Walravens Stig, Buylaert Walter, Steen Evi, De Paepe Peter
Department of Emergency Medicine, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.
Acta Clin Belg. 2021 Oct;76(5):359-364. doi: 10.1080/17843286.2020.1741228. Epub 2020 Mar 14.
: To test the feasibility of an evidence-based protocol for procedural sedation in adults at our emergency department, using a mixture of ketamine and propofol ('ketofol') in a 1 to 4 ratio. We hypothesize that the protocol is safe and effective and can facilitate procedural sedation.: During 14 months, adults in need of procedural sedation at our university hospital emergency department were included in a prospective convenience sample study. Patients with important comorbidity were discussed with the anaesthesiology department for feasibility of sedation in the emergency department setting. Outcome measures were procedural success, respiratory and hemodynamic events, vomiting, agitation or hallucinations, recall and physician's satisfaction.: Sixty-one patients between 18 and 89 years were included. All but one procedure were successful. Six respiratory events were registered in 6 patients (9.8%). These consisted of airway obstruction alleviated by airway repositioning and without influence on vital signs except for one brief episode of desaturation. Neither hemodynamic events nor vomiting were reported. Five patients (8.2%) experienced pleasant hallucinations and one patient (1.6%) became agitated upon awakening but recovered rapidly without medication. Three patients (4.9%) had recall and physician satisfaction rate was 93.4%.: A feasibility trial of an implemented protocol for ketofol procedural sedation in adults showed only minor respiratory events, a low incidence of agitation or hallucinations, minimal recall and a high success and physician satisfaction rate. Despite a non-consecutive and limited sample used, ketofol in a 1 to 4 ratio appears safe and effective for use in the emergency department.
为了测试在我们急诊科使用氯胺酮和丙泊酚混合剂(“氯胺酮-丙泊酚合剂”)以1:4的比例进行成人程序性镇静的循证方案的可行性。我们假设该方案是安全有效的,并且能够促进程序性镇静。
在14个月期间,我们大学医院急诊科需要进行程序性镇静的成人被纳入一项前瞻性便利样本研究。患有重要合并症的患者与麻醉科讨论了在急诊科进行镇静的可行性。结果指标包括操作成功、呼吸和血流动力学事件、呕吐、躁动或幻觉、记忆以及医生满意度。
纳入了61例年龄在18至89岁之间的患者。除了一例操作外,其余所有操作均成功。6例患者(9.8%)出现了6次呼吸事件。这些事件包括通过气道重新定位缓解的气道阻塞,除了一次短暂的血氧饱和度下降外,对生命体征没有影响。未报告血流动力学事件和呕吐情况。5例患者(8.2%)出现愉快的幻觉,1例患者(1.6%)在苏醒时变得躁动,但未用药迅速恢复。3例患者(4.9%)有记忆,医生满意度为93.4%。
一项针对成人氯胺酮-丙泊酚合剂程序性镇静实施方案的可行性试验仅显示出轻微的呼吸事件、躁动或幻觉的低发生率、最小化的记忆以及高成功率和医生满意度。尽管使用的是非连续且有限的样本,但1:4比例的氯胺酮-丙泊酚合剂在急诊科使用似乎是安全有效的。