Weller Karsten, Donoso Tamara, Magerl Markus, Aygören-Pürsün Emel, Staubach Petra, Martinez-Saguer Inmaculada, Hawro Tomasz, Altrichter Sabine, Krause Karoline, Siebenhaar Frank, Metz Martin, Zuberbier Torsten, Freier Denise, Maurer Marcus
Dermatological Allergology, Allergie-Centrum-Charité, Department of Dermatology and Allergy, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Dermatological Allergology, Allergie-Centrum-Charité, Department of Dermatology and Allergy, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2020 Jun;8(6):2050-2057.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2020.02.038. Epub 2020 Mar 12.
Recurrent angioedema (RA) is an important clinical problem in routine care and emergency medicine. As of recently, the only validated tools to specifically assess disease status in patients with RA were diary-type activity assessments and angioedema-related quality-of-life questionnaires. Although these tools are particularly helpful in clinical studies, they were not designed to determine disease control or to guide treatment decisions. To close this gap, the Angioedema Control Test (AECT) was published recently.
To test the AECT for its validity and reliability, and to identify a cutoff value to aid treatment decisions.
Two AECT versions with a recall period of 4 weeks (AECT-4wk) and 3 months (AECT-3mo) were tested for their internal consistency and test-retest reliability, convergent and known-groups validity as well as screening accuracy in 81 patients with RA with bradykinin-mediated angioedema, mast cell mediator-mediated angioedema, or idiopathic angioedema.
Both AECT versions showed excellent internal consistency reliability with a Cronbach alpha value of more than 0.85 and test-retest reliability with an intraclass correlation coefficient greater than 0.9. The convergent validity of both AECT versions was high. Both tools showed strong correlations with anchors of disease control, angioedema frequency, and health-related quality of life. A stratification of AECT scores into different levels of disease control together with a receiver-operating characteristic curve analysis suggested a cutoff value of 10 or more points to identify patients with well-controlled RA versus less than 10 points to identify patients with poorly controlled disease for both AECT versions.
The AECT is the first valid and reliable patient-reported outcome measure to assess disease control in patients with RA.
复发性血管性水肿(RA)是常规护理和急诊医学中的一个重要临床问题。直到最近,用于特异性评估RA患者疾病状态的唯一经过验证的工具是日记式活动评估和血管性水肿相关生活质量问卷。尽管这些工具在临床研究中特别有用,但它们并非旨在确定疾病控制情况或指导治疗决策。为了填补这一空白,血管性水肿控制测试(AECT)最近已发布。
测试AECT的有效性和可靠性,并确定一个临界值以辅助治疗决策。
对两个回忆期分别为4周(AECT - 4wk)和3个月(AECT - 3mo)的AECT版本进行了测试,评估其内部一致性、重测可靠性、收敛效度和已知组效度,以及在81例患有缓激肽介导的血管性水肿、肥大细胞介质介导的血管性水肿或特发性血管性水肿的RA患者中的筛查准确性。
两个AECT版本均显示出出色的内部一致性可靠性,Cronbach α值大于0.85,重测可靠性的组内相关系数大于0.9。两个AECT版本的收敛效度都很高。这两个工具都与疾病控制指标、血管性水肿频率和健康相关生活质量密切相关。将AECT分数分层为不同的疾病控制水平,并结合受试者工作特征曲线分析表明,两个AECT版本的临界值均为10分或更高,以识别疾病控制良好的RA患者;低于10分则识别疾病控制不佳的患者。
AECT是首个有效且可靠的患者报告结局指标,用于评估RA患者的疾病控制情况。