• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

亚洲2型糖尿病患者中钠-葡萄糖协同转运蛋白2抑制剂与血脂谱之间的临床相关性:一项随机对照试验的系统评价与荟萃分析

Clinical relevance between sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors and lipid profiles in Asian patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a systematic review with a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

作者信息

Mukai Junichi, Yoshiyama Ayano, Kubota Rie

机构信息

Division of Clinical Pharmacy (Laboratory of Clinical Pharmacy Education) and Research and Education Center for Clinical Pharmacy, School of Pharmacy, Kitasato University, 5-9-1 Shirokane, Minato-ku, Tokyo, 108-8641 Japan.

出版信息

J Pharm Health Care Sci. 2020 Mar 14;6:4. doi: 10.1186/s40780-020-00160-0. eCollection 2020.

DOI:10.1186/s40780-020-00160-0
PMID:32190340
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7071682/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Few systematic reviews have examined the effects of sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2is) on lipid profiles in Asian patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. We conducted a systematic review with a meta-analysis to summarize the available literature and confirm the effects of SGLT2is on lipid profiles in these patients.

METHODS

We searched the electronic databases MEDLINE, CENTRAL, and Ichushi-web for studies from the dates of their earliest publication to July 2018, and there was no language restriction. Trials were included if they were randomized controlled trials (RCTs) (1) comparing the effects of SGLT2is with a placebo in Asian patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (18 years or older), and (2) reporting HbA1c and at least one lipid parameter, such as triglycerides (TG), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), or low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C). The weighted mean difference with a 95% confidence interval (CI) was calculated using a random-effects model.

RESULTS

Among the 630 studies retrieved, 17 RCTs that included 4485 patients were ultimately included in our review. Fourteen RCTs were conducted in Japan. The durations of RCTs ranged between 12 and 24 weeks. SGLT2is significantly improved HbA1c [mean difference - 0.80 (95%CI - 0.96 to - 0.64)%,  < 0.00001], TG [mean difference - 16.42 (95%CI - 22.71 to - 10.12) mg/dL,  < 0.00001], and HDL-C [mean difference 3.36 (95%CI 2.73 to 3.98) mg/dL,  < 0.00001], but significantly deteriorated LDL-C [mean difference 3.00 (95%CI 1.18 to 4.82) mg/dL,  < 0.001]. The LDL-C/HDL-C ratio was not significantly different between SGLT2is and a placebo [mean difference - 0.01 (95%CI - 0.08 to 0.06),  < 0.74].

CONCLUSION

The present results suggest that in Asian patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus, TG and HDL-C values were better, while LDL-C values were worse with SGLT2is than with a placebo. However, the negative impact of SGLT2is on lipid profiles was modest. Further RCTs with a longer duration or conducted in other Asian countries are needed to provide further evidence to support the clinical relevance of changes in lipid profiles. The present results will be informative for SGLT2is users with concerns regarding the effects of SGLT2is on lipid profiles.

摘要

背景

很少有系统评价研究钠-葡萄糖协同转运蛋白2抑制剂(SGLT2i)对亚洲2型糖尿病患者血脂谱的影响。我们进行了一项系统评价和荟萃分析,以总结现有文献并确认SGLT2i对这些患者血脂谱的影响。

方法

我们检索了电子数据库MEDLINE、CENTRAL和Ichushi-web,查找从最早发表日期至2018年7月的研究,且无语言限制。纳入的试验需为随机对照试验(RCT):(1)比较SGLT2i与安慰剂对18岁及以上亚洲2型糖尿病患者的影响;(2)报告糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)和至少一项血脂参数,如甘油三酯(TG)、高密度脂蛋白胆固醇(HDL-C)或低密度脂蛋白胆固醇(LDL-C)。采用随机效应模型计算加权平均差及95%置信区间(CI)。

结果

在检索到的630项研究中,最终有17项RCT纳入我们的评价,共4485例患者。14项RCT在日本进行。RCT的持续时间为12至24周。SGLT2i显著改善了HbA1c[平均差-0.80(95%CI -0.96至-0.64)%,P<0.00001]、TG[平均差-16.42(95%CI -22.71至-10.12)mg/dL,P<0.00001]和HDL-C[平均差3.36(95%CI 2.73至3.98)mg/dL,P<0.00001],但显著恶化了LDL-C[平均差3.00(95%CI 1.18至4.82)mg/dL,P<0.001]。SGLT2i与安慰剂之间的LDL-C/HDL-C比值无显著差异[平均差-0.01(95%CI -0.08至0.06),P<0.74]。

