Cook Nigel, Geier Andreas, Schmid Andreas, Hirschfield Gideon, Kautz Achim, Schattenberg Jörn M, Balp Maria-Magdalena
Novartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland.
Division of Hepatology, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
JHEP Rep. 2020 Feb 1;2(2):100081. doi: 10.1016/j.jhepr.2020.100081. eCollection 2020 Apr.
BACKGROUND & AIMS: There is currently no data on physician preferences regarding future therapies for non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH); this study explores these preferences and characteristics that are relevant to physician decision-making when choosing a potential therapy for a patient with NASH. The results were compared with those from a similar patient preference survey which was conducted in parallel.
Initial exploratory 30-minute telephone interviews were conducted to inform the design of a 15-minute quantitative online specialist physicians survey, containing direct questions and a preference survey. This was based on a best-worst scaling (BWS) experiment to assess the relative importance of different treatment characteristics (attributes), followed by several paired comparison questions to understand the preference for 5 hypothetical product profiles.
The answers come from 121 physicians from Canada (n = 31), Germany (n = 30), the UK (n = 30) and the USA (n = 30). The primary driving element in NASH treatment decision-making was efficacy (49.23%), defined as "[hypothetical product] impact on liver status" and "[slowing of] progression to cirrhosis". Physicians reported the common use of non-invasive NASH diagnostic tests and 81% reported performing liver biopsy. In 57% of cases, physicians reported that "concerns related to the available diagnostic methods" limit the number of patients with biopsy-confirmed NASH.
This first physician preference study reveals that efficacy will be the main driver for physicians in selecting future NASH drugs. The findings also confirm the widespread use of non-invasive diagnostic tests and the reluctance to perform confirmatory liver biopsy despite guideline recommendations, mainly due to limited therapeutic options and patient refusal.
This study explores physician preferences in relation to future therapies for non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) and characteristics that are relevant to physician decision-making when choosing a potential therapy for a patient with NASH. The results of a short online survey completed by 121 specialist physicians determined that the primary factor that influences treatment decision-making is efficacy, and that a wide range of non-invasive techniques are used to diagnose NASH, while confirmatory liver biopsy is not performed by all physicians despite guideline recommendations.
目前尚无关于医生对非酒精性脂肪性肝炎(NASH)未来治疗方法偏好的数据;本研究探讨了这些偏好以及在为NASH患者选择潜在治疗方法时与医生决策相关的特征。并将结果与同时进行的一项类似的患者偏好调查结果进行了比较。
首先进行了30分钟的探索性电话访谈,以指导设计一项15分钟的定量在线专科医生调查,该调查包含直接问题和偏好调查。这基于最佳-最差尺度(BWS)实验,以评估不同治疗特征(属性)的相对重要性,随后是几个配对比较问题,以了解对5种假设产品概况的偏好。
答案来自加拿大(n = 31)、德国(n = 30)、英国(n = 30)和美国(n = 30)的121名医生。NASH治疗决策的主要驱动因素是疗效(49.23%),定义为“[假设产品]对肝脏状态的影响”和“[延缓]肝硬化进展”。医生报告了非侵入性NASH诊断测试的常用情况,81%的医生报告进行了肝活检。在57%的病例中,医生报告称“对现有诊断方法的担忧”限制了经活检确诊为NASH的患者数量。
这项首次针对医生偏好的研究表明,疗效将是医生选择未来NASH药物的主要驱动因素。研究结果还证实了非侵入性诊断测试的广泛使用,以及尽管有指南建议,但由于治疗选择有限和患者拒绝,医生不愿进行确诊性肝活检。
本研究探讨了医生对非酒精性脂肪性肝炎(NASH)未来治疗方法的偏好,以及在为NASH患者选择潜在治疗方法时与医生决策相关的特征。121名专科医生完成的一项简短在线调查结果确定,影响治疗决策的主要因素是疗效,并且广泛使用了多种非侵入性技术来诊断NASH,而尽管有指南建议,但并非所有医生都进行确诊性肝活检。