Suppr超能文献

海姆泊芬在治疗上消化道出血的疗效:系统评价和荟萃分析。

Efficacy of Hemospray in Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

机构信息

John H Stroger Hospital of Cook County, Chicago, Illinois, USA.

Robert Wood Johnson University Hospital, New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA.

出版信息

J Gastrointestin Liver Dis. 2020 Mar 13;29(1):69-76. doi: 10.15403/jgld-660.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Hemospray is a non-contact modality of endoscopic hemostasis that has been used in the management of upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB) with varying success. Our aim was to evaluate the efficacy of Hemospray in the management of UGIB.

METHODS

An electronic bibliographic search of digital dissertation databases was performed from inception till October 2019. All prospective studies, including randomized controlled trials evaluating the efficacy of Hemospray in the management of UGIB were analysed. The primary outcome was immediate haemostasis and the secondary outcome was rebleeding rate. Subgroup analyses based on etiology of UGIB (tumour-related, variceal, etc) were also performed.

RESULTS

A total of 11 prospective studies, including 4 randomized trials were included for the analysis. The pooled immediate haemostasis rate with Hemospray was 93% (95% CI 90.3-95%, p<0.001). Rebleeding occurred in 14.4% (95% CI 8.8-22.8%, p<0.001) of patients. For the subgroup of tumour-related bleeding, the immediate haemostasis rate was 95.3% (95% CI 89.6-97.3%; p <0.001) and rebleeding rate was 21.9% (95% CI 13.9-32.7%, p <0.001). In patients with variceal bleeding, immediate haemostasis was achieved in 92.7% (95% CI 83.6-96.9%; p<0.001) of patients, with a rebleeding rate of 3.1% (95% CI 0.9-10.2%, p <0.001).

CONCLUSION

Hemospray shows high immediate haemostasis and low bleeding percentages. The odds were in its favour compared to conventional endoscopic modalities, but not statistically significant. The results are undermined by the risk of bias in the studies. Nevertheless, it is an easy technique that should be further investigated with better studies.

摘要

背景与目的

Hemospray 是一种非接触式的内镜止血方法,已成功应用于上消化道出血(UGIB)的治疗。本研究旨在评估 Hemospray 在 UGIB 治疗中的疗效。

方法

从建库至 2019 年 10 月,对电子文献数据库进行了电子文献检索。所有前瞻性研究,包括评估 Hemospray 在 UGIB 治疗中疗效的随机对照试验,均进行了分析。主要结局为即刻止血,次要结局为再出血率。还根据 UGIB 的病因(肿瘤相关、静脉曲张等)进行了亚组分析。

结果

共纳入 11 项前瞻性研究,包括 4 项随机试验进行分析。Hemospray 的即刻止血率为 93%(95%CI 90.3-95%,p<0.001)。再出血率为 14.4%(95%CI 8.8-22.8%,p<0.001)。对于肿瘤相关出血亚组,即刻止血率为 95.3%(95%CI 89.6-97.3%;p<0.001),再出血率为 21.9%(95%CI 13.9-32.7%,p<0.001)。对于静脉曲张出血患者,即刻止血率为 92.7%(95%CI 83.6-96.9%;p<0.001),再出血率为 3.1%(95%CI 0.9-10.2%,p<0.001)。

结论

Hemospray 即刻止血效果高,出血率低。与传统内镜治疗方法相比,其优势明显,但无统计学意义。研究存在偏倚风险,结果受到影响。然而,这是一种简单的技术,应该通过更好的研究进一步进行研究。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验