• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

复发性血管性水肿的监测:土耳其血管性水肿控制试验验证研究的结果

Monitoring recurrent angioedema: Findings from the Turkish angioedema control test validation study.

作者信息

Demir Semra, Eyice-Karabacak Deniz, Kocatürk Emek, Ünal Derya, Toprak İlkim Deniz, Korkmaz Pelin, Aslan Ayşe Feyza, İmren Işıl Göğem, Dikicier Bahar, Kahveci Nevzat, Öztop Nida, Kara Rabia Öztaş, İşsever Halim, Maurer Marcus, Weller Karsten, Gelincik Aslı

机构信息

Division of Immunology and Allergy Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey.

Department of Dermatology, Koç University Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey.

出版信息

Clin Transl Allergy. 2024 Mar;14(3):e12342. doi: 10.1002/clt2.12342.

DOI:10.1002/clt2.12342
PMID:38415974
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10900914/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Determination of control level in recurrent angioedema (RAE) is necessary to guide management. Here, we validated a Turkish version of the angioedema control test (AECT) for 4-week (AECT-4wk) and for 3-month (AECT-3mth) and assessed their utility in monitoring RAE.

METHOD

The recommended structured translation process for patient-reported outcome measures was completed. The final versions were administered to 51 patients with mast cell-mediated angioedema (MMAE) and 38 patients with hereditary angioedema, and the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) was determined. Additionally, anchor surveys comprising angioedema activity score for 28 days (AAS-28 day), visual analog score for angioedema control, Likert scale for the control level from the patient's perspective (LS-AEC), angioedema quality of life, short form-12 (SF-12) and patients' assessment of treatment sufficiency were applied.

RESULTS

The Turkish AECT versions showed good convergent validity with a substantial correlation with anchor tools and known-group validity. Excellent internal consistency and reproducibility were observed. Equal or more than 10 of 16 points scored with the AECT-4wk and AECT-3mth identified patients with well-controlled disease. The disease activity, control and burden parameters were consistent with the disease control level defined depending on the cut-off point 10 of AECT. Three-point changes in AECT-4wk and -3 mt could detect MCID in disease control in all patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Turkish AECT versions are valid and reliable tools for assessing and monitoring disease control in patients with RAE. The use of the Turkish versions of the AECT in routine patient care, clinical trials and angioedema research is recommended.

摘要

背景

确定复发性血管性水肿(RAE)的控制水平对于指导治疗很有必要。在此,我们验证了土耳其语版的4周血管性水肿控制测试(AECT - 4wk)和3个月血管性水肿控制测试(AECT - 3mth),并评估了它们在监测RAE中的效用。

方法

完成了患者报告结局指标推荐的结构化翻译过程。最终版本应用于51例肥大细胞介导的血管性水肿(MMAE)患者和38例遗传性血管性水肿患者,并确定了最小临床重要差异(MCID)。此外,还进行了锚定调查,包括28天血管性水肿活动评分(AAS - 28天)、血管性水肿控制视觉模拟评分、患者视角的控制水平李克特量表(LS - AEC)、血管性水肿生活质量、简短健康调查简表12(SF - 12)以及患者对治疗充分性的评估。

结果

土耳其语版AECT与锚定工具具有良好的收敛效度,相关性显著,且具有已知组效度。观察到了出色的内部一致性和可重复性。AECT - 4wk和AECT - 3mth得分达到16分中的10分及以上表明疾病得到良好控制。疾病活动、控制和负担参数与根据AECT截止点10定义的疾病控制水平一致。AECT - 4wk和 - 3mth的三分变化能够检测出所有患者疾病控制中的MCID。

