Suppr超能文献

新辅助化疗后局部区域复发风险:九个前瞻性新辅助乳腺癌试验的汇总分析。

Locoregional recurrence risk after neoadjuvant chemotherapy: A pooled analysis of nine prospective neoadjuvant breast cancer trials.

机构信息

German Breast Group Neu-Isenburg, Germany; Latin American Cooperative Oncology Group (LACOG) Porto Alegre, Brazil.

Helios-Klinikum Berlin-Buch, Germany.

出版信息

Eur J Cancer. 2020 May;130:92-101. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2020.02.015. Epub 2020 Mar 13.

Abstract

AIM

This pooled analysis aimed to evaluate locoregional recurrence (LRR) rates of breast cancer (BC) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) and to identify independent LRR predictors.

METHODS

10,075 women with primary BC from nine neoadjuvant trials were included. The primary outcome was the cumulative incidence rate of LRR as the first event after NACT. Distant recurrence, secondary malignancy or death were defined as competing events. For identifying LRR predictors, surgery type, pathological complete response (pCR), BC subtypes and other potential risk factors were evaluated.

RESULTS

Median followup was 67 months (range 0-215), overall LRR rate was 9.5%, 4.1% in pCR versus 9.5% in non-pCR patients. Younger age, clinically positive lymph nodes, G3 tumours, non-pCR and TNBC but not surgery type were independent LRR predictors in multivariate analysis. Among BC subtypes, 5-year cumulative LRR rates were associated with higher risk in non-pCR versus pCR patients, which was significant for HR+/HER2- (5.9% vs 3.9%; HR = 2.32 [95%CI 1.22-4.43]; p = 0.011); HR-/HER2+ (14.8% vs 3.1%; HR = 4.26 [94%CI 2.35-7.71]; p < 0.001) and TNBC (18.5% vs 4.2%; HR = 4.10 [95%CI 2.88-5.82]; p < 0.001) but not for HR+/HER2+ (8.1% vs 4.8%; HR = 1.56 [95%CI 0.85-2.85]; p = 0.150). Within non-pCR subgroup, LRR risk was higher for HR-/HER2+ and TNBC vs HR+/HER2- (HR = 2.05 [95%CI 1.54-2.73]; p < 0.001 and HR = 2.77 [95%CI 2.27-3.39]; p < 0.001, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

This pooled analysis demonstrated that young age, node-positive and G3 tumours, as well as TNBC, and non-pCR significantly increased the risk of LRR after NACT. Hence, there is a clear need to investigate better multimodality therapies in the post-neoadjuvant setting for high-risk patients.

摘要

目的

本荟萃分析旨在评估新辅助化疗(NACT)后乳腺癌(BC)的局部区域复发(LRR)率,并确定独立的 LRR 预测因素。

方法

纳入了来自 9 项新辅助试验的 10075 例原发性 BC 女性患者。主要结局为 NACT 后首次发生 LRR 的累积发生率。远处复发、继发性恶性肿瘤或死亡定义为竞争事件。为了确定 LRR 的预测因素,评估了手术类型、病理完全缓解(pCR)、BC 亚型和其他潜在的风险因素。

结果

中位随访时间为 67 个月(0-215 个月),总 LRR 率为 9.5%,pCR 组为 4.1%,非 pCR 组为 9.5%。多变量分析显示,年龄较小、临床阳性淋巴结、G3 肿瘤、非 pCR 和三阴性乳腺癌(TNBC)而非手术类型是 LRR 的独立预测因素。在 BC 亚型中,非 pCR 组与 pCR 组相比,5 年累积 LRR 率与更高的风险相关,在 HR+/HER2-(5.9%比 3.9%;HR=2.32[95%CI 1.22-4.43];p=0.011)和 HR-/HER2+(14.8%比 3.1%;HR=4.26[94%CI 2.35-7.71];p<0.001)和 TNBC(18.5%比 4.2%;HR=4.10[95%CI 2.88-5.82];p<0.001)中更为显著,但在 HR+/HER2+(8.1%比 4.8%;HR=1.56[95%CI 0.85-2.85];p=0.150)中不显著。在非 pCR 亚组中,HR-/HER2+和 TNBC 组的 LRR 风险高于 HR+/HER2-组(HR=2.05[95%CI 1.54-2.73];p<0.001 和 HR=2.77[95%CI 2.27-3.39];p<0.001)。

结论

本荟萃分析表明,年轻、淋巴结阳性和 G3 肿瘤以及 TNBC 和非 pCR 显著增加了 NACT 后 LRR 的风险。因此,显然需要在新辅助治疗后对高危患者进行更好的多模式治疗研究。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验