• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

临床路径的应用可以降低肿瘤护理模式中的药物支出。

Utilization of Clinical Pathways Can Reduce Drug Spend Within the Oncology Care Model.

机构信息

New Century Health, Brea, CA.

Cancer Care Specialists of Illinois, Decatur, IL.

出版信息

JCO Oncol Pract. 2020 May;16(5):e456-e463. doi: 10.1200/JOP.19.00753. Epub 2020 Mar 20.

DOI:10.1200/JOP.19.00753
PMID:32196401
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7224689/
Abstract

PURPOSE

Reducing drug spend is one of the greatest challenges for practices participating in the Oncology Care Model (OCM). Evidence-based clinical pathways have the potential to decrease drug spend while maintaining clinical outcomes consistent with published evidence. The goal of this study was to determine whether voluntary use of clinical pathways by a practice can maximize OCM episodic cost savings.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

A community oncology practice used evidence-based clinical pathways for OCM-attributed patients. All treatment plans were submitted to the pathway vendor in real time for clinical pathway adherence measurement. Analysis was conducted before implementation and on an ongoing daily and weekly basis to identify cases in which higher cost drugs or regimens were ordered. A clinical data governance committee met biweekly to review clinical pathway performance metrics and drug utilization.

RESULTS

From quarter 1 of 2017 to quarter 1 of 2019, the median drug spend increased less rapidly for Cancer Care Specialists of Illinois (CCSI; 18.6%) compared with OCM (34.4%). Furthermore, the percent difference in drug spend for CCSI relative to OCM decreased from 13.5% to 0.1% ( < .001). Each quarter, there was approximately a 1.7% decrease (95% CI, 1.0% to 2.4%) in drug spend for CCSI relative to OCM. Additional analyses found that, over a 15-month period (October 2017 through December 2019), CCSI achieved an increase in pathway adherence from 69% to 81%.

CONCLUSION

Reduction in drug spend is possible within a value-based care model, using evidence-based clinical pathways.

摘要

目的

对于参与肿瘤护理模式(Oncology Care Model,OCM)的实践而言,降低药品支出是最大的挑战之一。循证临床路径有可能在保持与已发表证据一致的临床结果的同时降低药品支出。本研究的目的是确定实践中是否可以自愿使用临床路径来最大化 OCM 发作成本节约。

方法和材料

一家社区肿瘤学实践使用了基于证据的临床路径来治疗 OCM 归因于的患者。所有治疗计划都实时提交给路径供应商,以测量临床路径的依从性。在实施之前以及每天和每周进行分析,以确定开出了更高成本的药物或方案的病例。临床数据治理委员会每两周举行一次会议,以审查临床路径绩效指标和药物利用情况。

结果

从 2017 年第一季度到 2019 年第一季度,伊利诺伊州癌症护理专家(Cancer Care Specialists of Illinois,CCSI)的药物支出中位数增长速度比 OCM 慢(18.6%对 34.4%)。此外,CCSI 药物支出相对于 OCM 的差异百分比从 13.5%降至 0.1%(<.001)。与 OCM 相比,CCSI 每季度的药物支出减少了约 1.7%(95%CI,1.0%至 2.4%)。进一步的分析发现,在 15 个月的时间(2017 年 10 月至 2019 年 12 月)内,CCSI 的路径依从性从 69%增加到 81%。

结论

在基于价值的护理模式中,使用基于证据的临床路径可以降低药品支出。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0c16/7224689/4a09244e6624/JOP.19.00753f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0c16/7224689/e4f53f32c7f0/JOP.19.00753f1-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0c16/7224689/08d2a4b4eb9a/JOP.19.00753f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0c16/7224689/4a09244e6624/JOP.19.00753f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0c16/7224689/e4f53f32c7f0/JOP.19.00753f1-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0c16/7224689/08d2a4b4eb9a/JOP.19.00753f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0c16/7224689/4a09244e6624/JOP.19.00753f3.jpg

