• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

新辅助治疗后cT3-4期乳腺癌患者的降阶梯手术:保乳的预测因素及与乳房切除术的长期肿瘤学结局比较

De-Escalation Surgery in cT3-4 Breast Cancer Patients after Neoadjuvant Therapy: Predictors of Breast Conservation and Comparison of Long-Term Oncological Outcomes with Mastectomy.

作者信息

Tinterri Corrado, Barbieri Erika, Sagona Andrea, Bottini Alberto, Canavese Giuseppe, Gentile Damiano

机构信息

Breast Unit, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Via Manzoni 56, 20089 Milan, Italy.

Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Via Rita Levi Montalcini 4, 20090 Milan, Italy.

出版信息

Cancers (Basel). 2024 Mar 16;16(6):1169. doi: 10.3390/cancers16061169.

DOI:10.3390/cancers16061169
PMID:38539504
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10969431/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) has become increasingly employed for the treatment of cT3-4 breast cancer (BC), enabling breast-conserving surgery (BCS) in cases traditionally considered for mastectomy. This study aims to identify predictors for breast conservation post-NAT and to evaluate whether BCS influences long-term oncological outcomes.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed data from patients with cT3-4 BC who received NAT at the Breast Unit of IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Milan, Italy, from October 2009 to April 2020. Surgical outcomes and long-term oncological results, such as disease-free survival (DFS), distant DFS (DDFS), overall survival (OS), and BC-specific survival (BCSS), were compared between the BCS and mastectomy groups.

RESULTS

Among 114 patients analyzed, 37 (32.5%) underwent BCS, and 77 (67.5%) had a mastectomy. The key predictors for opting for BCS included absence of vascular invasion, reduced tumor size post-NAT, and achieving ypT0 status. No significant differences in DFS, DDFS, OS, and BCSS were observed between the two surgical groups (log-ranks, = 0.520, = 0.789, = 0.216, = 0.559, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

BCS after NAT is a feasible and safe option for patients with cT3-4 BC, without adversely affecting long-term oncological outcomes. Identifying predictors of breast conservation can guide surgical decision-making, ensuring that patients receive optimal treatment.

摘要

背景

新辅助治疗(NAT)已越来越多地用于治疗cT3-4期乳腺癌(BC),使得在传统上考虑行乳房切除术的病例中能够进行保乳手术(BCS)。本研究旨在确定NAT后保乳的预测因素,并评估BCS是否会影响长期肿瘤学结局。

方法

我们回顾性分析了2009年10月至2020年4月在意大利米兰IRCCS胡马纳塔斯研究医院乳腺科接受NAT的cT3-4期BC患者的数据。比较了BCS组和乳房切除术组的手术结局以及长期肿瘤学结果,如无病生存(DFS)、远处无病生存(DDFS)、总生存(OS)和BC特异性生存(BCSS)。

结果

在分析的114例患者中,37例(32.5%)接受了BCS,77例(67.5%)进行了乳房切除术。选择BCS的关键预测因素包括无血管侵犯、NAT后肿瘤大小减小以及达到ypT0状态。两组手术患者的DFS、DDFS、OS和BCSS均未观察到显著差异(对数秩检验,P值分别为0.520、0.789、0.216、0.559)。

