CAMHS Research Unit, Centre for Parent and Child Support, South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, Michael Rutter Centre, London, UK.
Department of Psychology, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.
Health Technol Assess. 2020 Mar;24(14):1-188. doi: 10.3310/hta24140.
The children of parents with severe personality difficulties have greater risk of significant mental health problems. Existing care is poorly co-ordinated, with limited effectiveness. A specialised parenting intervention may improve child and parenting outcomes, reduce family morbidity and lower the service costs.
To develop a specialised parenting intervention for parents affected by severe personality difficulties who have children with mental health problems and to conduct a feasibility trial.
A pragmatic, mixed-methods design to develop and pilot a specialised parenting intervention, Helping Families Programme-Modified, and to conduct a randomised feasibility trial with process evaluation. Initial cost-effectiveness was assessed using UK NHS/Personal Social Services and societal perspectives, generating quality-adjusted life-years. Researchers collecting quantitative data were masked to participant allocation.
Two NHS mental health trusts and concomitant children's social care services.
Parents who met the following criteria: (1) the primary caregiver of the index child, (2) aged 18-65 years, (3) have severe personality difficulties, (4) proficient in English and (5) capable of providing informed consent. Index children who met the following criteria: (1) aged 3-11 years, (2) living with index parent and (3) have significant emotional/behavioural difficulties. Exclusion criteria were (1) having coexisting psychosis, (2) participating in another parenting intervention, (3) receiving inpatient care, (4) having insufficient language/cognitive abilities, (5) having child developmental disorder, (6) care proceedings and (7) index child not residing with index parent.
The Helping Families Programme-Modified - a 16-session intervention using structured, goal-orientated strategies and collaborative therapeutic methods to improve parenting, and child and parent functioning. Usual care - standard care augmented by a single psychoeducational session.
Trial feasibility - rates of recruitment, eligibility, allocation, retention, data completion and experience. Intervention acceptability - rates of acceptance, completion, alliance (Working Alliance Inventory-Short Revised) and experience. Outcomes - child (assessed via Concerns About My Child, Eyberg Child Behaviour Inventory, Child Behaviour Checklist-Internalising Scale), parenting (assessed via the Arnold-O'Leary Parenting Scale, Kansas Parental Satisfaction Scale), parent (assessed via the Symptom Checklist-27), and health economics (assessed via the Client Service Receipt Inventory, EuroQol-5 Dimensions).
The findings broadly supported trial feasibility using non-diagnostic screening criteria. Parents were mainly referred from one site (75.0%). Site and participant factors delayed recruitment. An estimate of eligible parents was not obtained. Of the 86 parents referred, 60 (69.7%) completed screening and 48 of these (80.0%) were recruited. Participants experienced significant disadvantage and multiple morbidity. The Helping Families Programme-Modified uptake (87.5%) was higher than usual-care uptake (62.5%). Trial retention (66.7%, 95% confidence interval 51.6% to 79.6%) exceeded the a priori rate. Process findings highlighted the impact of random allocation and the negative effects on retention. The Helping Families Programme-Modified was acceptable, with duration of delivery longer than planned, whereas the usual-care condition was less acceptable. At initial follow-up, effects on child and parenting outcomes were detected across both arms, with a potential outcome advantage for the Helping Families Programme-Modified (effect size range 0.0-1.3). For parental quality-adjusted life-years, the Helping Families Programme-Modified dominated usual care, and child quality-adjusted life-years resulted in higher costs and more quality-adjusted life-years. At second follow-up, the Helping Families Programme-Modified was associated with higher costs and more quality-adjusted life-years than usual care. For child quality-adjusted life-years, when controlled for baseline EuroQol-5 Dimensions, three-level version, usual care dominated the Helping Families Programme-Modified. No serious adverse events were reported.
The Helping Families Programme-Modified is an acceptable specialised parenting intervention. Trial methods using non-diagnostic criteria were largely supported. For future work, a definitive efficacy trial should consider site selection, recruitment methods, intervention efficiency and revised comparator condition.
Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN14573230.
This project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme and will be published in full in ; Vol. 24, No. 14. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.
父母有严重人格障碍的孩子患严重精神健康问题的风险更大。现有的护理协调不力,效果有限。专门的养育干预措施可以改善儿童和养育结果,降低家庭发病率,并降低服务成本。
为受严重人格障碍影响且子女有精神健康问题的父母开发专门的养育干预措施,并进行可行性试验。
一种实用的、混合方法的设计,用于开发和试点专门的养育干预措施——修改后的帮助家庭计划,并进行随机可行性试验和过程评估。使用英国国民保健制度/个人社会服务和社会观点进行初始成本效益评估,生成质量调整生命年。收集定量数据的研究人员对参与者分配情况不知情。
两个 NHS 心理健康信托和相应的儿童社会关怀服务。
符合以下标准的父母:(1) 主要照顾者索引儿童,(2) 年龄 18-65 岁,(3) 有严重人格障碍,(4) 精通英语,(5) 能够提供知情同意。符合以下标准的索引儿童:(1) 年龄 3-11 岁,(2) 与索引父母同住,(3) 有明显的情绪/行为问题。排除标准为(1) 同时患有精神分裂症,(2) 参加其他养育干预,(3) 住院治疗,(4) 语言/认知能力不足,(5) 有儿童发育障碍,(6) 护理程序,以及(7) 索引儿童未与索引父母同住。
修改后的帮助家庭计划——一种 16 节的干预措施,使用结构化、目标导向的策略和协作治疗方法来改善养育、儿童和父母的功能。常规护理——常规护理加上单次心理教育课程。
试验可行性——招募率、资格、分配、保留、数据完成和经验。干预措施的可接受性——接受率、完成率、联盟(工作联盟量表-短修订版)和经验。结果——儿童(通过关注我的孩子、眼伯格儿童行为量表、儿童行为检查表-内部化量表评估)、养育(通过阿诺德-奥利育儿量表、堪萨斯父母满意度量表评估)、父母(通过症状检查表-27 评估)和健康经济学(通过客户服务收据清单、欧洲五维健康量表评估)。
研究结果广泛支持使用非诊断性筛选标准的试验可行性。父母主要是从一个地点(75.0%)被转介的。地点和参与者因素延迟了招募。没有估计合格父母的人数。在 86 名被转介的父母中,有 60 名(69.7%)完成了筛选,其中 48 名(80.0%)被招募。参与者经历了显著的劣势和多种发病。帮助家庭计划的参与率(87.5%)高于常规护理的参与率(62.5%)。试验保留率(66.7%,95%置信区间为 51.6%至 79.6%)超过了预先设定的比率。过程研究结果强调了随机分配的影响以及对保留的负面影响。帮助家庭计划是可以接受的,其交付时间比计划的要长,而常规护理条件的接受程度较低。在初步随访中,帮助家庭计划和常规护理都对儿童和养育结果产生了影响,帮助家庭计划具有潜在的优势(效应大小范围为 0.0-1.3)。对于父母的质量调整生命年,帮助家庭计划优于常规护理,而儿童的质量调整生命年则导致更高的成本和更多的质量调整生命年。在第二次随访中,帮助家庭计划与常规护理相比,成本更高,质量调整生命年更多。对于儿童的质量调整生命年,当控制基线欧洲五维健康量表的三个水平版本时,常规护理优于帮助家庭计划。没有报告严重的不良事件。
修改后的帮助家庭计划是一种可以接受的专门养育干预措施。使用非诊断标准的试验方法得到了广泛支持。对于未来的工作,一项确定性疗效试验应考虑选择地点、招募方法、干预效率和修订的对照条件。
当前对照试验 ISRCTN85601545。
本项目由英国国家卫生研究院(NIHR)健康技术评估计划资助,全文将在;第 24 卷,第 14 期。有关该项目的更多信息,请访问 NIHR 期刊库网站。