Boise State University, ID, USA.
J Learn Disabil. 2021 Jan/Feb;54(1):54-65. doi: 10.1177/0022219420908906. Epub 2020 Mar 18.
In this study, we examined the relationship of special education teachers' performance on the Recognizing Effective Special Education Teachers (RESET) Explicit Instruction observation protocol with student growth on academic measures. Special education teachers provided video-recorded observations of three instructional lessons along with data from standardized, curriculum-based academic measures at the beginning, middle, and end of the school year for the students in the instructional group. Teachers' lessons were evaluated by external, trained raters. Data were analyzed using many-faceted Rasch measurement (MFRM), correlation, and multiple regression. Teacher performance on the overall protocol did not account for statistically significant variance in student growth beyond that of students' beginning of the year academic performance. Teacher performance on an abbreviated protocol comprised of items that had average or higher item difficulties on the MFRM analysis accounted for an additional 4.5% of variance beyond that of beginning of the year student performance. Implications for further research are discussed.
在这项研究中,我们考察了特殊教育教师在 Recognizing Effective Special Education Teachers (RESET) Explicit Instruction 观察方案上的表现与学生在学业成绩上的增长之间的关系。特殊教育教师提供了三个教学课程的视频记录观察,以及学生在教学组中在学年开始、中期和结束时的标准化、基于课程的学业成绩数据。教师的课程由外部训练有素的评估人员进行评估。使用多方面 Rasch 测量(MFRM)、相关和多元回归分析数据。教师在整个方案上的表现并不能解释学生在学年开始后的学业成绩增长的显著差异。在 MFRM 分析中,具有平均或更高项目难度的简化方案项目上的教师表现,除了学生在学年开始时的表现之外,还额外解释了 4.5%的方差。讨论了进一步研究的意义。