结论

目前的结果表明,在亚洲2型糖尿病患者中,与安慰剂相比,SGLT2i使TG和HDL-C值改善,而LDL-C值恶化。然而,SGLT2i对血脂谱的负面影响较小。需要进行持续时间更长或在其他亚洲国家开展的进一步RCT,以提供更多证据支持血脂谱变化的临床相关性。本研究结果将为关注SGLT2i对血脂谱影响的使用者提供参考。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9063/7071682/c94cd0b2bee9/40780_2020_160_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9063/7071682/ec6bb644e248/40780_2020_160_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9063/7071682/23b29b490bc4/40780_2020_160_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9063/7071682/234db261d8ff/40780_2020_160_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9063/7071682/524b296aa224/40780_2020_160_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9063/7071682/224a6f3e9cc4/40780_2020_160_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9063/7071682/61ee0d8d0164/40780_2020_160_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9063/7071682/c94cd0b2bee9/40780_2020_160_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9063/7071682/ec6bb644e248/40780_2020_160_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9063/7071682/23b29b490bc4/40780_2020_160_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9063/7071682/234db261d8ff/40780_2020_160_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9063/7071682/524b296aa224/40780_2020_160_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9063/7071682/224a6f3e9cc4/40780_2020_160_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9063/7071682/61ee0d8d0164/40780_2020_160_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9063/7071682/c94cd0b2bee9/40780_2020_160_Fig7_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Clinical relevance between sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors and lipid profiles in Asian patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a systematic review with a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.亚洲2型糖尿病患者中钠-葡萄糖协同转运蛋白2抑制剂与血脂谱之间的临床相关性:一项随机对照试验的系统评价与荟萃分析
J Pharm Health Care Sci. 2020 Mar 14;6:4. doi: 10.1186/s40780-020-00160-0. eCollection 2020.
2
The impact of sodium-glucose Cotransporter-2 inhibitors on lipid profile: A meta-analysis of 28 randomized controlled trials.钠-葡萄糖共转运蛋白 2 抑制剂对血脂谱的影响:28 项随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
Eur J Pharmacol. 2023 Nov 15;959:176087. doi: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2023.176087. Epub 2023 Sep 28.
3
A systematic review of sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors and renal profiles among Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.对日本2型糖尿病患者中钠-葡萄糖协同转运蛋白2抑制剂及肾脏情况的系统评价。
J Pharm Health Care Sci. 2023 Sep 15;9(1):36. doi: 10.1186/s40780-023-00305-x.
4
Effect of sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors on continuous glucose monitoring metrics, as adjunctive to insulin in adults with type 1 diabetes mellitus: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.钠-葡萄糖协同转运蛋白2抑制剂对1型糖尿病成人患者持续葡萄糖监测指标的影响:作为胰岛素辅助治疗的随机对照试验的荟萃分析
Metabolism. 2024 Apr;153:155791. doi: 10.1016/j.metabol.2024.155791. Epub 2024 Jan 15.
5
The renoprotective effects of sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors versus placebo in patients with type 2 diabetes with or without prevalent kidney disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis.钠-葡萄糖共转运蛋白 2 抑制剂与安慰剂在伴有或不伴有现有肾脏疾病的 2 型糖尿病患者中的肾脏保护作用:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2019 Apr;21(4):1018-1026. doi: 10.1111/dom.13620. Epub 2019 Jan 16.
6
Comparative Effects of Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter 2 Inhibitors on Serum Electrolyte Levels in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes: A Pairwise and Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.钠-葡萄糖共转运蛋白 2 抑制剂对 2 型糖尿病患者血清电解质水平影响的比较:一项随机对照试验的两两比较和网络荟萃分析。
Kidney360. 2022 Jan 19;3(3):477-487. doi: 10.34067/KID.0006672021. eCollection 2022 Mar 31.
7
8
Longer-term Benefits and Risks of Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter-2 Inhibitors in Type 2 Diabetes: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.钠-葡萄糖共转运蛋白 2 抑制剂在 2 型糖尿病中的长期获益和风险:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Gen Intern Med. 2022 Feb;37(2):439-448. doi: 10.1007/s11606-021-07227-0. Epub 2021 Nov 30.
9
A literature review and meta-analysis of safety profiles of SGLT2 inhibitors in Japanese patients with diabetes mellitus.一项关于 SGLT2 抑制剂在日本糖尿病患者中的安全性特征的文献复习和荟萃分析。
Sci Rep. 2021 Jun 29;11(1):13472. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-92925-2.
10
Effect of sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors on lipid profile: A systematic review and meta-analysis of 48 randomized controlled trials.钠-葡萄糖协同转运蛋白 2 抑制剂对血脂谱的影响:48 项随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Pharmacol Res. 2020 Oct;160:105068. doi: 10.1016/j.phrs.2020.105068. Epub 2020 Jul 8.