结论

对于cT3-4期BC患者,NAT后的BCS是一种可行且安全的选择,不会对长期肿瘤学结局产生不利影响。识别保乳的预测因素可以指导手术决策,确保患者接受最佳治疗。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0f98/10969431/aec848890fd1/cancers-16-01169-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0f98/10969431/7afd0d8b62de/cancers-16-01169-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0f98/10969431/aec848890fd1/cancers-16-01169-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0f98/10969431/7afd0d8b62de/cancers-16-01169-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0f98/10969431/aec848890fd1/cancers-16-01169-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
De-Escalation Surgery in cT3-4 Breast Cancer Patients after Neoadjuvant Therapy: Predictors of Breast Conservation and Comparison of Long-Term Oncological Outcomes with Mastectomy.新辅助治疗后cT3-4期乳腺癌患者的降阶梯手术:保乳的预测因素及与乳房切除术的长期肿瘤学结局比较
Cancers (Basel). 2024 Mar 16;16(6):1169. doi: 10.3390/cancers16061169.
2
Breast-conserving surgery versus mastectomy for treatment of breast cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy.新辅助化疗后乳腺癌治疗中保乳手术与乳房切除术的对比
Front Oncol. 2023 Jul 11;13:1178230. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1178230. eCollection 2023.
3
Breast conserving surgery versus salvage mastectomy for ipsilateral breast cancer recurrence: a propensity score matching analysis.保乳手术与挽救性乳房切除术治疗同侧乳腺癌复发的比较:倾向评分匹配分析。
Updates Surg. 2022 Apr;74(2):479-489. doi: 10.1007/s13304-021-01122-3. Epub 2021 Jun 28.
4
Predictors of mastectomy in breast cancer patients with complete remission of primary tumor after neoadjuvant therapy: A retrospective study.新辅助治疗后原发肿瘤完全缓解的乳腺癌患者行乳房切除术的预测因素:一项回顾性研究。
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2024 Dec;50(12):108732. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2024.108732. Epub 2024 Oct 2.
5
Locoregional recurrence and survival of breast-conserving surgery compared to mastectomy following neoadjuvant chemotherapy in operable breast cancer.可手术乳腺癌新辅助化疗后保乳手术与乳房切除术的局部区域复发及生存情况比较
Front Oncol. 2024 Mar 28;14:1308343. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1308343. eCollection 2024.
6
Oncological safety of breast-conserving surgery after primary systemic chemotherapy in cT3-4 breast cancer patients.cT3-4期乳腺癌患者接受新辅助化疗后保乳手术的肿瘤学安全性
Surg Today. 2015 Oct;45(10):1255-62. doi: 10.1007/s00595-014-1052-8. Epub 2014 Oct 19.
7
Is repeat breast conservation possible for small ipsilateral breast cancer recurrence?同侧乳房小范围癌症复发后能否再次进行保乳治疗?
Cancer. 2022 Nov 15;128(22):3919-3928. doi: 10.1002/cncr.34468. Epub 2022 Sep 20.
8
Salvage Mastectomy Is not the Treatment of Choice for Aggressive Subtypes of Ipsilateral Breast Cancer Recurrence: A Single-Institution Retrospective Study.挽救性乳房切除术并非同侧乳腺癌复发侵袭性亚型的首选治疗方法:一项单机构回顾性研究
Eur J Breast Health. 2022 Oct 1;18(4):315-322. doi: 10.4274/ejbh.galenos.2022.2022-5-3. eCollection 2022 Oct.
9
Long-term follow-up of complex oncoplastic breast-conserving surgery, standard breast conservation and skin-sparing mastectomy in DCIS - a register-based study.保乳术联合整形的长期随访:基于注册研究的 DCIS 患者行标准保乳术与保留皮肤的乳房切除术的对比
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2024 Feb;50(2):107938. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2023.107938. Epub 2023 Dec 28.
10
Survival After Breast-Conserving Surgery Compared with that After Mastectomy in Breast Cancer Patients Receiving Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy.接受新辅助化疗的乳腺癌患者保乳手术后与乳房切除术后的生存率比较。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2023 May;30(5):2845-2853. doi: 10.1245/s10434-022-12993-0. Epub 2022 Dec 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Survival benefit of surgery for inflammatory breast cancer patients.炎性乳腺癌患者手术的生存获益
Gland Surg. 2025 Jun 30;14(6):983-997. doi: 10.21037/gs-2024-561. Epub 2025 Jun 26.
2
Efficacy of Dual Hormonal Therapy with Fulvestrant and Aromatase Inhibitors as Neoadjuvant Endocrine Treatment for Locally Advanced Breast Cancer.氟维司群与芳香化酶抑制剂联合激素治疗作为局部晚期乳腺癌新辅助内分泌治疗的疗效
Cancers (Basel). 2025 Jun 21;17(13):2083. doi: 10.3390/cancers17132083.
3
Predictors of High-Burden Residual Axillary Disease After Neoadjuvant Therapy in Breast Cancer.

