Noppe L D, Gallagher J M
J Pers Assess. 1977 Feb;41(1):85-90. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa4101_14.
Creative thinking was explored from several approaches to further understanding of the interrelationship of perception, personality, and cognition. College students (N = 45) were administered the Group Embedded Figures Test (GEFT), the Remote Associates Test (RAT), a questionnaire concerning RAT strategy, and two self-report scales. Field independent subjects were found to be significantly (p less than .001) more creative than field dependents. Correlations between the RAT and GEFT and the self-report measures of conformity and creativity, while largely nonsignificant, were in the predicted directions. Results demonstrated that advanced strategy levels and insightful responses were significantly related to high performance on the RAT. Theoretical links between cognitive style and Piagetian concepts were discussed in regard to creative thought. Overall, these findings support the contention that the creative processes should be studied, not as isolated structures, but with relational and multifaceted emphasis.
从多种途径对创造性思维进行了探索,以进一步理解感知、个性和认知之间的相互关系。对45名大学生进行了团体镶嵌图形测验(GEFT)、远距离联想测验(RAT)、一份关于RAT策略的问卷以及两份自我报告量表。结果发现,场独立型受试者比场依存型受试者更具创造性,差异极为显著(p小于0.001)。RAT与GEFT之间的相关性以及从众性和创造性的自我报告测量结果,虽然大多不显著,但方向符合预期。结果表明,高级策略水平和有洞察力的反应与RAT的高表现显著相关。就创造性思维而言,讨论了认知风格与皮亚杰概念之间的理论联系。总体而言,这些发现支持了这样一种观点,即创造性过程不应作为孤立的结构来研究,而应侧重于关系和多方面的研究。