• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

单切口或单切口加单孔腹腔镜手术治疗结直肠癌

Single-incision or Single-incision Plus One-Port Laparoscopic Surgery for Colorectal Cancer.

作者信息

Hirano Yasumitsu, Hiranuma Chikashi, Hattori Masakazu, Douden Kenji, Yamaguchi Shigeki

机构信息

Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Saitama Medical University, International Medical Center, Saitama, Japan.

Department of Surgery, Fukui Prefectural Hospital, Fukui, Japan.

出版信息

Surg Technol Int. 2020 May 28;36:132-135.

PMID:32196563
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) and single-incision plus one-port laparoscopic surgery (SILS+1) for colorectal cancer are considered to require long operative times, experienced surgeons, and advanced surgical techniques. However, these procedures are advantageous because they require both fewer ports and fewer surgeons.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In the SILS procedure for colon cancer, a Lap Protector™ (LP; Hakkou Shoji, Japan) is inserted through a 2.5 cm transumbilical incision. Next, an EZ-Access (Hakkou Shoji, Japan) is mounted onto the LP, and three ports are made in the EZ-Access. In SILS+1 for rectal cancer, we use an extra incision in the lower quadrant for drainage from the beginning of the operation. Data from 849 patients who underwent elective surgery with SILS or SILS+1 for colorectal cancer were reviewed.

RESULTS

In 808 patients who underwent a reduced-port procedure for colorectal cancer, the mean incision length was 2.91 cm. The average operative time was 198.2 minutes, and average intra-operative blood loss was 25.6 mL. Complications with a Clavien-Dindo classification of II or greater occurred in 63 patients (7.2%). Among 654 stage I-III colorectal cancer patients, 69 (10.6%) experienced postoperative relapse during the follow-up period of 42 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Our cumulative findings support the use of SILS or SILS+1 in patients with colorectal cancer. The long-term oncologic outcomes make them acceptable technical alternatives to conventional multiport laparoscopic colectomy. Further trials are still needed to fully document the non-cosmetic benefits.

摘要

背景

用于结直肠癌的单切口腹腔镜手术(SILS)和单切口加单孔腹腔镜手术(SILS+1)被认为需要较长的手术时间、经验丰富的外科医生以及先进的手术技术。然而,这些手术方式具有优势,因为它们所需的切口和外科医生数量更少。

患者与方法

在结肠癌的SILS手术中,通过一个2.5厘米的脐部切口插入Lap Protector™(LP;日本八光商事)。接下来,将EZ-Access(日本八光商事)安装在LP上,并在EZ-Access上制作三个切口。在直肠癌的SILS+1手术中,我们从手术开始就在下象限额外做一个切口用于引流。回顾了849例行SILS或SILS+1择期结直肠癌手术患者的数据。

结果

在808例行结直肠癌减孔手术的患者中,平均切口长度为2.91厘米。平均手术时间为198.2分钟,平均术中失血量为25.6毫升。Clavien-Dindo分类为II级或更高的并发症发生在63例患者中(7.2%)。在654例I-III期结直肠癌患者中,69例(10.6%)在42个月的随访期内出现术后复发。

结论

我们的累积研究结果支持在结直肠癌患者中使用SILS或SILS+1。长期的肿瘤学结果使它们成为传统多端口腹腔镜结肠切除术可接受的技术替代方案。仍需要进一步的试验来充分记录其非美容方面的益处。

