Department of Medicine, Michigan State University, 788 Service Road, Room B301 Clinical Center, East Lansing, MI, 48824, USA.
Division of Oncology and Hematology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, USA.
BMC Med Educ. 2020 Mar 18;20(1):79. doi: 10.1186/s12909-020-1974-3.
To evaluate if United States Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE) Step 1, USMLE Step 2 CK, USMLE Step 3, and residency third-year in-service training exam (ITE) scores predict the results of American Board of Internal Medicine Certifying Exam (ABIM-CE).
We performed a retrospective review of USMLE Step 1, USMLE Step 2 CK, USMLE Step 3, third-year residency ITE scores and ABIM-CE results of IM residents at our residency program from 2004 through 2017. Statistical analysis was perfrormed using Pearson correlation coefficient, and logistic regression to assess the relationship between USMLE Step 1, USMLE Step 2CK, USMLE Step 3, 3rd year ITE scores and ABIM-CE results. We used Multivariate logistic regression to predict pass or fail results in ABIM-CE based on USMLE and third-year ITE test scores controlling for other covariates.
Among 114 Internal Medicine MD residents included in the study, 92% (n = 105) passed the ABIM-CE. The OR of passing ABIM-CE was 2.70 (95% CI = 1.38-5.29), 2.31 (95% CI = 1.33-4.01), and 1.63 (95% CI = 0.81-3.29) with a ten-point increase in USMLE Step 1, USMLE Step 2 CK and USMLE Step 3 scores respectively. The OR of ABIM-CE passing chance was 2.96 (95% CI = 0.95-9.20), with a ten-point increase in the average score of the above three exams. A 5 % increase in ITE percentage raised the likelihood of passing ABIM-CE (OR 2.92, 95% CI 1.15-7.38). All residents who failed ABIM-CE had Step 1 scores < 220. Among 31 residents with Step 2 CK score < 220, 20% (n = 6) failed ABIM. Similarly, 9% of residents with USMLE Step 3 score < 220 failed ABIM-CE; all residents who failed had scored < 220. The probability curve predicted that the chance of passing ABIM- CE was around 80% with USMLE scores greater than 200 and increased to almost 100% with USMLE scores of 250 or more.
USMLE Step 1, USMLE Step 2 CK, and third-year ITE scores can predict the chances of passing ABIM-CE. The third-year ITE score has a higher preditive value compared to USMLE Step 1 and USMLE Step 2 scores. USMLE Step 1 scores more predictive of ABIM-CE results compared to USMLE Step 2CK scores. Thus, residency programs can identify internal medicine residents at risk of failing ABIM-CE and formulate interventions at an early stage during residency training. Measures such as enrolling them in question banks or board review courses can be helpful in improving their chances of passing ABIM-CE.
评估美国医师执照考试(USMLE)第 1 步、第 2 CK 步、第 3 步和住院医师第 3 年的在职培训考试(ITE)成绩是否能预测美国内科医师学会认证考试(ABIM-CE)的结果。
我们对我们住院医师计划 2004 年至 2017 年期间的 IM 住院医师的 USMLE 第 1 步、第 2 CK 步、第 3 步、第 3 年住院医师 ITE 成绩和 ABIM-CE 结果进行了回顾性分析。使用 Pearson 相关系数和逻辑回归来评估 USMLE 第 1 步、第 2 CK 步、第 3 步、第 3 年 ITE 成绩与 ABIM-CE 结果之间的关系。我们使用多元逻辑回归根据 USMLE 和第 3 年 ITE 考试成绩预测 ABIM-CE 的通过或失败结果,同时控制其他协变量。
在纳入研究的 114 名内科医学 MD 住院医师中,92%(n=105)通过了 ABIM-CE。通过 ABIM-CE 的优势比(OR)分别为 2.70(95%CI=1.38-5.29)、2.31(95%CI=1.33-4.01)和 1.63(95%CI=0.81-3.29),USMLE 第 1 步、第 2 CK 步和第 3 步的分数分别增加了 10 分。ABIM-CE 通过机会的 OR 为 2.96(95%CI=0.95-9.20),上述三项考试的平均分数增加了 10 分。ITE 百分比增加 5%会增加通过 ABIM-CE 的可能性(OR 2.92,95%CI 1.15-7.38)。所有 ABIM-CE 失败的住院医师的第 1 步分数均<220。在 31 名第 2 CK 分数<220 的住院医师中,20%(n=6)未通过 ABIM。同样,9%的第 3 步 USMLE 分数<220 的住院医师未通过 ABIM-CE;所有失败的住院医师得分均<220。概率曲线预测,USMLE 分数大于 200 时通过 ABIM-CE 的机会约为 80%,USMLE 分数增加到 250 或更高时几乎达到 100%。
USMLE 第 1 步、第 2 CK 步和第 3 年 ITE 分数可以预测通过 ABIM-CE 的机会。第 3 年 ITE 分数比 USMLE 第 1 步和第 2 CK 分数具有更高的预测价值。与 USMLE 第 2 CK 分数相比,USMLE 第 1 步分数更能预测 ABIM-CE 的结果。因此,住院医师计划可以识别出有 ABIM-CE 失败风险的内科住院医师,并在住院医师培训期间尽早制定干预措施。例如,让他们参加题库或董事会复习课程等措施有助于提高他们通过 ABIM-CE 的机会。