Marine Biotechnology Laboratory, Institute of Bioscience, Universiti Putra Malaysia, 43400 Serdang, Selangor, Malaysia.
Marine Biotechnology Laboratory, Institute of Bioscience, Universiti Putra Malaysia, 43400 Serdang, Selangor, Malaysia; School of Pharmacy, Monash University Malaysia, Jalan Lagoon Selatan, 47500 Bandar Sunway, Selangor, Malaysia.
J Microbiol Methods. 2020 May;172:105890. doi: 10.1016/j.mimet.2020.105890. Epub 2020 Mar 13.
Any forms of valorization of microorganisms would require accurate identity recognition to ensure repeatability, reproducibility and quality assurance. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of different primers for identifying cultured eukaryotic microalgae using a simple 18S rDNA approach. A total of 34 isolated microalgae and one culture collection were utilized in the search for an effective molecular identification method for microalgae. Ammonium formate was applied to marine microalgae prior to DNA extraction. The microalgal DNA was extracted using a commercial kit and subjected directly to PCR amplification using four different published 18S rDNA primers. The DNA sequences were analysed using Basic Local Alignment Search Tool (BLAST) and phylogenetic trees to determine the microalgae identity. The identity was further validated with conventional morphological taxonomic identification, and the relationship of microalgal morphology and genetic materials was also determined. The microalgal DNA was successfully amplified, including marine species without prior cleaning. In addition, the ss5 + ss3 primer pair was found to be an ideal primer set among the tested primers for identifying microalgae. Overall, molecular identification showed relative matching with morphological identification (82.86%). This study is important because it serves as a platform to develop a standardized eukaryotic microalgae identification method. In addition, this method could help to ease the eukaryotic microalgae identification process and enrich the current reference databases such as GenBank.
任何形式的微生物增值都需要进行准确的身份识别,以确保可重复性、再现性和质量保证。本研究旨在评估不同引物在使用简单的 18S rDNA 方法识别培养的真核微藻方面的有效性。本研究共使用了 34 株分离的微藻和一个培养物库,以寻找一种有效的微藻分子鉴定方法。在提取 DNA 之前,采用甲酸铵处理海洋微藻。使用商业试剂盒提取微藻 DNA,然后直接使用四个不同的已发表的 18S rDNA 引物进行 PCR 扩增。使用 Basic Local Alignment Search Tool (BLAST) 和系统发育树对 DNA 序列进行分析,以确定微藻的身份。进一步通过传统的形态分类学鉴定来验证身份,并确定微藻形态和遗传物质之间的关系。成功扩增了微藻 DNA,包括未经预先清洁的海洋物种。此外,在测试的引物中,ss5+ss3 引物对被发现是识别微藻的理想引物组合。总的来说,分子鉴定与形态鉴定具有相对匹配性(82.86%)。本研究很重要,因为它为开发标准化的真核微藻鉴定方法提供了一个平台。此外,该方法有助于简化真核微藻的鉴定过程,并丰富当前的参考数据库,如 GenBank。