Black Joshua, Belicki Kathryn, Emberley-Ralph Jessica, McCann Aubrey
Department of Psychology, Brock University, St. Catharines, Ontario, Canada.
Death Stud. 2022;46(2):399-414. doi: 10.1080/07481187.2020.1737274. Epub 2020 Mar 16.
This research investigated the predictors of internalized versus externalized continuing bonds to examine whether internalized bonds are more associated with adaptive adjustment to bereavement than externalized. Four studies were conducted: two of romantic partner loss ( = 268 & 218), one of dog or cat loss ( = 199), and one of prenatal loss ( = 226). Participants completed questionnaires online. As predicted, the use of internalized continuing bonds was related to indicators of positive adaptation to grief (e.g. more secure attachment to deceased) while externalized was more strongly associated with indicators of clinical distress (e.g. greater trauma symptomatology).
本研究调查了内化与外化持续联结的预测因素,以检验内化联结是否比外化联结更能与丧亲后的适应性调整相关联。研究开展了四项:两项关于恋人离世(样本量分别为268和218),一项关于宠物猫狗离世(样本量为199),一项关于流产(样本量为226)。参与者通过在线方式完成问卷。正如预测的那样,内化持续联结的使用与悲伤积极适应指标相关(例如对逝者的依恋更安全),而外化持续联结则与临床痛苦指标关联更强(例如创伤症状更严重)。