疗时,处理 IAA 会增加手术时间,但不会增加住院时间。与无 IAA 的患者相比,双侧 IAA 患者的再干预率和脊髓缺血率更高。