Crossley Najeeb, Tipton Camrin, Meier Teresa, Sudhoff Mickaela, Kharofa Jordan
Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Cincinnati Medical Center, Cincinnati, United States.
J Contemp Brachytherapy. 2020 Feb;12(1):12-16. doi: 10.5114/jcb.2020.93515. Epub 2020 Feb 28.
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-guided adaptive brachytherapy is the standard of care for cervical cancer. Hybrid intracavitary/interstitial applicators for bulky tumor (high-risk clinical target volume [HR-CTV] > 30 cc) dose escalation is recommended in the EMBRACE II trial. The value of hybrid applicators for smaller HR-CTV (< 30 cc) in organ at risk (OAR) sparing is less certain.
Twenty-seven patients with FIGO stage I-IVA cervical cancer treated with definitive chemoradiation and MRI-based brachytherapy using conventional tandem and ring (TR) applicators were re-planned using virtual needles. They were then summed with the external beam dose to evaluate target coverage and OAR dose using EQD summation. Target and OAR dose with/without hybrid applicator use were compared.
Eighty-one percent had HR-CTV volumes < 30 cc, for which, hybrid TR applicators had significantly lower mean D to all OARs without differences in target coverage. For HR-CTV < 30 cc, the bladder and rectal OAR goals per EMBRACE II were exceeded in significantly fewer patients with the hybrid TR applicators. No significant difference was found in the sigmoid D dose goal.
In small volume tumors (< 30 cc), hybrid applicators may offer improved OAR sparing compared with conventional tandem and ring applicators, and may increase the proportion of patients meeting EMBRACE II OAR goals.
磁共振成像(MRI)引导下的自适应近距离放射治疗是宫颈癌的标准治疗方法。在EMBRACE II试验中,推荐使用混合腔内/组织间施源器对体积较大的肿瘤(高危临床靶区[HR-CTV]>30 cc)进行剂量递增。对于较小的HR-CTV(<30 cc),混合施源器在保护危及器官(OAR)方面的价值尚不确定。
对27例FIGO I-IVA期宫颈癌患者进行了重新计划,这些患者接受了根治性放化疗和基于MRI的近距离放射治疗,使用传统的串联和环形(TR)施源器,并使用虚拟针进行计划。然后将其与外照射剂量相加,使用等效剂量总和来评估靶区覆盖情况和OAR剂量。比较使用和不使用混合施源器时的靶区和OAR剂量。
81%的患者HR-CTV体积<30 cc,对于这些患者,混合TR施源器对所有OAR的平均剂量显著降低,而靶区覆盖无差异。对于HR-CTV<30 cc,使用混合TR施源器的患者中超过EMBRACE II中膀胱和直肠OAR目标的患者明显减少。在乙状结肠D剂量目标方面未发现显著差异。
在小体积肿瘤(<30 cc)中,与传统的串联和环形施源器相比,混合施源器可能在保护OAR方面有更好的效果,并且可能增加达到EMBRACE II OAR目标的患者比例。