• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估 Scheimpflug 成像系统作为提高角膜散光人工晶状体植入术参考标记准确性的附加工具(与裂隙灯标记系统相比)。

Evaluation of Scheimpflug imaging system as an added tool in improving the accuracy of reference marking (as compared to the slit lamp marking system) for toric intraocular lens implantation.

机构信息

Amber Eye Care and Micro Surgery Centre, Thane, Maharashtra, India.

出版信息

Indian J Ophthalmol. 2020 Apr;68(4):583-586. doi: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_1253_19.

DOI:10.4103/ijo.IJO_1253_19
PMID:32174573
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7210844/
Abstract

PURPOSE

To assess the role of Scheimpflug imaging in improving the accuracy of reference marking for toric IOL implantation.

METHODS

In this prospective, randomized, clinical trial all patients with cataract and pre-existing significant regular corneal astigmatism, who required implantation of a toric IOL were included in the study, and patients with any ocular pathology or abnormality were excluded. Patients were divided into two groups: For one group of patients, Group I (GI), reference marking was finalized using slit lamp only, and for the second group, Group II (GII), after slit lamp marking, the reference marks were checked using Goniometer of Scheimpflug imaging. The primary outcome was to determine the axis of toric intraocular lens (IOL) postoperatively (within 1 hour) and compare it with the desired axis of placement.

RESULTS

We found a statistically significant difference in the two groups (P < 0.001) suggesting Group II (4 step technique) is better than Group I (3 step technique).

CONCLUSION

Scheimpflug imaging, an extra step preoperatively, is an effective measure to reduce errors in reference marking and thereby improving the refractive outcome of toric intraocular lens.

摘要

目的

评估 Scheimpflug 成像在提高散光人工晶状体植入参考标记准确性方面的作用。

方法

在这项前瞻性、随机、临床试验中,所有需要植入散光人工晶状体的白内障伴预先存在的明显规则性角膜散光的患者均被纳入研究,排除任何眼部疾病或异常的患者。患者分为两组:第一组患者(GI)仅使用裂隙灯完成参考标记,第二组(GII)在裂隙灯标记后使用 Scheimpflug 成像的眼压计检查参考标记。主要结局是确定术后(1 小时内)的散光人工晶状体(IOL)轴向,并与预期的放置轴进行比较。

结果

我们发现两组之间存在统计学差异(P<0.001),表明第二组(4 步技术)优于第一组(3 步技术)。

结论

Scheimpflug 成像,术前的额外步骤,是一种减少参考标记误差的有效措施,从而提高散光人工晶状体的屈光效果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/41f4/7210844/f700e8ac3a1f/IJO-68-583-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/41f4/7210844/4aec3f6834d2/IJO-68-583-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/41f4/7210844/42e881336c7c/IJO-68-583-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/41f4/7210844/edfeded08e68/IJO-68-583-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/41f4/7210844/1ac052b18d2e/IJO-68-583-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/41f4/7210844/f700e8ac3a1f/IJO-68-583-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/41f4/7210844/4aec3f6834d2/IJO-68-583-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/41f4/7210844/42e881336c7c/IJO-68-583-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/41f4/7210844/edfeded08e68/IJO-68-583-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/41f4/7210844/1ac052b18d2e/IJO-68-583-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/41f4/7210844/f700e8ac3a1f/IJO-68-583-g006.jpg

