School of Psychology, Bangor University, Bangor, UK.
Subst Use Misuse. 2020;55(7):1184-1188. doi: 10.1080/10826084.2020.1731544. Epub 2020 Mar 16.
: There have been two methods of gaining retrospective self-report estimates of alcohol consumption, quantity frequency (QF) and retrospective diary (RD), offering distinct advantages and disadvantages. The typical and atypical drinking diary (TADD) was developed to benefit from each method's advantages. : To compare estimates obtained from the TADD with corresponding estimates obtained from a QF measure (Khavari alcohol test; KAT) and an RD measure, the timeline follow-back (TLFB). It was hypothesized that the TADD's alcohol consumption estimates would correlate strongly with those obtained from the TLFB; and the strength of the TADD-TLFB correlation would be significantly stronger than the KAT-TLFB correlation. : One hundred and sixty-eight (168) undergraduates (73% female) estimated their alcohol consumption for the preceding 12 weeks using all three measures. : The TADD ( = 0.83, < .001) and the KAT ( = 0.066, < .001) produced estimates of total alcohol consumption that correlated very strongly and strongly, respectively, with the TLFB. Notably, the TADD-TLFB correlation was significantly stronger than the KAT-TLFB correlation ( = 5.10, < .001). Moreover, the TADD's estimates of number of drinking days ( = 0.70, < .001) and heavy drinking episodes per week (0.77, < .001) correlated strongly with corresponding estimates from the TLFB. The TADD and KAT provided higher estimates of alcohol consumption than the TLFB. : Clinicians and researchers should consider using the TADD to estimate alcohol consumption in time-limited situations.
有两种方法可以获得回顾性自我报告的酒精消费估计,即数量频率(QF)和回顾性日记(RD),它们各有优缺点。典型和非典型饮酒日记(TADD)的开发是为了从每种方法的优势中受益。
本研究旨在比较 TADD 与相应的 QF 测量(Khavari 酒精测试;KAT)和 RD 测量(时间线回溯;TLFB)获得的估计值。假设 TADD 的酒精消费估计值与 TLFB 获得的估计值密切相关;并且 TADD-TLFB 相关性的强度明显强于 KAT-TLFB 相关性。
168 名(73%为女性)本科生使用所有三种方法估计了他们在前 12 周的酒精摄入量。
TADD( = 0.83, < .001)和 KAT( = 0.066, < .001)产生的总酒精消耗量估计值与 TLFB 非常密切相关,分别为强相关。值得注意的是,TADD-TLFB 相关性明显强于 KAT-TLFB 相关性( = 5.10, < .001)。此外,TADD 对饮酒天数( = 0.70, < .001)和每周重度饮酒事件(0.77, < .001)的估计值与 TLFB 对应的估计值密切相关。TADD 和 KAT 提供的酒精摄入量估计值高于 TLFB。
临床医生和研究人员在限时情况下应考虑使用 TADD 来估计酒精摄入量。