Division of Hematology, Oncology and Transplantation, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Division of Biostatistics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Cancer Med. 2020 May;9(10):3400-3406. doi: 10.1002/cam4.3009. Epub 2020 Mar 19.
The impact of using adjuvant chemotherapy following cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) in patients with appendiceal adenocarcinoma is not known. The aim of this study was to assess the impact of adjuvant chemotherapy following complete cytoreduction in patients with appendiceal adenocarcinoma.
Retrospective medical record review of all patients with appendiceal adenocarcinoma treated at our institution between 2006 and 2015. Kaplan-Meier plots were used to summarize overall survival (OS) and relapse-free survival over time, and log-rank tests and Cox proportional hazards models were used to test for differences in survival between groups.
A total of 103 patients with appendiceal adenocarcinoma received care at our institution during the study period. Complete cytoreduction (cytoreductive score 0-1) was achieved in 68 patients (66%). Of these 68 patients, 26 received adjuvant chemotherapy. The most common regimens were capecitabine (n = 11), capecitabine plus oxaliplatin (n = 7), and 5-FU plus oxaliplatin (n = 6). Tumor histopathology and grade, and the ability to achieve complete cytoreduction were significant predictors of overall survival. The median OS for non-low-grade and well-differentiated tumor patients who received adjuvant chemotherapy following complete cytoreduction was 9.03 years, compared to 2.88 years for patients who did not receive adjuvant chemotherapy (P = .02). Among low-grade and well-differentiated tumor patients who underwent complete cytoreduction, there was no statistically significant difference in OS between those who received adjuvant chemotherapy and those who did not.
Adjuvant chemotherapy seems to have benefit in appendiceal cancer patients with non-low-grade or well-differentiated tumor type but not in low-grade or well-differentiated tumors.
在接受细胞减灭术(CRS)和腹腔热灌注化疗(HIPEC)后使用辅助化疗对阑尾腺癌患者的影响尚不清楚。本研究旨在评估在阑尾腺癌患者中进行完全细胞减灭术后辅助化疗的影响。
回顾性分析 2006 年至 2015 年期间在我院接受治疗的所有阑尾腺癌患者的病历。使用 Kaplan-Meier 图总结随时间推移的总生存期(OS)和无复发生存期,并使用对数秩检验和 Cox 比例风险模型检验组间生存差异。
研究期间共有 103 例阑尾腺癌患者在我院接受治疗。68 例(66%)患者达到完全细胞减灭(细胞减灭评分 0-1)。在这 68 例患者中,有 26 例接受了辅助化疗。最常见的方案是卡培他滨(n=11)、卡培他滨联合奥沙利铂(n=7)和 5-FU 联合奥沙利铂(n=6)。肿瘤组织病理学和分级以及实现完全细胞减灭的能力是总生存的显著预测因素。接受完全细胞减灭后接受辅助化疗的非低级别和高分化肿瘤患者的中位 OS 为 9.03 年,而未接受辅助化疗的患者为 2.88 年(P=.02)。在接受完全细胞减灭的低级别和高分化肿瘤患者中,接受辅助化疗和未接受辅助化疗的患者之间的 OS 无统计学差异。
辅助化疗似乎对非低级别或高分化肿瘤类型的阑尾腺癌患者有益,但对低级别或高分化肿瘤患者则无明显益处。