本文引用的文献

1
Changes in Surgical Management of the Axilla Over 11 Years - Report on More Than 1500 Breast Cancer Patients Treated with Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy on the Prospective I-SPY2 Trial.11 年间腋窝外科处理的变化——在 I-SPY2 前瞻性试验中接受新辅助化疗的 1500 多例乳腺癌患者的报告。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2023 Oct;30(11):6401-6410. doi: 10.1245/s10434-023-13759-y. Epub 2023 Jun 28.
2
Oncologic safety of breast conservation following NACT in women with locally advanced breast cancer.局部晚期乳腺癌女性新辅助化疗后保乳的肿瘤学安全性
Ecancermedicalscience. 2023 May 25;17:1554. doi: 10.3332/ecancer.2023.1554. eCollection 2023.
3
乳腺癌新辅助治疗后高负担腋窝残留病灶的预测因素
Cancers (Basel). 2025 May 8;17(10):1596. doi: 10.3390/cancers17101596.
4
Superior Survival and Lower Recurrence Outcomes with Breast-Conserving Surgery Compared to Mastectomy Following Neoadjuvant Therapy in 607 Breast Cancer Patients.在607例乳腺癌患者中,新辅助治疗后保乳手术与乳房切除术相比,具有更高的生存率和更低的复发率。
Cancers (Basel). 2025 Feb 24;17(5):766. doi: 10.3390/cancers17050766.
5
Research trends of neoadjuvant therapy for breast cancer: A bibliometric analysis.乳腺癌新辅助治疗的研究趋势:一项文献计量分析。
Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2025 Dec;21(1):2460272. doi: 10.1080/21645515.2025.2460272. Epub 2025 Feb 4.
6
Neoadjuvant Pembrolizumab Plus Chemotherapy in Early-Stage Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: A Nationwide Retrospective Turkish Oncology Group Study.新辅助派姆单抗联合化疗治疗早期三阴性乳腺癌:一项土耳其肿瘤学组全国性回顾性研究
Cancers (Basel). 2024 Oct 3;16(19):3389. doi: 10.3390/cancers16193389.
7
De-Escalation of Axillary Surgery in Clinically Node-Positive Breast Cancer Patients Treated with Neoadjuvant Therapy: Comparative Long-Term Outcomes of Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy versus Axillary Lymph Node Dissection.新辅助治疗的临床淋巴结阳性乳腺癌患者腋窝手术降阶梯治疗:前哨淋巴结活检与腋窝淋巴结清扫的长期疗效比较
Cancers (Basel). 2024 Sep 15;16(18):3168. doi: 10.3390/cancers16183168.
8
Non-Invasive 3D Breast Tumor Localization: A Viable Alternative to Invasive Tumor Marking.非侵入性3D乳腺肿瘤定位:侵入性肿瘤标记的可行替代方法。
Cancers (Basel). 2024 Jul 17;16(14):2564. doi: 10.3390/cancers16142564.
9
Breast Cancer Patient's Outcomes after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy and Surgery at 5 and 10 Years for Stage II-III Disease.II-III期疾病患者新辅助化疗及手术后5年和10年的乳腺癌患者预后
Cancers (Basel). 2024 Jun 30;16(13):2421. doi: 10.3390/cancers16132421.
10
The Role of MRI in Breast Cancer and Breast Conservation Therapy.磁共振成像在乳腺癌及保乳治疗中的作用
Cancers (Basel). 2024 Jun 1;16(11):2122. doi: 10.3390/cancers16112122.
Breast Conservation Surgery and Mastectomy Have Similar Locoregional Recurrence After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy: Results From 1462 Patients on the Prospective, Randomized I-SPY2 Trial.
保乳手术和乳房切除术在新辅助化疗后局部区域复发率相似:来自前瞻性、随机 I-SPY2 试验的 1462 例患者的结果。
Ann Surg. 2023 Sep 1;278(3):320-327. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000005968. Epub 2023 Jun 16.
4
Pathologic response and residual tumor cellularity after neo-adjuvant chemotherapy predict prognosis in breast cancer patients.新辅助化疗后病理反应和残留肿瘤细胞密度可预测乳腺癌患者的预后。
Breast. 2023 Jun;69:323-329. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2023.03.016. Epub 2023 Mar 28.
5
Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Breast Cancer Patients Undergoing Neo-Adjuvant Chemotherapy: Clinical Experience with Node-Negative and Node-Positive Disease Prior to Systemic Therapy.接受新辅助化疗的乳腺癌患者前哨淋巴结活检:全身治疗前淋巴结阴性和阳性疾病的临床经验
Cancers (Basel). 2023 Mar 11;15(6):1719. doi: 10.3390/cancers15061719.
6
The underused potential of breast conserving therapy after neoadjuvant system treatment - Causes and solutions.新辅助系统治疗后保乳治疗未充分利用的潜力-原因和解决方案。
Breast. 2023 Feb;67:110-115. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2023.01.008. Epub 2023 Jan 17.
7
Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy: Definitive Results with a Long-Term Follow-Up Evaluation.新辅助化疗后保留乳头的乳房切除术:长期随访评估的最终结果
Ann Surg Oncol. 2023 Apr;30(4):2163-2172. doi: 10.1245/s10434-022-13035-5. Epub 2023 Jan 4.
8
Survival After Breast-Conserving Surgery Compared with that After Mastectomy in Breast Cancer Patients Receiving Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy.接受新辅助化疗的乳腺癌患者保乳手术后与乳房切除术后的生存率比较。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2023 May;30(5):2845-2853. doi: 10.1245/s10434-022-12993-0. Epub 2022 Dec 28.
9
Does Breast-Conserving Surgery with Radiotherapy have a Better Survival than Mastectomy? A Meta-Analysis of More than 1,500,000 Patients.保乳手术联合放疗的生存率是否高于乳房切除术?一项对150多万患者的荟萃分析。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2022 Oct;29(10):6163-6188. doi: 10.1245/s10434-022-12133-8. Epub 2022 Jul 25.
10
Surgery after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy: A Clip-Based Technique to Improve Surgical Outcomes, a Single-Center Experience.新辅助化疗后的手术:一种基于夹子的技术以改善手术效果,单中心经验
Cancers (Basel). 2022 Apr 29;14(9):2229. doi: 10.3390/cancers14092229.