Im Sung Il, Lee Sung Ho, Gwag Hye Bin, Park Youngjun, Park Seung-Jung, Kim June Soo, On Young Keun, Park Kyoung-Min
Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kosin University Gospel Hospital, Kosin University College of Medicine, Busan.
Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kangbuk Samsung Hospital.
Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Mar;99(11):e19398. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000019398.
Electrocardiographic (ECG) criteria identifying right- and left-sided outflow tract origins have been established. The purpose of this study was to define the criteria for premature ventricular contractions (PVCs) originating from the right coronary cusp (RCC) adequately.We analyzed ECG and electrophysiologic study data from patients who underwent successful ablation of PVCs originating from the RCC and right ventricular outflow tract (RVOT). Eighteen RCC and 28 septal RVOT PVCs were studied. Among these 18 successful RCC PVCs, a predominantly positive QRS in lead I in 18/18 (100%), longer V1-2 R-wave duration (81.4 ± 31.1 vs 44.8 ± 7.0 ms, P = .02), V1-2 R wave duration index (RWDI) (51.3 ± 22.0 vs 31.2 ± 7.5%, P = .06) were observed compared to those with posteroseptal RVOT. Local ventricular activation time preceding QRS onset was significantly earlier (-38 ± 12 ms) at the successful RCC ablation site compared to the failed ablation site of the septal RVOT (-22 ± 8 ms), even without good pace mapping at the RVOT (P < .001). The receiver operating characteristic curve showed that a pre-QRS time of ≥-31 ms predicted successful RCC ablation with 67% sensitivity and 94% specificity. A predominantly positive QRS in lead I, longer R-wave duration and RWDI in lead V1 or V2 with a local ventricular activation preceding QRS onset by an average of -31 ms suggests an effective RCC ablation site.
已确立识别右、左心室流出道起源的心电图(ECG)标准。本研究的目的是充分界定源自右冠状动脉瓣(RCC)的室性早搏(PVC)标准。我们分析了接受成功消融源自RCC和右心室流出道(RVOT)的PVC患者的ECG和电生理研究数据。研究了18例RCC和28例间隔RVOT的PVC。在这18例成功消融的RCC PVC中,与后间隔RVOT相比,I导联中QRS波主要为正向的比例为18/18(100%),V1 - 2导联R波持续时间更长(81.4±31.1 vs 44.8±7.0 ms,P = 0.02),V1 - 2导联R波持续时间指数(RWDI)(51.3±22.0 vs 31.2±7.5%,P = 0.06)。与间隔RVOT消融失败部位相比,成功的RCC消融部位在QRS波起始前的局部心室激动时间显著更早(-38±12 ms),而间隔RVOT消融失败部位为(-22±8 ms),即使在RVOT未进行良好的起搏标测时也是如此(P < 0.001)。受试者工作特征曲线显示,QRS波前时间≥ - 31 ms预测成功RCC消融的敏感性为67%,特异性为94%。I导联中QRS波主要为正向、V1或V2导联R波持续时间和RWDI更长,且QRS波起始前局部心室激动平均提前 - 31 ms提示为有效的RCC消融部位。