Lancaster Lisa H, Valenzuela Claudia, Mason Wendi, Neurohr Claus, Ripamonti Elena, Kirchgaessler Klaus-Uwe, Cottin Vincent
Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
Pulmonology Department, Hospital Universitario de la Princesa, Madrid, Spain.
Pulm Ther. 2020 Jun;6(1):93-105. doi: 10.1007/s41030-020-00111-y. Epub 2020 Mar 19.
Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is a progressive, debilitating interstitial lung disease. Two antifibrotics, pirfenidone and nintedanib, are available for IPF treatment. Pirfenidone is available as 267 mg capsules and, more recently, as 267 mg and 801 mg tablets. The aim of this study was to examine the perceived benefits of the 801 mg formulation on patient quality of life (QoL), IPF management and pill burden.
Forty-seven patients with IPF and 170 healthcare professionals (HCPs; 150 physicians in France, Germany, Spain and the USA and 20 nurses in the USA) completed online questionnaires comprising 67 and 61 questions, respectively. Eligible patients had experience switching from the 267 mg pirfenidone tablet or capsule formulations to the 801 mg tablet formulation, and eligible HCPs were experienced in managing this switch. Questions included single and multiple responses and scalar questions with responses on a 7-point Likert scale.
Patients received the 267 mg formulation for a median (range) of 6.0 (2.0-40.0) months prior to switching to the 801 mg formulation. Higher percentages of patients reported satisfaction with the 801 mg versus the 267 mg formulation for its convenience (64 vs. 17%) and number of dosage units (70 vs. 2%). More patients reported good emotional well-being on the 801 mg versus the 267 mg formulation (51 vs. 21%), and fewer patients reported missing a dose of pirfenidone (21 vs. 30%). More HCPs perceived high patient adherence with the 801 mg versus the 267 mg formulation (57 vs. 37%). Overall, 33% of physicians had experienced switching patients back to the 267 mg formulation.
Patients and HCPs consistently favoured the 801 mg formulation across multiple domains, including convenience, patient QoL and adherence. The 801 mg formulation may provide an alternative to the 267 mg formulation in patients established on the recommended daily dose of pirfenidone.
特发性肺纤维化(IPF)是一种进行性、使人衰弱的间质性肺疾病。有两种抗纤维化药物,吡非尼酮和尼达尼布可用于IPF治疗。吡非尼酮有267毫克胶囊剂型,最近又有了267毫克和801毫克片剂剂型。本研究的目的是探讨801毫克剂型对患者生活质量(QoL)、IPF管理及服药负担的预期益处。
47例IPF患者和170名医疗保健专业人员(HCPs;法国、德国、西班牙和美国的150名医生以及美国的20名护士)分别完成了包含67个和61个问题的在线问卷。符合条件的患者有从267毫克吡非尼酮片剂或胶囊剂型转换为801毫克片剂剂型的经历,符合条件的HCPs有处理这种转换的经验。问题包括单项和多项回答以及采用7分李克特量表回答的标度问题。
患者在转换为801毫克剂型之前,接受267毫克剂型的中位时间(范围)为6.0(2.0 - 40.0)个月。更高比例的患者报告对801毫克剂型的满意度高于267毫克剂型,因其便利性(64%对17%)和给药单位数量(70%对2%)。更多患者报告服用801毫克剂型时情绪状态良好,高于267毫克剂型(51%对21%),且报告漏服吡非尼酮的患者更少(21%对30%)。更多HCPs认为患者对801毫克剂型的依从性高于267毫克剂型(57%对37%)。总体而言,33%的医生曾让患者换回267毫克剂型。
患者和HCPs在多个方面一致青睐801毫克剂型,包括便利性、患者生活质量和依从性。对于已确定使用推荐日剂量吡非尼酮的患者,801毫克剂型可能是267毫克剂型的一种替代选择。