Department of Frailty Research, Videbimus Clinic Research Center, Tokyo, Japan; Research Team for Social Participation and Community Health, Tokyo Metropolitan Institute of Gerontology, Tokyo, Japan.
Research Team for Social Participation and Community Health, Tokyo Metropolitan Institute of Gerontology, Tokyo, Japan; Center for Health and Environmental Risk Research, National Institute for Environmental Studies, Ibaraki, Japan.
Ageing Res Rev. 2020 May;59:101048. doi: 10.1016/j.arr.2020.101048. Epub 2020 Mar 12.
To examine the association of living alone with frailty in cross-sectional and longitudinal studies by a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Systematic review and meta-analysis.
Community-dwelling older adults with a mean age of >60 years.
A systematic search of the literature was conducted according to the PRISMA guidelines. We searched PubMed in February 2019 without language restriction for cohort studies that examined the associations between living alone and frailty. The reference lists of the relevant articles and the included articles were reviewed for additional studies. We calculated pooled odds ratios (OR) of the presence and incidence of frailty for living alone from cross-sectional and longitudinal studies.
Among the 203 studies identified, data of 44 cross-sectional studies (46 cohorts) and 6 longitudinal studies were included in this review. The meta-analysis showed that older adults living alone were more likely to be frail than those who were not (46 cohorts: pooled OR = 1.28, 95 % confidence interval (CI) = 1.13-1.45, p < 0.001). Gender-stratified analysis showed that only men living alone were at an increased risk of being frail (20 cohorts: pooled OR = 1.71, 95 %CI = 1.49-1.96), while women were not (22 cohorts: pooled OR = 1.00, 95 %CI = 0.83-1.20). No significant association was observed in a meta-analysis of longitudinal studies (6 cohorts: pooled OR = 0.88, 95 %CI = 0.76-1.03).
CONCLUSIONS/IMPLICATIONS: The present systematic review and meta-analysis showed a significant cross-sectional association between living alone and frailty, especially in men. However, living alone did not predict incident frailty. More studies controlling for important confounders, such as social networks, are needed to further enhance our understanding of how living alone is associated with frailty among older adults.
通过系统评价和荟萃分析,在横断面和纵向研究中检查独居与虚弱之间的关联。
系统评价和荟萃分析。
平均年龄 > 60 岁的社区居住的老年人。
根据 PRISMA 指南对文献进行系统搜索。我们于 2019 年 2 月在 PubMed 上进行了无语言限制的搜索,以查找研究独居与虚弱之间关系的队列研究。审查了相关文章和纳入文章的参考文献列表,以获取其他研究。我们从横断面和纵向研究中计算了独居与虚弱存在和发生的合并优势比(OR)。
在确定的 203 项研究中,纳入了 44 项横断面研究(46 个队列)和 6 项纵向研究的数据。荟萃分析表明,与非独居者相比,独居的老年人更容易虚弱(46 个队列:合并 OR = 1.28,95%置信区间(CI)= 1.13-1.45,p < 0.001)。性别分层分析显示,只有独居的男性患虚弱的风险增加(20 个队列:合并 OR = 1.71,95%CI = 1.49-1.96),而女性则没有(22 个队列:合并 OR = 1.00,95%CI = 0.83-1.20)。在纵向研究的荟萃分析中未观察到显著关联(6 个队列:合并 OR = 0.88,95%CI = 0.76-1.03)。
结论/意义:本系统评价和荟萃分析显示,独居与虚弱之间存在显著的横断面关联,尤其是在男性中。然而,独居并不能预测虚弱的发生。需要更多控制重要混杂因素(如社交网络)的研究来进一步提高我们对老年人独居与虚弱之间关系的理解。