Suppr超能文献

前交叉韧带超声测量的组内和组间可靠性。

Intra- and inter-rater reliability of ultrasound measures of the anterior cruciate ligament.

机构信息

Department of Human Movement Sciences, 2016 Student Recreation Center, Old Dominion University, Norfolk, VA, 23529, USA.

Department of Kinesiology, Recreation, and Sport Studies, The University of Tennessee, 322 HPER Building, 1914 Andy Holt Avenue, Knoxville, TN, 37996-2700, USA.

出版信息

J Ultrasound. 2021 Mar;24(1):49-55. doi: 10.1007/s40477-020-00450-1. Epub 2020 Mar 18.

Abstract

Diagnostic ultrasound has accurately and reliably been utilized by clinicians to determine ACL morphology at the tibial insertion site, specifically measuring the entire ACL diameter, the anteromedial bundle (AM), and the posterolateral bundle. However, intra- and inter-rater reliability of these measures in a research setting is unknown. The purpose of this study was to determine intra- and inter-rater reliability of ultrasound measures of ACL diameter and AM diameter in researchers with low-to-moderate ultrasound experience. We hypothesized that intra- and inter-rater reliability of ACL and AM diameters would reach acceptable levels, a minimal intraclass correlation (ICC) of 0.6 and a desired ICC of 0.8 with an α of 0.05 and β of 0.20. Fourteen volunteers participated in this study. During the ACL ultrasound measures, participants were seated with their knee flexed to at least 90°. Each rater recorded two images of both the right and left ACL and AM bundles. Next, participants were re-examined by rater one for intra-rater reliability analyses. Two-way random ICCs were conducted for intra-rater (between sessions) and inter-rater reliability for both the full ACL and the AM bundle diameters. Standard errors between sessions for Rater 1's AM bundle and ACL diameters were less than 0.03 cm. Intra-rater reliability was higher in AM bundles compared to full ACL, 0.76 versus 0.59, respectively. Standard errors between Rater 1 and Rater 2 were less than 0.03 cm. Inter-rater reliability was higher in AM bundles compared to full ACL, 0.71 versus 0.41, respectively. The results of the study indicate researchers with low-to-moderate training with ultrasound measures can locate and measure the ACL, but with greater reliability using the AM.

摘要

诊断超声已被临床医生准确可靠地用于确定 ACL 在胫骨附着点的形态,特别是测量 ACL 的整个直径、前内束(AM)和后外束。然而,在研究环境中,这些测量的内部和外部可靠性尚不清楚。本研究的目的是确定具有低到中等超声经验的研究人员测量 ACL 直径和 AM 直径的内部和外部可靠性。我们假设 ACL 和 AM 直径的内部和外部可靠性将达到可接受的水平,最小组内相关系数(ICC)为 0.6,理想 ICC 为 0.8,α 为 0.05,β 为 0.20。14 名志愿者参加了这项研究。在 ACL 超声测量过程中,参与者坐在座位上,膝盖至少弯曲 90°。每个评估者记录了右膝和左膝 ACL 和 AM 束的两个图像。然后,参与者由评估者 1 进行再次检查,以进行内部可靠性分析。对内部评估者(两次评估之间)和外部评估者对 ACL 和 AM 束直径的可靠性进行了双向随机 ICC。Rater 1 的 AM 束和 ACL 直径的两次评估之间的标准误差小于 0.03cm。AM 束的内部可靠性高于 ACL,分别为 0.76 和 0.59。Rater 1 和 Rater 2 之间的标准误差小于 0.03cm。AM 束的外部可靠性高于 ACL,分别为 0.71 和 0.41。研究结果表明,具有低到中等超声测量培训的研究人员可以定位和测量 ACL,但使用 AM 束时具有更高的可靠性。

相似文献

2
Anatomy of the anterior cruciate ligament with regard to its two bundles.前交叉韧带双束的解剖结构
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2007 Jan;454:35-47. doi: 10.1097/BLO.0b013e31802b4a59.
7
9
Biomechanics of the human triple-bundle anterior cruciate ligament.人体三束前交叉韧带的生物力学。
Arthroscopy. 2012 Feb;28(2):247-54. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2011.07.019. Epub 2011 Oct 21.

本文引用的文献

4
Sonographic Examination of Knee Ligaments.膝关节韧带的超声检查
Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2015 Aug;94(8):e77-9. doi: 10.1097/PHM.0000000000000313.
5
Understanding Bland Altman analysis.理解布兰德-奥特曼分析。
Biochem Med (Zagreb). 2015 Jun 5;25(2):141-51. doi: 10.11613/BM.2015.015. eCollection 2015.
9
Sonographic anatomy of the ankle.踝关节的超声解剖
J Ultrasound. 2013 Aug 3;17(2):79-87. doi: 10.1007/s40477-013-0025-x. eCollection 2014 Jun.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验