Graduate Program in Dentistry, School of Health and Life Sciences, Pontifical Catholic University of Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil.
Medical and Dental Centre of the Military Police of Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil.
Int Endod J. 2020 Jul;53(7):887-894. doi: 10.1111/iej.13293. Epub 2020 Apr 9.
To assess the prevalence of dental emergency visits (DEV) involving pain relief and their relationship with socio-economic and clinical factors in an Australian representative sample in the primary care setting.
Data on reason for visit and patient characteristics were collected from a representative random sample of Australian dentists in private practice surveyed in 2009-2010. Information regarding socio-economic (gender, age, health insurance) and clinical factors (number of teeth, number of decayed teeth, diagnosis and reason for visit [DEV, check-up, other reasons not involving pain relief]) were retrieved from compiled questionnaires. Descriptive statistics were reported, and Poisson regression models were used to assess the association between socio-economic and clinical factors and DEV. Prevalence ratio (PR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated.
A total of 1148 dentists responded (67%), resulting in records from 6504 patients. The overall prevalence of DEV was 20.8%. The unadjusted analysis, according to the reason of visit, revealed the following predictors for DEV: male gender (PR = 1.18; 95% CI = 1.08-1.29), age 18-64 years (PR = 2.70; 95% CI = 2.19-3.33) and over 65 years (PR = 2.64, 95% CI = 2.10-3.32), uninsured patients (PR = 1.36; 95% CI = 1.24-1.49), patients with <20 teeth (PR = 1.19; 95% CI = 1.06-1.33), decayed teeth (PR = 1.64; 95% CI = 1.48-1.81). After adjustment for confounding factors (gender, age, insurance status, number of teeth and decayed teeth) apart from 'dental trauma' (PR = 1.37), all remaining diagnoses had lower PR ('other' PR = 0.19, 'decay' PR = 0.34, 'periodontal' PR = 0.51, 'failed restoration' PR = 0.45) compared with 'pulp/periapical disease'.
In the primary care setting, the diagnoses 'pulp/periapical' and 'dental trauma' had a stronger association with DEV compared with visits not involving relief of pain. Both socio-economic (male gender, older age and uninsured individuals) and clinical factors (tooth loss, decayed teeth, endodontic diseases and dental trauma) were identified as independent risk indicators for DEV in this population. Future public health policies should include specific preventive strategies addressing these factors, aiming to reduce the need for DEV.
评估澳大利亚初级保健中涉及疼痛缓解的牙科急诊就诊(DEV)的流行率及其与社会经济和临床因素的关系。
2009-2010 年,对澳大利亚私人执业牙医进行了一项具有代表性的随机抽样调查,收集了就诊原因和患者特征的数据。从编制的问卷中获取了与社会经济(性别、年龄、健康保险)和临床因素(牙齿数量、龋齿数量、诊断和就诊原因[DEV、检查、其他非疼痛缓解原因])相关的信息。报告了描述性统计数据,并使用泊松回归模型评估了社会经济和临床因素与 DEV 之间的关联。计算了患病率比(PR)和 95%置信区间(CI)。
共有 1148 名牙医(67%)做出了回应,共记录了 6504 名患者的就诊情况。DEV 的总体患病率为 20.8%。未经调整的分析显示,根据就诊原因,以下因素与 DEV 相关:男性(PR=1.18;95%CI=1.08-1.29)、18-64 岁(PR=2.70;95%CI=2.19-3.33)和 65 岁以上(PR=2.64;95%CI=2.10-3.32)、未参保者(PR=1.36;95%CI=1.24-1.49)、牙齿数量少于 20 颗(PR=1.19;95%CI=1.06-1.33)、龋齿(PR=1.64;95%CI=1.48-1.81)。在调整了混杂因素(性别、年龄、保险状况、牙齿数量和龋齿数量)后,除了“牙外伤”(PR=1.37)外,所有其他诊断的 PR 均较低(“其他”PR=0.19,“龋齿”PR=0.34,“牙周病”PR=0.51,“修复失败”PR=0.45),与“牙髓/根尖周疾病”相比。
在初级保健环境中,与不涉及疼痛缓解的就诊相比,“牙髓/根尖周疾病”和“牙外伤”这两种诊断与 DEV 的相关性更强。社会经济因素(男性、年龄较大和未参保者)和临床因素(牙齿缺失、龋齿、牙髓疾病和牙外伤)都被确定为该人群 DEV 的独立危险因素。未来的公共卫生政策应包括针对这些因素的具体预防策略,以减少对 DEV 的需求。