TB Centre, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.
Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Health and Allied Sciences, Hohoe, Ghana.
PLoS One. 2020 Mar 19;15(3):e0230604. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0230604. eCollection 2020.
Ghana's national prevalence survey showed higher than expected tuberculosis (TB) prevalence, indicating that many people with TB are not identified and treated. This study aimed to identify gaps in the TB diagnostic cascade prior to starting treatment.
A prospective cohort study was conducted in urban and rural health facilities in south-east Ghana. Consecutive patients routinely identified as needing a TB test were followed up for two months to find out if sputum was submitted and/or treatment started. The causal effect of health facility location on submitting sputum was assessed before risk factors were investigated using logistic regression.
A total of 428 persons (mean age 48 years, 67.3% female) were recruited, 285 (66.6%) from urban and 143 (33.4%) from rural facilities. Of 410 (96%) individuals followed up, 290 (70.7%) submitted sputum, among which 27 (14.1%) had a positive result and started treatment. Among those who visited an urban facility, 245/267(91.8%) submitted sputum, compared to 45/143 (31.5%) who visited a rural facility. Participants recruited at the urban facility were far more likely to submit a sputum sample (odds ratio (OR) 24.24, 95%CI 13.84-42.51). After adjustment for confounding, there was still a strong association between attending the urban facility and submitting sputum (adjusted OR (aOR) 9.52, 95%CI 3.87-23.40). Travel distance of >10 km to the laboratory was the strongest predictor of not submitting sputum (aOR 0.12, 95%CI 0.05-0.33).
The majority of presumptive TB patients attending a rural health facility did not submit sputum for testing, mainly due to the long travel distance to the laboratory. Bridging this gap in the diagnostic cascade may improve case detection.
加纳全国患病率调查显示,结核病(TB)的患病率高于预期,表明许多结核病患者未得到确诊和治疗。本研究旨在确定开始治疗前 TB 诊断环节中的差距。
在加纳东南部的城市和农村卫生机构进行了一项前瞻性队列研究。连续确诊需要进行 TB 检查的患者,进行为期两个月的随访,以确定是否提交了痰液并/或开始治疗。在调查危险因素之前,使用逻辑回归评估卫生机构位置对提交痰液的因果影响。
共招募了 428 人(平均年龄 48 岁,67.3%为女性),其中 285 人(66.6%)来自城市,143 人(33.4%)来自农村。在对 410 名(96%)进行随访的个体中,290 名(70.7%)提交了痰液,其中 27 名(14.1%)的结果呈阳性并开始治疗。在访问城市机构的人群中,267/285(93.5%)人提交了痰液,而在访问农村机构的人群中,只有 143/45(31.8%)人提交了痰液。在城市机构招募的参与者更有可能提交痰液样本(优势比(OR)24.24,95%CI 13.84-42.51)。在调整混杂因素后,参加城市机构与提交痰液之间仍存在很强的关联(调整后的 OR(aOR)9.52,95%CI 3.87-23.40)。到实验室的距离超过 10 公里是未提交痰液的最强预测因素(aOR 0.12,95%CI 0.05-0.33)。
大多数到农村卫生机构就诊的疑似结核病患者未提交痰液进行检测,主要是因为到实验室的距离较远。缩小这一诊断环节差距可能会提高病例检出率。