• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

儿童对人类特征成因的信念:基因、环境还是选择?

Children's beliefs about causes of human characteristics: Genes, environment, or choice?

机构信息

Department of Psychology.

School of Public Health.

出版信息

J Exp Psychol Gen. 2020 Oct;149(10):1935-1949. doi: 10.1037/xge0000751. Epub 2020 Mar 19.

DOI:10.1037/xge0000751
PMID:32191083
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8691484/
Abstract

To what extent do our genes make us nice, smart, or athletic? The explanatory frameworks we employ have broad consequences for how we evaluate and interact with others. Yet to date, little is known regarding when and how young children appeal to genetic explanations to understand human difference. The current study examined children's (aged 7-13 years) and adults' explanations for a set of human characteristics, contrasting genetic attributions with environmental and choice-based attributions. Whereas most adults and older children offered an unprompted genetic explanation at least once on an open-ended task, such explanations were not seen from younger children. However, even younger children, once trained on the mechanism of genes, endorsed genetic explanations for a range of characteristics-often in combination with environment and choice. Moreover, only adults favored genetic explanations for intelligence and athleticism; children, in contrast, favored environment and choice explanations for these characteristics. These findings suggest that children can employ genetic explanations in principled ways as early as 7 years of age but also that such explanations are used to account for a wider range of features by adults. Our study provides some of the first evidence regarding the ways in which genetic attributions emerge and change starting in early childhood. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).

摘要

我们的基因在多大程度上决定了我们的善良、聪明或运动能力?我们所采用的解释框架对我们如何评价和与他人互动有着广泛的影响。然而,迄今为止,我们对于儿童何时以及如何利用遗传解释来理解人类差异知之甚少。本研究考察了儿童(7-13 岁)和成年人对一系列人类特征的解释,将遗传归因与环境和基于选择的归因进行对比。尽管大多数成年人和年龄较大的儿童在开放式任务中至少一次自发地给出了遗传解释,但年龄较小的儿童没有给出这种解释。然而,即使是年龄较小的儿童,一旦接受了基因机制的训练,也会对一系列特征给出遗传解释——通常与环境和选择相结合。此外,只有成年人支持智力和运动能力的遗传解释;相比之下,儿童则支持环境和选择解释这些特征。这些发现表明,儿童早在 7 岁就可以以原则性的方式使用遗传解释,但这些解释也被成年人用来解释更广泛的特征。我们的研究提供了一些关于遗传归因从儿童早期开始出现和变化的方式的首批证据。(PsycInfo 数据库记录(c)2020 APA,保留所有权利)。

相似文献

1
Children's beliefs about causes of human characteristics: Genes, environment, or choice?儿童对人类特征成因的信念:基因、环境还是选择?
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2020 Oct;149(10):1935-1949. doi: 10.1037/xge0000751. Epub 2020 Mar 19.
2
Neighborhood features moderate genetic and environmental influences on children's social information processing.邻里环境对儿童的社会信息处理具有中等程度的遗传和环境影响。
Dev Psychol. 2024 Apr;60(4):610-623. doi: 10.1037/dev0001690. Epub 2024 Feb 29.
3
Children's and adults' understanding of death: Cognitive, parental, and experiential influences.儿童和成人对死亡的理解:认知、父母及经历的影响。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2018 Feb;166:96-115. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2017.07.014.
4
A developmental intergroup theory of social stereotypes and prejudice.社会刻板印象与偏见的发展性群体间理论。
Adv Child Dev Behav. 2006;34:39-89. doi: 10.1016/s0065-2407(06)80004-2.
5
Mind the gap: How incomplete explanations influence children's interest and learning behaviors.注意差距:不完整的解释如何影响儿童的兴趣和学习行为。
Cogn Psychol. 2021 Nov;130:101421. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2021.101421. Epub 2021 Aug 20.
6
Constrained Choice: Children's and Adults' Attribution of Choice to a Humanoid Robot.约束选择:儿童和成人对人形机器人的选择归因。
Cogn Sci. 2021 Oct;45(10):e13043. doi: 10.1111/cogs.13043.
7
Discovering social groups via latent structure learning.通过潜在结构学习发现社会群体。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2018 Dec;147(12):1881-1891. doi: 10.1037/xge0000470. Epub 2018 Sep 27.
8
Promoting scientific understanding and conceptual change in young children using explanations and guidance.利用讲解和引导促进幼儿对科学的理解和概念转变。
Dev Psychol. 2024 Apr;60(4):729-746. doi: 10.1037/dev0001672. Epub 2024 Feb 15.
9
A longitudinal genetically informed analysis of parental negativity and children's negative emotionality in middle childhood.纵向遗传信息分析父母的消极性和儿童在儿童中期的消极情绪。
Dev Psychol. 2019 Nov;55(11):2403-2416. doi: 10.1037/dev0000799. Epub 2019 Aug 15.
10
Social statistics: Children use statistical reasoning to guide their inferences about the scope of social behavior.社会统计学:儿童使用统计推理来指导他们对社会行为范围的推断。
Dev Psychol. 2019 Jan;55(1):66-79. doi: 10.1037/dev0000618. Epub 2018 Oct 25.

