Department of Microbiology, Immunology, and Transplantation, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Department of Hematology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Clin Infect Dis. 2021 May 4;72(9):1577-1584. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciaa295.
Invasive aspergillosis (IA) remains a potentially lethal disease and requires timely diagnosis and initiation of antifungal therapy. Recently, the IMMY lateral flow assay (LFA), the OLM Diagnostics lateral flow device (LFD), and the Wako turbidimetric β-d-glucan assay have been approved for use as a diagnostic aid. However, their performance in diagnosing IA on serum samples from at-risk patients and the added value to the existing detection of serum galactomannan remain to be investigated.
We prospectively collected serum samples from 239 hematology patients and evaluated the diagnostic performance of these 3 assays while using the 2019 EORTC/MSG definitions (study number S59863/S61797, NCT03004092).
We identified 5 cases of proven IA, 36 cases of probable IA, and 188 controls. The LFA had the highest negative predictive value (NPV) and sensitivity (0.90 and 0.49, respectively) while galactomannan detection had the highest positive predictive value and specificity (0.93 and 0.99, respectively). Sensitivity was not significantly different between both tests. When used in combination, the highest NPV was seen in patients with a negative LFA and a negative β-d-glucan test. The sensitivity of the LFD was significantly lower than the LFA. After omitting serum galactomannan from the definitions to control for incorporation bias, the sensitivity of the LFA outperformed galactomannan detection (0.41 vs 0.31, P = .046).
The LFA is a fast and effective alternative to serum galactomannan detection for the diagnosis of IA and is especially useful for centers with low sample throughputs. The addition of the Wako β-D-glucan assay further improves the diagnostic performance.
侵袭性曲霉病(IA)仍然是一种潜在致命的疾病,需要及时诊断和启动抗真菌治疗。最近,IMMY 侧向流动检测(LFA)、OLM Diagnostics 侧向流动检测设备(LFD)和 Wako 比浊法 β-D-葡聚糖检测已被批准用于辅助诊断。然而,它们在诊断高危患者血清样本中的 IA 方面的性能以及对现有血清半乳甘露聚糖检测的附加值仍有待研究。
我们前瞻性地收集了 239 例血液科患者的血清样本,并使用 2019 年 EORTC/MSG 定义(研究编号 S59863/S61797,NCT03004092)评估了这 3 种检测方法的诊断性能。
我们共鉴定出 5 例确诊 IA、36 例可能 IA 和 188 例对照。LFA 的阴性预测值(NPV)和敏感性最高(分别为 0.90 和 0.49),而半乳甘露聚糖检测的阳性预测值和特异性最高(分别为 0.93 和 0.99)。两种检测方法的敏感性无显著差异。当两者联合使用时,在 LFA 阴性和 β-D-葡聚糖检测阴性的患者中可获得最高的 NPV。LFD 的敏感性明显低于 LFA。在排除血清半乳甘露聚糖以控制纳入偏倚后,LFA 的敏感性优于半乳甘露聚糖检测(0.41 比 0.31,P=0.046)。
LFA 是一种快速有效的血清半乳甘露聚糖检测替代方法,尤其适用于样本通量较低的中心。添加 Wako β-D-葡聚糖检测可进一步提高诊断性能。