Fan J, Ji J Q, Zhang X, Guo X W, Yao Y, Zhou J Q, Li S Z, Yuan F, Yu G R, Cheng L M
Department of Orthopaedics, Tongji Hospital of Tongji University, Shanghai 200065, China.
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2020 Mar 1;58(3):213-219. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0529-5815.2020.03.009.
To explore the operative effect and treatment strategies for the low distal humerus fracture. A retrospective analysis was conducted on the clinical data of 16 patients with the low distal humerus fracture between January 2016 and January 2018 at Department of Orthopaedics, Shanghai Tongji Hospital Affiliated to Tongji University.All fractures were coronal fractures of humeral head, partly combined fractures of humeral trochlea or posterior part. Fractures were classified according to Dubberley classification as 9 cases in type Ⅰ, 3 cases in typeⅡ and 4 cases in type Ⅲ.Selection of the kind of operative approach and internal fixation was made according to the fracture type and shape. For simple coronal fractures of humeral head or combining humeral trochlea fractures, which were relatively stable, single or multiple countersunk screws fixation by the lateral approach were chosen.For humeral head coronal fractures, which combining obviously displaced comminuted humeral trochlea factures, posterolateral locking plates and countersunk screws internal fixation by the olecranon osteotomy approach were chosen. The incision and elbow soft tissues were observed within 2 weeks after operation.The radiographic evaluation of fracture reduction, bone healing, internal fixation, arthritis and elbow range of motion were made at 3, 6, 12 months after operation. The Mayo elbow functional scores were documented for analysis of elbow joint function, and compared between different surgery groups by Kruskal-Wallis test. The follow-up time was (22.1±9.2)months(range: 15 to 39 months). The incisions healed well in 2 weeks after operation without soft tissue infection, necrosis or vascular complications. There was no fracture reduction loss or internal fixation loosening according to radiographic evaluation 3 months after operation. One case of ectopic ossification was observed 6 months after operation and inhibited by the treatment of non steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs.One case of ulnar neuritis occurred after operation and released after removing the long screw and loosing the ulnar.Osteoarthritis images were observed at the end of follow-up.Arc of motion was (120.4±11.2) ° in flexion and (5.5±1.9) ° in extension. The Mayo score was 88.7±9.1, including 11 excellent, 4 good, and 1 fair.The Mayo score was 90.1±3.7 in Dubberley classification type Ⅰcases, 89.7±4.6 in type Ⅱ cases and 84.5±5.8 in type Ⅲ cases. There were no significant differences in Mayo scores between 3 types cases according to Kruskal-Wallis test. Choosing the appropriate surgical approach and composite internal fixation according to the fracture types and shapes of low distal humerus fracture, anatomic reduction of the articular surface and early functional exercise are the keys to obtain ideal curative effect.
探讨肱骨远端低位骨折的手术效果及治疗策略。回顾性分析2016年1月至2018年1月同济大学附属上海第十人民医院骨科收治的16例肱骨远端低位骨折患者的临床资料。所有骨折均为肱骨头冠状骨折,部分合并肱骨滑车或后部骨折。根据Dubberley分型,Ⅰ型9例,Ⅱ型3例,Ⅲ型4例。根据骨折类型和形态选择手术入路及内固定方式。对于相对稳定的单纯肱骨头冠状骨折或合并肱骨滑车骨折,采用外侧入路单枚或多枚埋头螺钉固定。对于合并明显移位的粉碎性肱骨滑车骨折的肱骨头冠状骨折,采用尺骨鹰嘴截骨入路行后外侧锁定钢板及埋头螺钉内固定。术后2周内观察切口及肘部软组织情况。术后3、6、12个月进行骨折复位、骨愈合、内固定、关节炎及肘关节活动度的影像学评估。记录Mayo肘关节功能评分以分析肘关节功能,并采用Kruskal-Wallis检验比较不同手术组之间的差异。随访时间为(22.1±9.2)个月(范围:15至39个月)。术后2周切口愈合良好,无软组织感染、坏死及血管并发症。术后3个月影像学评估显示无骨折复位丢失或内固定松动。术后6个月观察到1例异位骨化,经非甾体类抗炎药治疗后得到抑制。术后发生1例尺神经炎,取出长螺钉并松解尺神经后缓解。随访末期观察到骨关节炎影像。屈伸活动度为(120.4±11.2)°,伸展活动度为(5.5±1.9)°。Mayo评分88.7±9.1,其中优11例,良4例,可1例。Dubberley分型Ⅰ型患者Mayo评分90.1±3.7,Ⅱ型患者89.7±4.6,Ⅲ型患者84.5±5.8。根据Kruskal-Wallis检验,3种类型患者的Mayo评分无显著差异。根据肱骨远端低位骨折的类型和形态选择合适的手术入路及复合内固定,关节面解剖复位及早期功能锻炼是获得理想疗效的关键。