Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA; Department of Radiation Oncology, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, Tianjin, China.
Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals/Seidman Cancer Center and Case Comprehensive Cancer Center of Case Western Reserve University, USA.
Radiother Oncol. 2020 May;146:180-186. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2020.02.015. Epub 2020 Mar 19.
To test the hypothesis that effective dose to circulating immune cells (EDIC) impacts the severity of radiation-induced lymphopenia and clinical outcomes of esophageal cancer patients treated with concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT).
488 esophageal cancer patients treated with CCRT with and without surgery were analyzed. The EDIC model considers the exposure of circulating immune cells as the proportion of blood flow to lung, heart, liver, and the volume of the exposed area of the body, with the basis of mean lung dose (MLD), mean heart dose (MHD), mean liver dose (MlD), and integral dose (ITD) of the body region scanned, calculated as: EDIC=0.12∗MLD+0.08∗MHD+0.15∗0.85∗MlD∗n45+0.45+0.35∗0.85∗nk∗ITD62∗10 Where n is the fraction number. Correlations of EDIC with overall survival (OS), progression free survival (PFS), distant metastasis free survival (DMFS), and locoregional control (LRC) rates were analyzed using both univariable and multivariable Cox models. Lymphopenia during CCRT was graded according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.0.
Grade 4 lymphopenia resulted in inferior clinical outcomes, including OS, PFS, and DMFS. The median EDIC was 3.6 Gy (range, 0.8-6.0 Gy). Higher EDIC was strongly associated with severe lymphopenia, particularly when EDIC was above 4 Gy. Patients with EDIC > 4.0 Gy had more G4 lymphopenia than those with EDIC ≤ 4.0 Gy (67.3% vs. 40.8%; P < 0.001). On multivariate analysis, increasing EDIC was independently and inversely associated with worse OS, PFS, and DMFS.
EDIC can be recommended as a useful tool to predict lymphopenia and inferior clinical outcomes, and it should be minimized below 4 Gy.
检验有效剂量至循环免疫细胞(EDIC)是否会影响接受同期放化疗(CCRT)治疗的食管癌患者的放射诱导性淋巴细胞减少症的严重程度和临床结局这一假说。
对 488 例接受 CCRT 联合或不联合手术治疗的食管癌患者进行了分析。EDIC 模型将循环免疫细胞的暴露视为血流至肺、心脏、肝脏以及身体受照区域体积的比例,以平均肺剂量(MLD)、平均心脏剂量(MHD)、平均肝脏剂量(MlD)和身体扫描区域积分剂量(ITD)为基础,计算方法如下:EDIC=0.12∗MLD+0.08∗MHD+0.15∗0.85∗MlD∗n45+0.45+0.35∗0.85∗nk∗ITD62∗10,其中 n 为分数数。采用单变量和多变量 Cox 模型分析 EDIC 与总生存(OS)、无进展生存(PFS)、无远处转移生存(DMFS)和局部区域控制(LRC)率的相关性。CCRT 期间的淋巴细胞减少症根据不良事件常用术语标准 4.0 进行分级。
4 级淋巴细胞减少症导致临床结局恶化,包括 OS、PFS 和 DMFS。EDIC 的中位数为 3.6Gy(范围:0.8-6.0Gy)。EDIC 较高与严重的淋巴细胞减少症强烈相关,尤其是当 EDIC 高于 4Gy 时。EDIC>4.0Gy 的患者比 EDIC≤4.0Gy 的患者发生 4 级淋巴细胞减少症更多(67.3%比 40.8%;P<0.001)。多变量分析显示,EDIC 增加与 OS、PFS 和 DMFS 恶化独立且呈负相关。
EDIC 可作为预测淋巴细胞减少症和临床结局不良的有用工具,应将其控制在 4Gy 以下。