Ryan Mary M, Spotnitz William D, Gillen Daniel L
Department of Statistics, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, California.
Department of Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia.
Stat Med. 2020 Jun 30;39(14):1941-1951. doi: 10.1002/sim.8522. Epub 2020 Mar 16.
We present a methodology motivated by a controlled trial designed to validate SPOT GRADE, a novel surgical bleeding severity scale. Briefly, the study was designed to quantify inter- and intra-surgeon agreement for characterizing the severity of surgical bleeds via a Kappa statistic. Multiple surgeons were presented with a randomized sequence of controlled bleeding videos and asked to apply the rating system to characterize each wound. Each video was shown multiple times to quantify intra-surgeon reliability, creating clustered data. In addition, videos within the same category may have had different classification probabilities due to changes in blood flow rates and wound sizes. In this work, we propose a new variance estimator for the Kappa statistic, for use in clustered data as well as heterogeneity among items within the same classification category. We then apply this methodology to data from the SPOT GRADE trial.
我们提出了一种方法,该方法源自一项旨在验证新型手术出血严重程度量表SPOT GRADE的对照试验。简而言之,该研究旨在通过卡帕统计量来量化外科医生之间以及外科医生内部对于表征手术出血严重程度的一致性。向多位外科医生展示了一系列随机排列的控制性出血视频,并要求他们应用该评分系统对每个伤口进行表征。每个视频都被多次展示,以量化外科医生内部的可靠性,从而产生聚类数据。此外,由于血流速率和伤口大小的变化,同一类别的视频可能具有不同的分类概率。在这项工作中,我们提出了一种用于卡帕统计量的新方差估计器,用于聚类数据以及同一分类类别中项目之间的异质性。然后,我们将此方法应用于来自SPOT GRADE试验的数据。