相似文献

1
Utilization of Clinical Pathways Can Reduce Drug Spend Within the Oncology Care Model.临床路径的应用可以降低肿瘤护理模式中的药物支出。
JCO Oncol Pract. 2020 May;16(5):e456-e463. doi: 10.1200/JOP.19.00753. Epub 2020 Mar 20.
2
Practice patterns among oncologists participating in the oncology care model after three years.参与肿瘤学护理模式三年后的肿瘤学家的实践模式。
J Cancer Policy. 2021 Sep;29:100294. doi: 10.1016/j.jcpo.2021.100294. Epub 2021 Jul 12.
3
Practice Transformation: Early Impact of the Oncology Care Model on Hospital Admissions.实践转型:肿瘤护理模式对住院的早期影响。
J Oncol Pract. 2018 Dec;14(12):e739-e745. doi: 10.1200/JOP.18.00409. Epub 2018 Sep 28.
4
Practice radiation patterns among oncologists in the Oncology Care Model.肿瘤学护理模式中肿瘤学家的实践辐射模式。
Am J Manag Care. 2022 Oct;28(10):515-519. doi: 10.37765/ajmc.2022.89249.
5
Early Findings From the Oncology Care Model Evaluation.肿瘤护理模式评估的早期发现。
J Oncol Pract. 2019 Oct;15(10):e888-e896. doi: 10.1200/JOP.19.00265. Epub 2019 Aug 8.
6
7
Interpreting Oncology Care Model Data to Drive Value-Based Care: A Prostate Cancer Analysis.解读肿瘤学照护模式数据以推动价值为基础的医疗照护:前列腺癌分析。
J Oncol Pract. 2019 Mar;15(3):e238-e246. doi: 10.1200/JOP.18.00336. Epub 2019 Feb 11.
8
Pharmaceutical Cost Savings in the Intensive Care Unit.重症监护病房的药品成本节约
Crit Care Nurs Q. 2017 Oct/Dec;40(4):414-423. doi: 10.1097/CNQ.0000000000000177.
9
Cost variation and savings opportunities in the Oncology Care Model.肿瘤护理模式中的成本变化和节约机会。
Am J Manag Care. 2018 Dec;24(12):618-623.
10
Effects of a Medical Home and Shared Savings Intervention on Quality and Utilization of Care.医疗之家与共享节约干预对医疗质量和利用的影响。
JAMA Intern Med. 2015 Aug;175(8):1362-8. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2015.2047.

引用本文的文献

1
Association of Participation in Medicare's Oncology Care Model With Spending, Utilization, and Quality Outcomes Among Commercially Insured and Medicare Advantage Members.医疗保险肿瘤护理模式参与情况与商业保险和医疗保险优势计划成员的支出、利用情况及质量结果的关联
J Clin Oncol. 2025 Jan 10;43(2):133-142. doi: 10.1200/JCO.24.00502. Epub 2024 Oct 2.
2
Outcomes of Antineoplastic Immunotherapy at a Large Healthcare Organization: Impact of Provider, Race and Socioeconomic Status.大型医疗机构中抗肿瘤免疫疗法的治疗结果:医疗服务提供者、种族和社会经济地位的影响
Cancer Manag Res. 2023 Sep 1;15:913-927. doi: 10.2147/CMAR.S403569. eCollection 2023.
3

本文引用的文献

1
The Oncology Care Model-Why It Works and Why It Could Work Better: Accounting for Novel Therapies in Value-Based Payment.肿瘤护理模式——为何有效以及如何能更有效:基于价值支付中对新型疗法的考量
JAMA Oncol. 2020 Aug 1;6(8):1161-1162. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2019.4385.
2
Pembrolizumab plus Chemotherapy for Squamous Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer.帕博利珠单抗联合化疗用于鳞状非小细胞肺癌。
N Engl J Med. 2018 Nov 22;379(21):2040-2051. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1810865. Epub 2018 Sep 25.
3
Cost and Survival Analysis Before and After Implementation of Dana-Farber Clinical Pathways for Patients With Stage IV Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer.
Rethinking clinical oncology drug research in an era of value-based cancer care: A role for chemotherapy pathways.
重新思考基于价值的癌症护理时代的临床肿瘤药物研究:化疗途径的作用。
Cancer Med. 2020 Aug;9(15):5306-5311. doi: 10.1002/cam4.3193. Epub 2020 Jun 10.
达纳-法伯临床路径应用于IV期非小细胞肺癌患者前后的成本与生存分析
J Oncol Pract. 2017 Apr;13(4):e346-e352. doi: 10.1200/JOP.2017.021741. Epub 2017 Mar 4.
4
New Anticancer Drugs Associated With Large Increases In Costs And Life Expectancy.与成本大幅增加和预期寿命延长相关的新型抗癌药物。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2016 Sep 1;35(9):1581-7. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2016.0286.
5
A Pathway Through the Bundle Jungle.穿越束支迷宫的路径
J Oncol Pract. 2016 Jun;12(6):504-9. doi: 10.1200/JOP.2015.008789. Epub 2016 May 12.
6
Oncology Care Model: Short- and Long-Term Considerations in the Context of Broader Payment Reform.肿瘤护理模式:在更广泛支付改革背景下的短期和长期考量
J Oncol Pract. 2015 Jul;11(4):319-21. doi: 10.1200/JOP.2015.005777. Epub 2015 Jun 9.
7
Medicare innovation center oncology care model: a toe in the water when a plunge is needed.医疗保险创新中心肿瘤护理模式:需要纵身一跃时却只是浅尝辄止。
J Oncol Pract. 2015 Mar;11(2):117-9. doi: 10.1200/JOP.2014.002899. Epub 2015 Feb 17.
8
Pathways, outcomes, and costs in colon cancer: retrospective evaluations in two distinct databases.结直肠癌的途径、结果和成本:两个不同数据库中的回顾性评估。
J Oncol Pract. 2011 May;7(3 Suppl):52s-9s. doi: 10.1200/JOP.2011.000318.
9
Cost effectiveness of evidence-based treatment guidelines for the treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer in the community setting.基于证据的治疗指南在社区环境中非小细胞肺癌治疗的成本效益。
J Oncol Pract. 2010 Jan;6(1):12-8. doi: 10.1200/JOP.091058. Epub 2009 Dec 30.