相似文献

1
Evaluation of Scheimpflug imaging system as an added tool in improving the accuracy of reference marking (as compared to the slit lamp marking system) for toric intraocular lens implantation.评估 Scheimpflug 成像系统作为提高角膜散光人工晶状体植入术参考标记准确性的附加工具(与裂隙灯标记系统相比)。
Indian J Ophthalmol. 2020 Apr;68(4):583-586. doi: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_1253_19.
2
An easy and practical method for toric intraocular lens implantation: marking corneal astigmatic axis at slit-lamp.一种简单实用的散光人工晶状体植入方法:在裂隙灯下标记角膜散光轴。
Int Ophthalmol. 2017 Feb;37(1):179-184. doi: 10.1007/s10792-016-0250-3. Epub 2016 May 12.
3
Rotational slit-beam marking: an advanced manual corneal astigmatic marking method for toric intraocular lens implantation.旋转裂隙光束标记:一种用于有晶状体眼人工晶状体植入的先进手动角膜散光标记方法。
Int Ophthalmol. 2020 Nov;40(11):3115-3125. doi: 10.1007/s10792-020-01498-y. Epub 2020 Jul 4.
4
Digital versus slit-beam marking for toric intraocular lenses in cataract surgery.数字化与裂隙光束标记在白内障手术中的散光人工晶状体
BMC Ophthalmol. 2022 Jul 27;22(1):323. doi: 10.1186/s12886-022-02548-y.
5
Verion digital marking versus smartphone-assisted manual marking and isolated manual marking in toric intraocular lens implantation.威视数字化标记与智能手机辅助手动标记及单纯手动标记在散光型人工晶状体植入术中的比较。
Indian J Ophthalmol. 2020 Mar;68(3):455-458. doi: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_987_19.
6
[Visual quality comparison after multifocal toric intraocular lens or monofocal toric intraocular lens implantation].[多焦点散光人工晶状体或单焦点散光人工晶状体植入术后的视觉质量比较]
Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi. 2017 Apr 11;53(4):274-280. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0412-4081.2017.04.009.
7
Iris Registration Capsulotomy Marking Versus Manual Marking for Toric Intraocular Lens Alignment in Cataract Surgery.白内障手术中用于散光人工晶状体定位的虹膜注册囊切开标记与手动标记对比
Am J Ophthalmol. 2021 Jan;221:97-104. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2020.08.041. Epub 2020 Sep 2.
8
Image-Guided Marking versus Manual Marking in Phacoemulsification with Toric Intraocular Lens (IOL) Implantation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials.基于影像引导的标记与手动标记在散光型人工晶状体(IOL)植入白内障超声乳化术中的应用:一项随机临床试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Semin Ophthalmol. 2024 Jan;39(1):60-65. doi: 10.1080/08820538.2023.2231575. Epub 2023 Jul 3.
9
Toric intraocular lens implantation versus astigmatic keratotomy to correct astigmatism during phacoemulsification.白内障超声乳化术中植入散光人工晶状体与角膜散光切开术矫正散光的比较。
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2014 May;40(5):741-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2013.10.036. Epub 2014 Mar 27.
10
Accuracy of toric intraocular lens implantation in cataract and refractive surgery.散光型人工晶状体在白内障和屈光手术中的准确性。
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2011 Aug;37(8):1394-402. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2011.02.024.

引用本文的文献

1
Commentary: Toric intraocular lens alignment: Going markerless.评论:散光人工晶状体的对准:迈向无标记时代。
Indian J Ophthalmol. 2020 Apr;68(4):587-588. doi: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_1877_19.

本文引用的文献

1
Image-guided system versus manual marking for toric intraocular lens alignment in cataract surgery.影像引导系统与手动标记在白内障手术中用于散光人工晶状体定位的比较。
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2017 Jun;43(6):781-788. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2017.03.041.
2
New regression formula for toric intraocular lens calculations.用于散光人工晶状体计算的新回归公式。
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2016 May;42(5):663-71. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2016.02.038.
3
Intraocular lens alignment methods.人工晶状体对准方法。
Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2016 Jan;27(1):65-75. doi: 10.1097/ICU.0000000000000225.
4
Comparison of 3 marking techniques in preoperative assessment of toric intraocular lenses using a wavefront aberrometer.使用波前像差仪对散光人工晶状体术前评估中三种标记技术的比较
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2015 Jun;41(6):1232-40. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2014.09.045. Epub 2015 Jun 17.
5
First clinicial results on the feasibility, quality and reproducibility of aberrometry-based intraoperative refraction during cataract surgery.基于像差的白内障手术中折射术中可行性、质量和可重复性的初步临床结果。
Br J Ophthalmol. 2014 Nov;98(11):1484-91. doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2013-304786. Epub 2014 May 30.
6
Clinical evaluation of accuracy of horizontal meridian limbal marking.水平子午线角膜缘标记准确性的临床评估
Optom Vis Sci. 2013 Jun;90(6):540-5. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0b013e3182936590.
7
Evaluation of 4 corneal astigmatic marking methods.评估 4 种角膜散光标记方法。
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2012 Dec;38(12):2094-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2012.07.039. Epub 2012 Oct 23.
8
New axis-marking method for a toric intraocular lens: mapping method.一种用于设计环曲面人工晶状体的新的轴向标记方法:映射法。
J Refract Surg. 2011 May;27(5):375-9. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20101005-01. Epub 2010 Oct 15.
9
Effect of intraoperative aberrometry on the rate of postoperative enhancement: retrospective study.术中像差测量对术后增强发生率的影响:回顾性研究。
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2010 May;36(5):747-55. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2009.11.029.
10
Assessment of toric intraocular lens alignment by a refractive power/corneal analyzer system and slitlamp observation.基于屈光力/角膜分析仪系统和裂隙灯观察评估散光型人工晶状体的位置。
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2010 Feb;36(2):222-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2009.08.033.