Eliason Michael J, Hadford Stephen, Green Lauren, Reeves Travis
Naval Medical Center Portsmouth, Department of Otolaryngology, Portsmouth, VA.
Cleveland Clinic, Head and Neck Institute, Cleveland, OH.
J Craniofac Surg. 2020 Jun;31(4):980-982. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000006307.
The goals of cleft palate repair are well-established; however, there does exist difference in practice patterns regarding the most appropriate patient age for palatoplasty. The optimal timing is debated and influenced by cleft type, surgical technique, and the surgeon's training. The objective of this study was to compare the rates of post-operative fistula formation and velopharyngeal insufficiency (VPI) in "early" versus "standard" cleft palate repair in a cohort of patients treated at a single craniofacial center.A retrospective chart review identified 525 patients treated for cleft palate from 2000 to 2017 with 216 meeting inclusion criteria. "Early repair" is defined as palatoplasty before 6-months of age (108 patients). "Standard repair" is palatoplasty at or beyond 6-months old (108 patients). Rates of fistula formation were found to be significantly higher in early repairs (Chi-square statistic 9.0536, P value = 0.0026). Development of VPI was not significantly different between the 2 groups (Chi-square statistic 1.2068, P value = 0.27196). As expected, the incidence of post-palatoplasty VPI was significantly higher in patients who had a post-operative fistula when compared to those who healed without fistula formation (Chi-square statistic 4.3627, P value = 0.0367).There is significant debate regarding the optimal timing of cleft repair to maximize speech outcomes and minimize risks. The authors' data show that post-operative fistula formation occurs at a higher rate when performed prior to 6 months old. Furthermore, while the rate of VPI was not significantly affected by age at time of surgery, it was significantly higher in those who experienced a post-operative fistula.
腭裂修复的目标已明确确立;然而,在最合适的腭裂修复患者年龄的实践模式方面确实存在差异。最佳时机存在争议,且受腭裂类型、手术技术和外科医生培训的影响。本研究的目的是比较在单一颅面中心接受治疗的一组患者中,“早期”与“标准”腭裂修复术后瘘管形成率和腭咽闭合不全(VPI)的发生率。一项回顾性病历审查确定了2000年至2017年期间接受腭裂治疗的525例患者,其中216例符合纳入标准。“早期修复”定义为在6个月龄之前进行的腭裂修复(108例患者)。“标准修复”是指在6个月龄及以上进行的腭裂修复(108例患者)。结果发现,早期修复的瘘管形成率显著更高(卡方统计量9.0536,P值 = 0.0026)。两组之间VPI的发生率没有显著差异(卡方统计量1.2068,P值 = 0.27196)。正如预期的那样,与未形成瘘管而愈合的患者相比,术后有瘘管的患者腭成形术后VPI的发生率显著更高(卡方统计量4.3627,P值 = 0.0367)。关于腭裂修复的最佳时机以实现最佳语音效果并将风险降至最低存在重大争议。作者的数据表明,在6个月龄之前进行修复时,术后瘘管形成的发生率更高。此外,虽然VPI的发生率在手术时不受年龄的显著影响,但在有术后瘘管的患者中显著更高。