Esteban Delgado Pilar, Alberca de Las Parras Fernando, López-Picazo Ferrer Julio J, León Molina Joaquín
Aparato Digestivo, Hospital Genera Universitario Morales Meseguer, ESPAÑA.
Aparato Digestivo, Hospital Clínico Universitario Virgen de la Arrixaca, España.
Rev Esp Enferm Dig. 2020 Apr;112(4):299-308. doi: 10.17235/reed.2020.6946/2020.
Within the project "Quality Indicators in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy," under the leadership of the Sociedad Española de Patología Digestiva (SEPD), our goal is to propose the procedures and the structure, process, and outcome indicators required for the application and assessment of quality in enteroscopy. To this end a search was performed for quality indicators in enteroscopy. Quality of evidence was measured by using the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) system, and classified as high, moderate, low, and very low. A total of 10 process indicators (one preprocedure, eight procedure, one postprocedure) were identified for enteroscopy, with appropriate indication and choice of most efficient route being most significant.
在西班牙消化病学会（SEPD）的领导下，于“胃肠内镜质量指标”项目中，我们的目标是提出小肠镜检查质量应用与评估所需的程序以及结构、过程和结果指标。为此，对小肠镜检查的质量指标进行了检索。采用GRADE（推荐分级的评估、制定与评价）系统衡量证据质量，并将其分为高、中、低和极低四类。共确定了10项小肠镜检查的过程指标（1项检查前、8项检查中、1项检查后），其中适当的适应症和选择最有效的检查途径最为重要。
