Suppr超能文献

临时和永久起搏器植入延迟:原因及院内结局

Delays in Temporary and Permanent Pacemakers: Causes and In-Hospital Outcomes.

作者信息

Irfan Muhammad, Khan Imran, Ullah Bacha Kaleem

机构信息

Cardiology, Lady Reading Hospital, Peshawar, PAK.

Cardiology/Clinical Cardiac Electrophysiology, Lady Reading Hospital, Peshawar, PAK.

出版信息

Cureus. 2020 Feb 11;12(2):e6953. doi: 10.7759/cureus.6953.

Abstract

Background Temporary pacemakers frequently serve as a bridge to permanent pacemakers, but placement of the latter may be delayed. This study assessed the causes and in-hospital outcomes of patients with delayed placement of permanent pacemakers. Methods This retrospective study included all patients admitted to the Emergency Department who underwent temporary transvenous pacing in the Department of Cardiology, Lady Reading Hospital, Peshawar, Pakistan. The duration of hospitalization and the time from temporary to permanent placement were calculated in days. Asystole, infections, cardiac arrest, and death were recorded during the waiting period. Results Of the 260 patients who underwent temporary transvenous pacing, 136 (52.3%) were males and 124 (47.7%) were females, with an age range of 46-78 years. Coronary artery disease was prevalent in 34% of the patients. Only 5% of the patients were on arteriovenous (AV) nodal blocking agents, 44% had complete AV block, 22% had sinus node disease, and 14% had slow atrial fibrillation. The cause of high-degree AV block could not be determined in most patients. Most patients with ischemia- and hyperkalemia-induced AV block recovered. AV blocks induced by ischemia and with no known cause were not reversible, with most of these patients receiving permanent pacemakers. Of the 260 patients with high-degree AV block, 165 (63.5%) recovered. The mean waiting time for permanent pacemaker implantation was 8.7 ± 5.4 days. The waiting time was associated with increased infections and adverse hospital course. Conclusion A longer waiting period between permanent pacemaker indication and implantation is dangerous, as it is associated with an increased risk of adverse events such as infections, syncope, asystole, malignant arrhythmias, cardiac arrest, and death.

摘要

背景

临时起搏器常作为过渡到永久起搏器的桥梁,但永久起搏器的植入可能会延迟。本研究评估了永久起搏器植入延迟患者的原因及住院期间的结局。

方法

这项回顾性研究纳入了所有在巴基斯坦白沙瓦莱迪夫人医院心脏病科接受临时经静脉起搏的急诊科住院患者。住院时间和从临时起搏到永久植入的时间以天计算。记录等待期间的心脏停搏、感染、心脏骤停和死亡情况。

结果

在260例接受临时经静脉起搏的患者中,男性136例(52.3%),女性124例(47.7%),年龄范围为46 - 78岁。34%的患者患有冠状动脉疾病。仅5%的患者使用房室结阻滞剂,44%有完全性房室传导阻滞,22%有窦房结疾病,14%有缓慢型心房颤动。大多数患者无法确定高度房室传导阻滞的原因。大多数因缺血和高钾血症诱发的房室传导阻滞患者恢复。由缺血诱发且原因不明的房室传导阻滞不可逆性,这些患者大多接受了永久起搏器植入。在260例高度房室传导阻滞患者中,165例(63.5%)恢复。永久起搏器植入的平均等待时间为8.7±5.4天。等待时间与感染增加及不良住院病程相关。

结论

永久起搏器适应证与植入之间的等待时间延长是危险的,因为它与感染、晕厥、心脏停搏、恶性心律失常、心脏骤停和死亡等不良事件的风险增加相关。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7388/7067517/47e653ee8137/cureus-0012-00000006953-i01.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验