引用本文的文献

1
Do Children Think it is Important to Predict Learning and Behaviour Problems, and Do They Think Genetic Screening Has a Role to Play in This?儿童是否认为预测学习和行为问题很重要,他们是否认为基因筛查在此方面发挥作用?
J Autism Dev Disord. 2024 Jun;54(6):2368-2385. doi: 10.1007/s10803-023-05966-z. Epub 2023 Apr 6.
2
Genetic essentialist beliefs about criminality predict harshness of recommended punishment.遗传本质主义者对犯罪的信念预测了建议惩罚的严厉程度。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2022 Dec;151(12):3230-3248. doi: 10.1037/xge0001240. Epub 2022 Jun 27.
3
Ending genetic essentialism through genetics education.通过遗传学教育终结基因本质主义
HGG Adv. 2021 Sep 21;3(1):100058. doi: 10.1016/j.xhgg.2021.100058. eCollection 2022 Jan 13.
4
Categories convey prescriptive information across domains and development.类别在不同领域和发展阶段传达规范性信息。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2021 Dec;212:105231. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2021.105231. Epub 2021 Aug 3.

本文引用的文献

1
Infants' agent individuation: It's what's on the insides that counts.婴儿的主体个体化:内在的才是重要的。
Cognition. 2018 Jun;175:11-19. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2018.01.016. Epub 2018 Feb 22.
2
Making Boundaries Great Again: Essentialism and Support for Boundary-Enhancing Initiatives.让边界再次伟大:本质主义与对增强边界倡议的支持。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2017 Dec;43(12):1643-1658. doi: 10.1177/0146167217724801. Epub 2017 Aug 14.
3
The development and developmental consequences of social essentialism.社会本质主义的发展及其发展后果。
Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci. 2017 Jul;8(4). doi: 10.1002/wcs.1437. Epub 2017 Mar 8.
4
Young Adults' Belief in Genetic Determinism, and Knowledge and Attitudes towards Modern Genetics and Genomics: The PUGGS Questionnaire.年轻人对基因决定论的信念以及对现代遗传学和基因组学的认知与态度:PUGGS问卷
PLoS One. 2017 Jan 23;12(1):e0169808. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0169808. eCollection 2017.
5
Can White children grow up to be Black? Children's reasoning about the stability of emotion and race.白人儿童能成长为黑人吗?儿童对情绪和种族稳定性的推理。
Dev Psychol. 2016 Jun;52(6):887-93. doi: 10.1037/dev0000132. Epub 2016 May 5.
6
Putting humanity back into the teaching of human biology.将人文精神回归到人类生物学教学中。
Stud Hist Philos Biol Biomed Sci. 2015 Aug;52:65-75. doi: 10.1016/j.shpsc.2015.01.011. Epub 2015 Feb 18.
7
The effects of system-justifying motives on endorsement of essentialist explanations for gender differences.系统合理化动机对性别差异本质主义解释的认可的影响。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2013 Dec;105(6):891-908. doi: 10.1037/a0034701.
8
Biogenetic explanations and stigma: a meta-analytic review of associations among laypeople.生物发生学解释与污名:普通民众相关联的关联的元分析综述。
Soc Sci Med. 2013 Nov;96:95-103. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2013.07.017. Epub 2013 Jul 31.
9
Young infants have biological expectations about animals.幼儿对动物有生物学上的预期。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 Oct 1;110(40):15937-42. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1314075110. Epub 2013 Sep 3.
10
Conceptual influences on category-based induction.基于范畴的推理的概念影响。
Cogn Psychol. 2013 May;66(3):327-53. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2013.02.001. Epub 2013 Mar 18.