Deutsches Herzzentrum München, Klinik für Herz- und Kreislauferkrankungen, Abteilung Elektrophysiologie, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany.
Klinikum rechts der Isar, Institut für Medizinische Informatik, Statistik und Epidemiologie, Fakultät für Medizin, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany.
Sci Rep. 2020 Mar 16;10(1):4753. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-61625-8.
Therapy of choice for the primary and secondary prevention of sudden cardiac death is the implantation of an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD). Whereas appropriate and inappropriate ICD shocks lead to myocardial microdamage, this is not known for antitachycardia pacing (ATP). In total, 150 ICD recipients (66 ± 12 years, 81.3% male, 93.3% primary prevention, 30.0% resynchronization therapy) were randomly assigned to an ICD implantation with or without intraoperative ATP. In the group with ATP, the pacing maneuver was performed twice, each time applying 8 impulses à 6 Volt x 1.0 milliseconds to the myocardium. High sensitive Troponin T (hsTnT) levels were determined prior to the implantation and thereafter. There was no significant difference in the release of hsTnT between the two randomization groups (delta TnT without ATP in median 0.010 ng/ml [min. -0.016 ng/ml-max. 0.075 ng/ml] vs. with ATP in median 0.013 ng/ml [min. -0.005-0.287 ng/ml], p = 0.323). Setting a hsTnT cutoff of 0.059 ng/dl as a regularly augmented postoperative hsTnT level, no relevant difference between the two groups regarding the postoperative hsTnT levels above this cutoff could be identified (without ATP n = 10 [14.7%] vs. with ATP n = 16 [21.9%], p = 0.287). There was no significant difference in the release of high sensitive Troponin between patients without intraoperative ATP compared to those with intraoperative ATP. Hence, antitachycardia pacing does not seem to cause significant myocardial microdamage. This may further support its use as a painless and efficient method to terminate ventricular tachycardia in high-risk patients.
选择植入式心脏复律除颤器 (ICD) 进行一级和二级预防心源性猝死是首选治疗方法。虽然适当和不适当的 ICD 电击会导致心肌微损伤,但这一点尚不清楚抗心动过速起搏 (ATP) 会导致心肌微损伤。共有 150 名 ICD 接受者(66±12 岁,81.3%为男性,93.3%为一级预防,30.0%为同步化治疗)被随机分配到接受或不接受术中 ATP 的 ICD 植入。在接受 ATP 的组中,起搏操作进行了两次,每次向心肌施加 8 个 6 伏特 x 1.0 毫秒的脉冲。在植入前和之后测定高敏肌钙蛋白 T (hsTnT) 水平。两组之间 hsTnT 的释放没有显著差异(无 ATP 的 delta TnT 中位数为 0.010ng/ml[min.-0.016ng/ml-max.0.075ng/ml]与 ATP 的中位数 0.013ng/ml[min.-0.005-0.287ng/ml],p=0.323)。设定 hsTnT 截断值为 0.059ng/dl 作为常规术后 hsTnT 水平升高,两组术后 hsTnT 水平高于该截断值时,两组之间无显著差异(无 ATP n=10[14.7%]与 ATP n=16[21.9%],p=0.287)。与术中无 ATP 的患者相比,术中使用 ATP 的患者 hsTnT 的释放没有显著差异。因此,抗心动过速起搏似乎不会导致明显的心肌微损伤。这可能进一步支持其作为一种无痛且有效的方法在高危患者中终止室性心动过速的使用。