Department of Ophthalmology & Vision Sciences, University of California, Davis, Sacramento, California, USA.
Department of Ophthalmology & Vision Sciences, University of California, Davis, Sacramento, California, USA.
Am J Ophthalmol. 2020 Aug;216:243-256. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2020.03.002. Epub 2020 Mar 12.
To compare the outcomes of mitomycin-C (MMC) delivered by intra-Tenon injection vs sponge application during trabeculectomy surgery.
We retrospectively reviewed 566 patients with primary and secondary glaucoma diagnoses who received trabeculectomy surgery with MMC in an academic medical center. Exclusion criteria were age less than 18 years, no light perception vision, combined surgery, previous glaucoma incisional surgery, intraoperative 5-fluorouracil, or follow-up <1 month. Subjects were divided into 2 cohorts: MMC delivered by sponge application or by intra-Tenon injection. Main outcome measures were postoperative intraocular pressure (IOP) level and secondary measures were survival rate for IOP control, glaucoma medication use, complication rate, and vision.
After inclusion/exclusion criteria, 316 eyes were available for analysis; 131 eyes had MMC delivered via sponge and 185 eyes via injection. Mean postoperative IOP was not significantly different between treatment groups but change in IOP from baseline was lower in the sponge vs the injection group 24 months after surgery (P = .038). The MMC sponge group had significantly more tense, vascularized, or encapsulated blebs as a late complication (P = .046). Time to failure for postoperative IOP control was not significantly different between MMC treatment groups, but older patient age and limbus-based conjunctival incision were associated with significantly longer time to fail.
The application of MMC by injection was similar to application by sponge in lowering IOP in patients with glaucoma and the safety of both techniques appears to be comparable. Limbus-based conjunctival incision had longer time to failure for postoperative IOP control vs fornix-based incision. NOTE: Publication of this article is sponsored by the American Ophthalmological Society.
比较在小梁切除术时经 Tenon 囊内注射与海绵敷贴给予丝裂霉素 C(MMC)的效果。
我们回顾性分析了在一所学术医学中心接受小梁切除术并使用 MMC 的 566 例原发性和继发性青光眼患者。排除标准为年龄<18 岁、无光感、联合手术、既往青光眼切开术、术中使用 5-氟尿嘧啶、随访<1 个月。将患者分为 MMC 海绵敷贴组和经 Tenon 囊内注射组。主要观察指标为术后眼压(IOP)水平,次要观察指标为 IOP 控制的生存率、青光眼药物使用、并发症发生率和视力。
经纳入/排除标准后,316 只眼可用于分析;131 只眼接受 MMC 海绵敷贴,185 只眼接受 MMC 经 Tenon 囊内注射。治疗组间术后平均 IOP 无显著差异,但术后 24 个月时海绵组较注射组 IOP 从基线的变化更低(P=.038)。海绵组迟发性并发症中表现为紧张、血管化或包裹性的滤过泡显著更多(P=.046)。术后 IOP 控制失败的时间在 MMC 治疗组间无显著差异,但患者年龄较大和基于穹隆部的结膜切口与术后失败时间显著延长相关。
在降低青光眼患者的 IOP 方面,MMC 经注射应用与海绵敷贴相似,两种技术的安全性似乎相当。基于穹隆部的结膜切口较基于穹隆部的切口术后 IOP 控制失败时间更长。注:本文的发表由美国眼科学会赞助。