Suppr超能文献

免疫细胞有效剂量对放化疗后食管癌患者淋巴细胞减少症及生存的影响。

The impact of the effective dose to immune cells on lymphopenia and survival of esophageal cancer after chemoradiotherapy.

机构信息

Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA; Department of Radiation Oncology, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, Tianjin, China.

Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals/Seidman Cancer Center and Case Comprehensive Cancer Center of Case Western Reserve University, USA.

出版信息

Radiother Oncol. 2020 May;146:180-186. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2020.02.015. Epub 2020 Mar 19.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To test the hypothesis that effective dose to circulating immune cells (EDIC) impacts the severity of radiation-induced lymphopenia and clinical outcomes of esophageal cancer patients treated with concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

488 esophageal cancer patients treated with CCRT with and without surgery were analyzed. The EDIC model considers the exposure of circulating immune cells as the proportion of blood flow to lung, heart, liver, and the volume of the exposed area of the body, with the basis of mean lung dose (MLD), mean heart dose (MHD), mean liver dose (MlD), and integral dose (ITD) of the body region scanned, calculated as: EDIC=0.12∗MLD+0.08∗MHD+0.15∗0.85∗MlD∗n45+0.45+0.35∗0.85∗nk∗ITD62∗10 Where n is the fraction number. Correlations of EDIC with overall survival (OS), progression free survival (PFS), distant metastasis free survival (DMFS), and locoregional control (LRC) rates were analyzed using both univariable and multivariable Cox models. Lymphopenia during CCRT was graded according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.0.

RESULTS

Grade 4 lymphopenia resulted in inferior clinical outcomes, including OS, PFS, and DMFS. The median EDIC was 3.6 Gy (range, 0.8-6.0 Gy). Higher EDIC was strongly associated with severe lymphopenia, particularly when EDIC was above 4 Gy. Patients with EDIC > 4.0 Gy had more G4 lymphopenia than those with EDIC ≤ 4.0 Gy (67.3% vs. 40.8%; P < 0.001). On multivariate analysis, increasing EDIC was independently and inversely associated with worse OS, PFS, and DMFS.

CONCLUSION

EDIC can be recommended as a useful tool to predict lymphopenia and inferior clinical outcomes, and it should be minimized below 4 Gy.

摘要

目的

检验有效剂量至循环免疫细胞(EDIC)是否会影响接受同期放化疗(CCRT)治疗的食管癌患者的放射诱导性淋巴细胞减少症的严重程度和临床结局这一假说。

材料与方法

对 488 例接受 CCRT 联合或不联合手术治疗的食管癌患者进行了分析。EDIC 模型将循环免疫细胞的暴露视为血流至肺、心脏、肝脏以及身体受照区域体积的比例,以平均肺剂量(MLD)、平均心脏剂量(MHD)、平均肝脏剂量(MlD)和身体扫描区域积分剂量(ITD)为基础,计算方法如下:EDIC=0.12∗MLD+0.08∗MHD+0.15∗0.85∗MlD∗n45+0.45+0.35∗0.85∗nk∗ITD62∗10,其中 n 为分数数。采用单变量和多变量 Cox 模型分析 EDIC 与总生存(OS)、无进展生存(PFS)、无远处转移生存(DMFS)和局部区域控制(LRC)率的相关性。CCRT 期间的淋巴细胞减少症根据不良事件常用术语标准 4.0 进行分级。

结果

4 级淋巴细胞减少症导致临床结局恶化,包括 OS、PFS 和 DMFS。EDIC 的中位数为 3.6Gy(范围:0.8-6.0Gy)。EDIC 较高与严重的淋巴细胞减少症强烈相关,尤其是当 EDIC 高于 4Gy 时。EDIC>4.0Gy 的患者比 EDIC≤4.0Gy 的患者发生 4 级淋巴细胞减少症更多(67.3%比 40.8%;P<0.001)。多变量分析显示,EDIC 增加与 OS、PFS 和 DMFS 恶化独立且呈负相关。

结论

EDIC 可作为预测淋巴细胞减少症和临床结局不良的有用工具,应将其控制在 4Gy 以下。

相似文献

1
The impact of the effective dose to immune cells on lymphopenia and survival of esophageal cancer after chemoradiotherapy.
Radiother Oncol. 2020 May;146:180-186. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2020.02.015. Epub 2020 Mar 19.
2
The effective radiation dose to immune cells predicts lymphopenia and inferior cancer control in locally advanced NSCLC.
Radiother Oncol. 2024 Jan;190:110030. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2023.110030. Epub 2023 Nov 24.
3
The predictors of lymphopenia and its effects on survival in locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.
Cancer Biol Ther. 2024 Dec 31;25(1):2371632. doi: 10.1080/15384047.2024.2371632. Epub 2024 Jul 1.
9
Impact of Radiation Dose to Circulating Immune Cells on Tumor Control and Survival in Esophageal Cancer.
Cancer Biother Radiopharm. 2023 Aug;38(6):380-387. doi: 10.1089/cbr.2021.0250. Epub 2021 Dec 9.
10
Lymphopenia and Radiation Dose to Circulating Lymphocytes With Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation in Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma.
Adv Radiat Oncol. 2020 Apr 19;5(5):880-888. doi: 10.1016/j.adro.2020.03.021. eCollection 2020 Sep-Oct.

引用本文的文献

4
Lymphocytopenia following adjuvant radiotherapy for breast cancer.
Precis Radiat Oncol. 2024 Feb 29;8(1):22-29. doi: 10.1002/pro6.1221. eCollection 2024 Mar.
7
Poor Prognostic Effects of Lymphocytopenia Induced by Preoperative Chemoradiotherapy in Rectal Cancer.
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2024 Nov 1;25(11):3799-3805. doi: 10.31557/APJCP.2024.25.11.3799.
8
Correlation of dynamic blood dose with clinical outcomes in radiotherapy for head-and-neck cancer.
Radiother Oncol. 2025 Jan;202:110603. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2024.110603. Epub 2024 Oct 30.

本文引用的文献

2
Cardiac dose is associated with immunosuppression and poor survival in locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer.
Radiother Oncol. 2018 Sep;128(3):498-504. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2018.05.017. Epub 2018 May 30.
4
Durvalumab after Chemoradiotherapy in Stage III Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer.
N Engl J Med. 2017 Nov 16;377(20):1919-1929. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1709937. Epub 2017 Sep 8.
5
Lymphocyte Nadir and Esophageal Cancer Survival Outcomes After Chemoradiation Therapy.
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2017 Sep 1;99(1):128-135. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2017.05.037. Epub 2017 Jun 1.
6
Toward Precision Radiotherapy for Use with Immune Checkpoint Blockers.
Clin Cancer Res. 2018 Jan 15;24(2):259-265. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-16-0037. Epub 2017 Jul 27.
8
Heart Dose Is an Independent Dosimetric Predictor of Overall Survival in Locally Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.
J Thorac Oncol. 2017 Feb;12(2):293-301. doi: 10.1016/j.jtho.2016.09.134. Epub 2016 Oct 12.
9
NAFLD causes selective CD4(+) T lymphocyte loss and promotes hepatocarcinogenesis.
Nature. 2016 Mar 10;531(7593):253-7. doi: 10.1038/nature16969. Epub 2016 Mar 2.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验