结论

土耳其语版AECT是评估和监测RAE患者疾病控制的有效且可靠工具。建议在常规患者护理、临床试验和血管性水肿研究中使用土耳其语版AECT。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7852/10900914/20ca016a92f1/CLT2-14-e12342-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7852/10900914/d04b36a055ca/CLT2-14-e12342-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7852/10900914/dd21fef5add3/CLT2-14-e12342-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7852/10900914/20ca016a92f1/CLT2-14-e12342-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7852/10900914/d04b36a055ca/CLT2-14-e12342-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7852/10900914/dd21fef5add3/CLT2-14-e12342-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7852/10900914/20ca016a92f1/CLT2-14-e12342-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Monitoring recurrent angioedema: Findings from the Turkish angioedema control test validation study.复发性血管性水肿的监测:土耳其血管性水肿控制试验验证研究的结果
Clin Transl Allergy. 2024 Mar;14(3):e12342. doi: 10.1002/clt2.12342.
2
Validation of the Angioedema Control Test (AECT)-A Patient-Reported Outcome Instrument for Assessing Angioedema Control.血管性水肿控制测试(AECT)的验证——一种用于评估血管性水肿控制情况的患者报告结局工具。
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2020 Jun;8(6):2050-2057.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2020.02.038. Epub 2020 Mar 12.
3
The validity and reliability of a Thai version of the Angioedema Control Test: Which recall period is preferable?泰国版血管性水肿控制测试的效度和信度:哪个回忆期更可取?
Asian Pac J Allergy Immunol. 2023 Jan 3. doi: 10.12932/AP-270822-1442.
4
Validation and correlations of the Angioedema Activity Score (AAS), Angioedema Quality of Life (AE-QoL) questionnaire, and Angioedema Control Test (AECT) in Chinese patients with angioedema.血管性水肿活动评分(AAS)、血管性水肿生活质量(AE-QoL)问卷及血管性水肿控制测试(AECT)在中国血管性水肿患者中的有效性及相关性
J Allergy Clin Immunol Glob. 2024 Jul 2;3(4):100295. doi: 10.1016/j.jacig.2024.100295. eCollection 2024 Nov.
5
Sensitivity to change and minimal clinically important difference of the angioedema control test.血管性水肿控制试验对变化的敏感性及最小临床重要差异
Clin Transl Allergy. 2023 Sep;13(9):e12295. doi: 10.1002/clt2.12295.
6
Development of the Angioedema Control Test-A patient-reported outcome measure that assesses disease control in patients with recurrent angioedema.血管性水肿控制测试的开发——一种患者报告的结局指标,用于评估复发性血管性水肿患者的疾病控制情况。
Allergy. 2020 May;75(5):1165-1177. doi: 10.1111/all.14144. Epub 2020 Mar 6.
7
Assessment of disease activity and quality of life in patients with recurrent bradykinin-mediated versus mast cell-mediated angioedema.复发性缓激肽介导与肥大细胞介导的血管性水肿患者的疾病活动度和生活质量评估
World Allergy Organ J. 2021 Jun 16;14(7):100554. doi: 10.1016/j.waojou.2021.100554. eCollection 2021 Jul.
8
Angioedema Activity Score (AAS): A Valid and Reliable Tool to Use in Asian Patients.血管性水肿活动评分(AAS):亚洲患者中使用的有效且可靠的工具。
Biomed Res Int. 2019 Oct 31;2019:9157895. doi: 10.1155/2019/9157895. eCollection 2019.
9
Clinical characteristics and burden of illness in patients with hereditary angioedema: findings from a multinational patient survey.遗传性血管性水肿患者的临床特征和疾病负担:一项多国患者调查的结果。
Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2021 Feb 18;16(1):94. doi: 10.1186/s13023-021-01717-4.
10
Angioedema quality of life questionnaire (AE-QoL) - interpretability and sensitivity to change.血管性水肿生活质量问卷 (AE-QoL) - 可解释性和对变化的敏感性。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2019 Oct 26;17(1):160. doi: 10.1186/s12955-019-1229-3.

本文引用的文献

1
Sensitivity to change and minimal clinically important difference of the angioedema control test.血管性水肿控制试验对变化的敏感性及最小临床重要差异
Clin Transl Allergy. 2023 Sep;13(9):e12295. doi: 10.1002/clt2.12295.
2
Managing Diagnosis, Treatment, and Burden of Disease in Hereditary Angioedema Patients with Normal C1-Esterase Inhibitor.管理C1酯酶抑制剂水平正常的遗传性血管性水肿患者的诊断、治疗和疾病负担
J Asthma Allergy. 2023 Apr 22;16:447-460. doi: 10.2147/JAA.S398333. eCollection 2023.
3
The validity and reliability of a Thai version of the Angioedema Control Test: Which recall period is preferable?
泰国版血管性水肿控制测试的效度和信度:哪个回忆期更可取?
Asian Pac J Allergy Immunol. 2023 Jan 3. doi: 10.12932/AP-270822-1442.
4
The international WAO/EAACI guideline for the management of hereditary angioedema-The 2021 revision and update.《遗传性血管性水肿管理的国际 WAO/EAACI 指南-2021 年修订版》。
Allergy. 2022 Jul;77(7):1961-1990. doi: 10.1111/all.15214. Epub 2022 Feb 3.
5
The international EAACI/GA²LEN/EuroGuiDerm/APAAACI guideline for the definition, classification, diagnosis, and management of urticaria.国际 EAACI/GA²LEN/EuroGuiDerm/APAAACI 荨麻疹定义、分类、诊断和管理指南。
Allergy. 2022 Mar;77(3):734-766. doi: 10.1111/all.15090. Epub 2021 Oct 20.
6
Assessment of disease activity and quality of life in patients with recurrent bradykinin-mediated versus mast cell-mediated angioedema.复发性缓激肽介导与肥大细胞介导的血管性水肿患者的疾病活动度和生活质量评估
World Allergy Organ J. 2021 Jun 16;14(7):100554. doi: 10.1016/j.waojou.2021.100554. eCollection 2021 Jul.
7
Definition, aims, and implementation of GA LEN/HAEi Angioedema Centers of Reference and Excellence.GA LEN/HAEi血管性水肿参考与卓越中心的定义、目标及实施
Allergy. 2020 Aug;75(8):2115-2123. doi: 10.1111/all.14293. Epub 2020 Apr 27.
8
Validation of the Angioedema Control Test (AECT)-A Patient-Reported Outcome Instrument for Assessing Angioedema Control.血管性水肿控制测试(AECT)的验证——一种用于评估血管性水肿控制情况的患者报告结局工具。
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2020 Jun;8(6):2050-2057.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2020.02.038. Epub 2020 Mar 12.
9
Development of the Angioedema Control Test-A patient-reported outcome measure that assesses disease control in patients with recurrent angioedema.血管性水肿控制测试的开发——一种患者报告的结局指标,用于评估复发性血管性水肿患者的疾病控制情况。
Allergy. 2020 May;75(5):1165-1177. doi: 10.1111/all.14144. Epub 2020 Mar 6.
10
Validation of the Turkish version of the Urticaria Control Test: Correlation with other tools and comparison between spontaneous and inducible chronic urticaria.荨麻疹控制测试土耳其语版本的验证:与其他工具的相关性以及自发性和诱导性慢性荨麻疹之间的比较。
World Allergy Organ J. 2019 Jan 26;12(1):100009. doi: 10.1016/j.waojou.2018.11.007. eCollection 2019.