Rutgers University.
J Health Polit Policy Law. 2020 Aug 1;45(4):633-646. doi: 10.1215/03616878-8255553.
Within the American system of shared power among institutions, the executive branch has played an increasingly prominent policy role relative to Congress. The vast administrative discretion wielded by the executive branch has elevated the power of the president. Republican and Democratic presidents alike have employed an arsenal of administrative tools to pursue their policy goals: high-level appointments, administrative rule making, executive orders, proclamations, memoranda, guidance documents, directives, dear colleague letters, signing statements, reorganizations, funding decisions, and more. Presidents Obama and Trump employed most of these tools in an effort to shape the implementation and outcomes of the Affordable Care Act (ACA) during its first decade. This article focuses on the Obama and Trump administrations' use of comprehensive waivers to shape ACA implementation. The Obama administration had mixed success using waivers to convince Republican states to expand Medicaid. Compared to Obama, the Trump administration has found it harder to accomplish its policy goals through waivers, but if the courts support the Trump administration's work requirement and 1332 waiver initiatives, it would enable the president to use waivers to achieve an ever broader set of goals, including program retrenchment.
在美国机构间权力共享的体制下,行政部门相对于国会发挥了越来越突出的政策作用。行政部门拥有广泛的行政裁量权,这提升了总统的权力。共和党和民主党总统都利用了一系列行政工具来追求其政策目标:高级任命、行政规则制定、行政命令、公告、备忘录、指导文件、指令、亲爱的同事信、签署声明、改组、资金决策等等。奥巴马总统和特朗普总统都在努力利用这些工具塑造平价医疗法案(ACA)在其第一个十年的实施和结果。本文重点关注奥巴马和特朗普政府使用全面豁免来塑造 ACA 实施的情况。奥巴马政府在利用豁免说服共和党州扩大医疗补助方面取得了喜忧参半的成功。与奥巴马相比,特朗普政府通过豁免来实现其政策目标更加困难,但如果法院支持特朗普政府的工作要求和 1332 豁免倡议,这将使总统能够利用豁免来实现更广泛的目标,包括计划紧缩。