Department of Human Movement Sciences, 2016 Student Recreation Center, Old Dominion University, Norfolk, VA, 23529, USA.
Department of Kinesiology, Recreation, and Sport Studies, The University of Tennessee, 322 HPER Building, 1914 Andy Holt Avenue, Knoxville, TN, 37996-2700, USA.
J Ultrasound. 2021 Mar;24(1):49-55. doi: 10.1007/s40477-020-00450-1. Epub 2020 Mar 18.
Diagnostic ultrasound has accurately and reliably been utilized by clinicians to determine ACL morphology at the tibial insertion site, specifically measuring the entire ACL diameter, the anteromedial bundle (AM), and the posterolateral bundle. However, intra- and inter-rater reliability of these measures in a research setting is unknown. The purpose of this study was to determine intra- and inter-rater reliability of ultrasound measures of ACL diameter and AM diameter in researchers with low-to-moderate ultrasound experience. We hypothesized that intra- and inter-rater reliability of ACL and AM diameters would reach acceptable levels, a minimal intraclass correlation (ICC) of 0.6 and a desired ICC of 0.8 with an α of 0.05 and β of 0.20. Fourteen volunteers participated in this study. During the ACL ultrasound measures, participants were seated with their knee flexed to at least 90°. Each rater recorded two images of both the right and left ACL and AM bundles. Next, participants were re-examined by rater one for intra-rater reliability analyses. Two-way random ICCs were conducted for intra-rater (between sessions) and inter-rater reliability for both the full ACL and the AM bundle diameters. Standard errors between sessions for Rater 1's AM bundle and ACL diameters were less than 0.03 cm. Intra-rater reliability was higher in AM bundles compared to full ACL, 0.76 versus 0.59, respectively. Standard errors between Rater 1 and Rater 2 were less than 0.03 cm. Inter-rater reliability was higher in AM bundles compared to full ACL, 0.71 versus 0.41, respectively. The results of the study indicate researchers with low-to-moderate training with ultrasound measures can locate and measure the ACL, but with greater reliability using the AM.
诊断超声已被临床医生准确可靠地用于确定 ACL 在胫骨附着点的形态,特别是测量 ACL 的整个直径、前内束(AM)和后外束。然而,在研究环境中,这些测量的内部和外部可靠性尚不清楚。本研究的目的是确定具有低到中等超声经验的研究人员测量 ACL 直径和 AM 直径的内部和外部可靠性。我们假设 ACL 和 AM 直径的内部和外部可靠性将达到可接受的水平,最小组内相关系数(ICC)为 0.6,理想 ICC 为 0.8,α 为 0.05,β 为 0.20。14 名志愿者参加了这项研究。在 ACL 超声测量过程中,参与者坐在座位上,膝盖至少弯曲 90°。每个评估者记录了右膝和左膝 ACL 和 AM 束的两个图像。然后,参与者由评估者 1 进行再次检查,以进行内部可靠性分析。对内部评估者(两次评估之间)和外部评估者对 ACL 和 AM 束直径的可靠性进行了双向随机 ICC。Rater 1 的 AM 束和 ACL 直径的两次评估之间的标准误差小于 0.03cm。AM 束的内部可靠性高于 ACL,分别为 0.76 和 0.59。Rater 1 和 Rater 2 之间的标准误差小于 0.03cm。AM 束的外部可靠性高于 ACL,分别为 0.71 和 0.41。研究结果表明,具有低到中等超声测量培训的研究人员可以定位和测量 ACL,但使用 AM 束时具有更高的可靠性。