引用本文的文献

1
Long-term effects of metformin versus sodium glucose transporter 2 inhibitors on cardiovascular outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes.二甲双胍与钠-葡萄糖协同转运蛋白2抑制剂对2型糖尿病患者心血管结局的长期影响。
Am J Transl Res. 2025 Jun 15;17(6):4267-4277. doi: 10.62347/YNWL3428. eCollection 2025.
2
Empagliflozin-based quadruple oral therapy for type 2 diabetes: a prospective cohort study.基于恩格列净的2型糖尿病四重口服疗法:一项前瞻性队列研究。
Sci Rep. 2025 Jan 9;15(1):1427. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-84993-x.
3
A literature review and meta-analysis of safety profiles of SGLT2 inhibitors in Japanese patients with diabetes mellitus.

本文引用的文献

1
Association Between Triglyceride Lowering and Reduction of Cardiovascular Risk Across Multiple Lipid-Lowering Therapeutic Classes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Regression Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.降脂治疗与多种降脂治疗类别降低心血管风险的关联:一项随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃回归分析。
Circulation. 2019 Oct 15;140(16):1308-1317. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.119.041998. Epub 2019 Sep 18.
2
9. Pharmacologic Approaches to Glycemic Treatment: .9. 血糖治疗的药物学方法: 。
Diabetes Care. 2019 Jan;42(Suppl 1):S90-S102. doi: 10.2337/dc19-S009.
3
Mechanism of Increased LDL (Low-Density Lipoprotein) and Decreased Triglycerides With SGLT2 (Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter 2) Inhibition.
一项关于 SGLT2 抑制剂在日本糖尿病患者中的安全性特征的文献复习和荟萃分析。
Sci Rep. 2021 Jun 29;11(1):13472. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-92925-2.
SGLT2(钠-葡萄糖共转运蛋白 2)抑制增加 LDL(低密度脂蛋白)和降低甘油三酯的机制。
Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2018 Sep;38(9):2207-2216. doi: 10.1161/ATVBAHA.118.311339.
4
No disparity of the efficacy and all-cause mortality between Asian and non-Asian type 2 diabetes patients with sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors treatment: A meta-analysis.亚洲和非亚洲 2 型糖尿病患者使用钠-葡萄糖共转运蛋白 2 抑制剂治疗的疗效和全因死亡率无差异:一项荟萃分析。
J Diabetes Investig. 2018 Jul;9(4):850-861. doi: 10.1111/jdi.12760. Epub 2017 Nov 13.
5
Canagliflozin and Cardiovascular and Renal Events in Type 2 Diabetes.卡格列净与 2 型糖尿病的心血管和肾脏事件。
N Engl J Med. 2017 Aug 17;377(7):644-657. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1611925. Epub 2017 Jun 12.
6
Efficacy, safety, and tolerability of ipragliflozin in Asian patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and inadequate glycemic control with metformin: Results of a phase 3 randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, multicenter trial.吡格列酮在二甲双胍血糖控制不佳的亚洲 2 型糖尿病患者中的疗效、安全性和耐受性:一项 3 期随机、安慰剂对照、双盲、多中心试验的结果。
J Diabetes Investig. 2016 May;7(3):366-73. doi: 10.1111/jdi.12422. Epub 2015 Oct 14.
7
Efficacy and safety of canagliflozin in combination with insulin: a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.卡格列净联合胰岛素治疗的疗效及安全性:一项针对日本2型糖尿病患者的双盲、随机、安慰剂对照研究。
Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2016 Jun 18;15:89. doi: 10.1186/s12933-016-0407-4.
8
Influence of Renal Function on the 52-Week Efficacy and Safety of the Sodium Glucose Cotransporter 2 Inhibitor Luseogliflozin in Japanese Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.肾功能对钠-葡萄糖协同转运蛋白2抑制剂鲁格列净在日本2型糖尿病患者中52周疗效及安全性的影响
Clin Ther. 2016 Jan 1;38(1):66-88.e20. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2015.10.025. Epub 2015 Dec 22.
9
Empagliflozin, Cardiovascular Outcomes, and Mortality in Type 2 Diabetes.恩格列净:在 2 型糖尿病中的心血管结局和死亡率。
N Engl J Med. 2015 Nov 26;373(22):2117-28. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1504720. Epub 2015 Sep 17.
10
Differential response in levels of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol to one-year metformin treatment in prediabetic patients by race/ethnicity.糖尿病前期患者高密度脂蛋白胆固醇水平对为期一年二甲双胍治疗的种族/民族差异反应。
Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2015 Jun 12;14:79. doi: 10.1186/s12933-015-0240-1.