相似文献

1
Single-incision or Single-incision Plus One-Port Laparoscopic Surgery for Colorectal Cancer.单切口或单切口加单孔腹腔镜手术治疗结直肠癌
Surg Technol Int. 2020 May 28;36:132-135.
2
A safety study of transumbilical single incision versus conventional laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.经脐单切口与传统腹腔镜手术治疗结直肠癌的安全性研究:一项随机对照试验的研究方案
Trials. 2015 Nov 30;16:539. doi: 10.1186/s13063-015-1067-5.
3
Single-incision plus one port laparoscopic anterior resection for rectal cancer as a reduced port surgery.单切口加单孔腹腔镜直肠癌前切除术作为一种减少端口手术。
Scand J Surg. 2012;101(4):283-6. doi: 10.1177/145749691210100411.
4
[Short-term outcomes of single incision plus one port laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer].[单切口加单孔腹腔镜手术治疗结直肠癌的短期疗效]
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2021 Jan 25;24(1):48-53. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn.441530-20200409-00193.
5
Single-incision laparoscopic surgery using colon-lifting technique for colorectal cancer: a matched case-control comparison with standard multiport laparoscopic surgery in terms of short-term results and access instrument cost.经结肠提升技术的单孔腹腔镜结直肠手术:与标准多孔腹腔镜手术的短期结果和器械通道费用的匹配病例对照比较。
Surg Endosc. 2012 May;26(5):1403-11. doi: 10.1007/s00464-011-2047-9. Epub 2011 Nov 20.
6
[A retrospective controlled clinical study of single-incision plus one port laparoscopic surgery for sigmoid colon and upper rectal cancer].单切口加单孔腹腔镜手术治疗乙状结肠和上段直肠癌的回顾性对照临床研究
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2017 Jul 1;55(7):515-520. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0529-5815.2017.07.008.
7
Perioperative outcomes for single-port robotic versus single-incision laparoscopic surgery: a comparative analysis in colorectal cancer surgery.单孔机器人与单切口腹腔镜手术的围手术期结果:结直肠癌手术中的对比分析。
Surg Endosc. 2024 Mar;38(3):1568-1575. doi: 10.1007/s00464-023-10629-2. Epub 2024 Jan 4.
8
Assessment of treatment options for rectosigmoid cancer: single-incision plus one port laparoscopic surgery, single-incision laparoscopic surgery, and conventional laparoscopic surgery.直肠乙状结肠癌治疗方案的评估:单切口加单孔腹腔镜手术、单切口腹腔镜手术及传统腹腔镜手术
Surg Endosc. 2017 Jun;31(6):2437-2450. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-5244-8. Epub 2016 Oct 5.
9
Short-Term Clinical and Oncological Outcomes after Single-Incision Plus One Port Laparoscopic Anterior Resection for Rectal Cancer.单孔加单辅助端口腹腔镜直肠癌前切除术的短期临床和肿瘤学结局
Dig Surg. 2018;35(2):111-115. doi: 10.1159/000475872. Epub 2017 May 12.
10
Oncologic long-term outcome of single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) for colorectal cancer.单孔腹腔镜手术(SILS)治疗结直肠癌的肿瘤学长期结果。
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2021 Aug;36(8):1751-1758. doi: 10.1007/s00384-021-03902-0. Epub 2021 Mar 16.

引用本文的文献

1
Influence of reduced-port laparoscopic surgery on perioperative indicators, postoperative recovery, and serum inflammation in patients with colorectal carcinoma.减少切口腹腔镜手术对结直肠癌患者围手术期指标、术后恢复及血清炎症的影响。
World J Gastrointest Surg. 2024 Jun 27;16(6):1734-1741. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v16.i6.1734.
2
Short-term and long-term outcomes of single-incision plus one-port laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer: a propensity-matched cohort study with conventional laparoscopic surgery.单切口加单孔腹腔镜手术与传统腹腔镜手术治疗结直肠癌的短期和长期疗效:倾向评分匹配队列研究。
BMC Gastroenterol. 2023 Nov 29;23(1):420. doi: 10.1186/s12876-023-03058-x.
3
Our initial single port robotic cholecystectomy experience: A feasible and safe option for benign gallbladder diseases.
我们最初的单孔机器人胆囊切除术经验:一种治疗良性胆囊疾病可行且安全的选择。
World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2022 Dec 16;14(12):769-776. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v14.i12.769.
4
Comparison of clinical safety and feasibility between reduced-port laparoscopic radical gastrectomy and conventional laparoscopic radical gastrectomy: A retrospective study.减孔腹腔镜根治性胃切除术与传统腹腔镜根治性胃切除术临床安全性及可行性的比较:一项回顾性研究
Front Surg. 2022 Sep 28;9:995194. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.995194. eCollection 2022.
5
Single-incision laparoscopic ileocolectomy for solitary cecal colon diverticulitis with calcified fecalith: a case report.单孔腹腔镜下治疗伴有钙化粪石的孤立性盲肠结肠憩室炎:1例病例报告
J Surg Case Rep. 2022 Aug 31;2022(8):rjac323. doi: 10.1093/jscr/rjac323. eCollection 2022 Aug.
6
Comparison of clinical efficacy and postoperative inflammatory response between laparoscopic and open radical resection of colorectal cancer.腹腔镜与开腹直肠癌根治术临床疗效及术后炎症反应的比较
World J Clin Cases. 2022 May 6;10(13):4042-4049. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i13.4042.
7
Comparative study on short-term efficacy of single incision plus one (SI+1) port and multiportal 3D laparoscopic minimally invasive esophagectomy.单孔加单辅助端口(SI+1)与多孔三维腹腔镜微创食管切除术短期疗效的比较研究
J Gastrointest Oncol. 2021 Aug;12(4):1277-1284. doi: 10.21037/jgo-21-441.
8
Comparison of outcomes of single incision robotic cholecystectomy and single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy.单孔机器人胆囊切除术与单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术的疗效比较。
Ann Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2021 Feb 28;25(1):78-83. doi: 10.14701/ahbps.2021.25.1.78.
9
Peroral traction-assisted natural orifice trans-anal flexible endoscopic rectosigmoidectomy followed by intracorporeal colorectal anastomosis in a live porcine model.在活猪模型中经口牵引辅助经自然腔道经肛门柔性内镜直肠乙状结肠切除术并随后进行体内结直肠吻合术。
World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2020 Nov 16;12(11):451-458. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v12.i11.451.