Texas State University, 601 University Drive, San Marcos, TX, 78666, USA.
University of Tennessee, 502 Strong Hall, 1621 Cumberland Avenue, Knoxville, TN, 37996, USA.
Forensic Sci Int. 2020 May;310:110224. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2020.110224. Epub 2020 Feb 28.
Fire-altered or fragmentary bone presents a challenge to forensic anthropologists and bioarchaeologists due to its characteristic friability. A potential solution to this problem is the use of consolidant materials on fragile osteological material, including burned remains. Although anthropologists and odontologists employ a variety of consolidant materials, there is no consensus regarding which material is most appropriate. Four easily obtained and commonly used consolidants, Acryloid™ B-72, Acrysol™ WS-24, Rhoplex™ B-60A, and Butvar® B-98, were compared to assess ease of material application and ability to stabilize burned bone. Each consolidant was applied to a subgroup of the study population at a 10% concentration. Total dry time per specimen, ease of solution preparation and application, and any alteration to the bone's appearance were recorded to assess the practical use of each material in field recovery settings. Nanoindentation, drop weight impact, and forced vibration tests were then performed to assess degree of stabilization. These tests were chosen to mimic possible real-world scenarios where burned bone may undergo damage during and after recovery, including repeated handling and transportation from the fire scene to the lab. Based on both qualitative and quantitative data collected, Acryloid™ B-72 is the most suitable consolidant tested to stabilize burned or fragmentary bone during recovery efforts. If the dry time for Rhoplex™ B-60A could be reduced by using a different solvent, such as acetone, Rhoplex™ B-60A would also be appropriate. Highly calcined areas, and targeted structures that could be utilized for positive identification, including teeth and the frontal sinus, should preferentially be consolidated with Acryloid™ B-72 in the field prior to recovery.
火烧或残缺的骨骼因其易碎性给法医人类学家和生物考古学家带来了挑战。解决这个问题的一种潜在方法是在脆弱的骨骼材料上使用加固材料,包括烧骨。尽管人类学家和牙科学者使用了各种加固材料,但哪种材料最合适尚未达成共识。本研究比较了四种容易获得且常用的加固剂:Acryloid™ B-72、Acrysol™ WS-24、Rhoplex™ B-60A 和 Butvar® B-98,以评估材料的应用便利性及其稳定烧骨的能力。将每种加固剂以 10%的浓度应用于研究人群的一个亚组。记录每个标本的总干燥时间、溶液制备和应用的容易程度以及骨骼外观的任何变化,以评估每种材料在野外恢复环境中的实际用途。然后进行纳米压痕、落锤冲击和强制振动测试,以评估稳定程度。选择这些测试来模拟可能的现实世界场景,在这些场景中,烧骨在恢复过程中和恢复后可能会受到损伤,包括从火灾现场到实验室的反复搬运和运输。基于定性和定量数据,Acryloid™ B-72 是最适合稳定烧骨或碎片骨的加固剂。如果 Rhoplex™ B-60A 的干燥时间可以通过使用不同的溶剂(如丙酮)来缩短,那么 Rhoplex™ B-60A 也将是合适的选择。在野外恢复之前,应优先使用 Acryloid™ B-72 对高度煅烧区域和可用于正面识别的目标结构进行加固,包括牙齿和额窦。